Search
Close this search box.

Three key 2021 workers’ comp trends to watch

pexels-igor-starkov-1117452

Three key 2021 workers’ comp trends to watch

Learn more about the ways telemedicine, the pandemic and mega claims are expected to shape workers’ compensation in 2021.

COVID-19-related concerns for 2021 include whether pandemic compensability measures that have been enacted in multiple states will become permanent or evolve to include other diseases and how to best evaluate risks in the current environment.

This past year brought a number of new challenges for the insurance industry. As we look ahead to a new year, here are the top three workers’ compensation trends from leading industry sources. Your employer clients should be aware of these in 2021, as they could impact a range of business operations.

1. Telemedicine services

Since the start of COVID-19, there has been a significant increase in telemedicine services listed on insurance claims. In fact, according to FAIR Health’s Monthly Telehealth Regional Tracker, telehealth claim lines increased 4,347% nationally in 2020 — a substantial jump from 0.17% in March 2019. It is predicted that this advanced technology will continue to be front and center, with 5% of all doctor visits in 2021 being virtual — five times what they were in 2019.

For injured workers, telemedicine has been instrumental in allowing employees to get the treatment they need while avoiding the risks associated with in-person visits or having to wait to speak with a doctor and delaying their treatment. However, statutory and regulatory requirements governing the use of telemedicine vary widely by state and can even differ for injured workers receiving medical care under workers’ comp. According to the National Council on Compensation Insurance (NCCI), there will continue to be questions in 2021 as to how COVID-19 will impact the utilization and accessibility of telemedicine services for workers’ comp, including whether certain states will elect to adopt/implement permanent telemedicine regulations and provisions, how certain provider requirements may change, and how carriers will be reimbursed for services — to name just a few.

2. Mega claims

Extremely large, or “mega,” workers’ comp claims involve very serious on-the-job injuries or illnesses and typically total $3 million or more in incurred losses. In addition to these claims having a lasting impact on employees, businesses can incur steep court costs, lost time, and the potential for reputational damage.

According to a 2020 countrywide workers’ comp report, sectors hit the hardest during the past few years by these types of mega claims were construction ($10 million and higher), office and clerical ($5 million to $10 million), and manufacturing, stores and dealers, transportation, and all other industries ($3 million to $5 million). The most common mega claims involved head/brain and neck/spine injuries and injuries involving multiple parts of the body.

In 2021, workers’ comp losses are likely to increase in both frequency and severity. According to the Insurance Research Council (IRC), key drivers of mega claims can be largely attributed to social inflation — a growth in liability risks and costs related to litigation trends — leading to a rise in claims and losses that ultimately result in more expensive insurance for businesses and consumers. Given this upward trajectory, it will be critical to proactively identify potential areas of risk with your business clients and to adjust risk mitigation strategies.

 3. The impact of COVID-19

According to NCCI, pandemic-related issues will continue to be a top trend and concern of insurance leaders going into 2021. Concerns include whether COVID-19 compensability measures that have been enacted in multiple states will become permanent or evolve to include other diseases, how to best evaluate risks in the current environment, and the impact of compensable injuries and worker safety with more employees working from home.

There are also compliance issues to consider. According to the Workers Compensation Research Institute (WCRI), the number of employees who may be covered by various state laws and executive orders providing some level of compensability for workers who acquire COVID-19 on the job will differ vastly.

Data by the WCRI and the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics predict that the number of workers who may be covered by the various laws and orders will help specific classes of workers have easier access to workers’ comp if they become infected by COVID-19. Recent examples are Alaska, Arkansas, Indiana, Kentucky and Missouri, where it is predicted that employees soon will be covered by a COVID-19 law or order and assigned an exposure risk factor for each individual industry or occupation. The WCRI reported that it will continue to offer predictions of workers covered by these executive orders and laws so businesses can stay informed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts

Insurance-technology

Specific Technologies Driving Insurtech Investment in 2024

Understanding the Funding Decline The decrease in funding does not necessarily spell trouble for the insurance sector but instead highlights a strategic shift, the report suggests. “The insurance industry, like many sectors, is focusing on the most promising ventures with substantial insurance potential,” the report explains. “Insurers are directing their investments toward key areas and current trends such as embedded insurance, employee benefits, and cyber risk management. This strategic investment approach signals a forward-looking mindset within the industry.” Three Key Insurtech Trends for 2024 The report identifies three major trends shaping insurtech investments in 2024: Public Insurtech Companies: Financial and Growth Strategies The report also notes that public insurtech companies are prioritizing revenue growth as their main goal. These firms are restructuring their financial strategies to boost cash flow and capitalize on rising revenue streams. Their growth prospects are supported by expanding asset portfolios and strong market demand. “Public insurtech companies are focusing on revenue growth and optimizing their financial frameworks to increase cash flow,” the report states. “The growth potential for these companies is driven by increasing revenue opportunities, broadening asset bases, and a robust market for their services.” In summary, while global insurtech funding saw a decline in 2023, the industry’s focus on GenAI, digital process management, and connected insurance technologies is setting the stage for a dynamic and forward-looking 2024.

Read More
Business

Insurer Secures Unanimous Supreme Court Victory in New York Choice of Law Dispute

In the world of sports, a clean sweep, a shutout, or a perfect game is the ultimate achievement. In the legal arena, a unanimous decision from the U.S. Supreme Court is equally rare and significant. In a notable legal triumph, Great Lakes Insurance SE achieved a unanimous 9-0 victory in the Supreme Court on February 21, 2024. This victory follows a protracted legal battle that began in the District Court of Pennsylvania, advanced to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and culminated in the Supreme Court’s decisive ruling. Background of the Case: Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Company The heart of the dispute was the insurance contract’s clause selecting New York law to govern any future legal conflicts. Although the financial implications of this case were relatively minor compared to the broader marine insurance industry, the insurer’s determination to uphold a crucial maritime legal principle has significant long-term implications for marine insurance. Faced with the insured’s counterclaims—including allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, insurance bad faith, and violations of Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices Law—the insurer was confronted with serious risks. Such claims could lead to the shifting of attorney’s fees, treble damages, and more, which might normally encourage insurers to settle rather than risk pursuing justice. However, Great Lakes Insurance, supported by The Goldman Maritime Law Group, opted to challenge the Third Circuit’s decision and seek clarity from the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Ruling: A Landmark Decision In a landmark ruling, Justice Brett Kavanaugh affirmed that choice of law provisions in maritime contracts should be upheld by default. This ruling is a major victory for establishing a consistent federal standard in maritime law and avoiding a patchwork of state laws that could complicate marine insurance disputes. The Supreme Court’s decision overturned the Third Circuit’s earlier judgment, which had questioned whether Pennsylvania’s public policy concerns might override the insurance contract’s choice of New York law. By upholding the New York choice of law clause, the Supreme Court eliminated the extra-contractual bad faith claims under Pennsylvania law, thereby ensuring that the dispute could be resolved based on the merits of the insurance claim itself. Significance of the Supreme Court’s Decision This ruling represents a significant advancement in maritime law, affirming that choice of law clauses in maritime contracts are generally enforceable. The decision establishes a clear, uniform legal framework for resolving maritime contract disputes, which will streamline the process and ensure fair adjudication of future insurance claims. Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion was particularly notable for its criticism of the 1955 Wilburn Boat v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance decision, which had previously influenced maritime insurance law. Thomas argued that Wilburn Boat was incorrectly decided and stressed that a uniform and enforceable set of rules is essential for the development of maritime law. Impact on the Marine Insurance Industry The Supreme Court’s decision sets a “bright-line” rule affirming that choice of law clauses are valid unless there is a strong argument against the selected jurisdiction. By endorsing New York’s insurance laws as a reasonable choice, the ruling supports a more consistent and predictable legal environment for marine insurers. This decision represents a major step forward in maritime law, helping insurers better assess risks, determine premiums, and ensure fair and efficient resolution of maritime insurance disputes.

Read More
Try your instant quote