Close this search box.

The future of space risks


The future of space risks

Recent SpaceX launches have reignited interest in space flight — will insurance be able to keep pace with the innovation?

Space: the final frontier…of insurance? As companies revolutionize space flight, outer space is shaping up to become a major market for the insurance industry.

Just turn to SpaceX’s recent historic launch to see the opportunity and possibility that lies ahead for the industry.

On May 29, the company that’s helmed by billionaire Elon Musk became the first-ever to send humans to space aboard a privately-owned spacecraft, moving one step closer to possibly taking tourists and non-astronauts beyond Earth’s atmosphere.

In short, the significance of SpaceX’s launch can be summarized in one word: incredible, says Patrick Slomski, partner at Clyde & Co. As commercialism forces innovation, such as reusable launch vehicles, insurers will have to be nimble to adapt to the enormous complexity and uncertainty of risks, Slomski says.

Ready, set, launch

The aerospace and insurance industries have long had an “intimate” relationship, as Slomski describes it, due to the high degree of expertise needed to operate in the market. As a result, few insurers have ventured into the sector.

According to a Willis Towers Watson report, the space insurance sector has seen significant hardening within the past year as a result of substantial losses. Insurers are withdrawing, capacity is declining, and rate increases are likely on both new and renewal business.

Insurance policies exist to cover satellites and spacecraft during development, pre-launch, launch, and in-orbit, including liability coverage; however, insurance products will need to evolve to address the changing landscape of space flight.

One example would be third party liability. As it stands today, third party liability in space insurance is typically associated with launch activities, says Slomski, but as commercial operations expand, there will be a need to broaden the coverage.

“There will be an increasing need for third party liability coverage, simply because when you have a proliferation of commercial non-state interests and commercial activities in order, it is just pure statistics that you’re more likely to see either physical or electromagnetic interference between different operators in orbit and also from orbit with the ground,” he explains. ”As a commercial operation in space expands, then you will have an expansion of risk; therefore, I suspect there’s an increasing need for third party liability. There will be some novel elements to that. Physical damage caused by something falling out of the sky, it’s been contemplated in lots of areas including aviation liability, of course, but aviation has the benefit of legal regimes that give insurers a degree of certainty. You don’t have quite the same thing for space risks.”

Within the next decade, Slomski also predicts that there will be a greater need for a more comprehensive international liability regime. “It’s a great area for lawyers to think hard about — you want certainty and uniformity of legal rules, and I don’t think we have that right now,” he adds.

Barriers to expansion

Although commercial space flights seem closer than ever to becoming a fully operational sector, there are several hurdles that stand in the way of expansion. Chief among them are regulations.

“The leading space-faring nations do not presently have developed standards and certification legal regimes that you get in civil aviation. That will one day need to be developed to allow the industry to expand properly,” Slomski says.

As part of that process, commercial space operators will need to convince national authorities, such as the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration, that they’ve mitigated risks.

Then there are the issues you face when you get to space that need to be addressed.

“Practical things like space traffic management — knowing which way to turn your vehicle to get out of the way —  that’s now becoming more important,” he says. “But it takes a little while to get those things into place in international law.” In fact, it could take years, if not decades, to get an international set of binding regulations agreed upon but all countries, Slomski adds. “From a lawyer’s perspective, this is something that should be started sooner rather than later.”

Nevertheless, commercial space flight is on pace to become a burgeoning industry if all pieces fall into place. An estimate from UBS projects the broader space industry will double from about $400 billion in 2019 to $805 billion in 2030 — $3 billion coming from the space tourism sub-sector alone.

“Although you might not see an explosion in manned spaceflights as a result of these developments, I think the capabilities are being demonstrated, so there’s an enormous opportunity in the decades to come,” Slomski says. “On the non-human commercial spaceflight side, I think there’s an enormous market that will develop over time.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts


Specific Technologies Driving Insurtech Investment in 2024

Understanding the Funding Decline The decrease in funding does not necessarily spell trouble for the insurance sector but instead highlights a strategic shift, the report suggests. “The insurance industry, like many sectors, is focusing on the most promising ventures with substantial insurance potential,” the report explains. “Insurers are directing their investments toward key areas and current trends such as embedded insurance, employee benefits, and cyber risk management. This strategic investment approach signals a forward-looking mindset within the industry.” Three Key Insurtech Trends for 2024 The report identifies three major trends shaping insurtech investments in 2024: Public Insurtech Companies: Financial and Growth Strategies The report also notes that public insurtech companies are prioritizing revenue growth as their main goal. These firms are restructuring their financial strategies to boost cash flow and capitalize on rising revenue streams. Their growth prospects are supported by expanding asset portfolios and strong market demand. “Public insurtech companies are focusing on revenue growth and optimizing their financial frameworks to increase cash flow,” the report states. “The growth potential for these companies is driven by increasing revenue opportunities, broadening asset bases, and a robust market for their services.” In summary, while global insurtech funding saw a decline in 2023, the industry’s focus on GenAI, digital process management, and connected insurance technologies is setting the stage for a dynamic and forward-looking 2024.

Read More

Insurer Secures Unanimous Supreme Court Victory in New York Choice of Law Dispute

In the world of sports, a clean sweep, a shutout, or a perfect game is the ultimate achievement. In the legal arena, a unanimous decision from the U.S. Supreme Court is equally rare and significant. In a notable legal triumph, Great Lakes Insurance SE achieved a unanimous 9-0 victory in the Supreme Court on February 21, 2024. This victory follows a protracted legal battle that began in the District Court of Pennsylvania, advanced to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and culminated in the Supreme Court’s decisive ruling. Background of the Case: Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Company The heart of the dispute was the insurance contract’s clause selecting New York law to govern any future legal conflicts. Although the financial implications of this case were relatively minor compared to the broader marine insurance industry, the insurer’s determination to uphold a crucial maritime legal principle has significant long-term implications for marine insurance. Faced with the insured’s counterclaims—including allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, insurance bad faith, and violations of Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices Law—the insurer was confronted with serious risks. Such claims could lead to the shifting of attorney’s fees, treble damages, and more, which might normally encourage insurers to settle rather than risk pursuing justice. However, Great Lakes Insurance, supported by The Goldman Maritime Law Group, opted to challenge the Third Circuit’s decision and seek clarity from the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Ruling: A Landmark Decision In a landmark ruling, Justice Brett Kavanaugh affirmed that choice of law provisions in maritime contracts should be upheld by default. This ruling is a major victory for establishing a consistent federal standard in maritime law and avoiding a patchwork of state laws that could complicate marine insurance disputes. The Supreme Court’s decision overturned the Third Circuit’s earlier judgment, which had questioned whether Pennsylvania’s public policy concerns might override the insurance contract’s choice of New York law. By upholding the New York choice of law clause, the Supreme Court eliminated the extra-contractual bad faith claims under Pennsylvania law, thereby ensuring that the dispute could be resolved based on the merits of the insurance claim itself. Significance of the Supreme Court’s Decision This ruling represents a significant advancement in maritime law, affirming that choice of law clauses in maritime contracts are generally enforceable. The decision establishes a clear, uniform legal framework for resolving maritime contract disputes, which will streamline the process and ensure fair adjudication of future insurance claims. Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion was particularly notable for its criticism of the 1955 Wilburn Boat v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance decision, which had previously influenced maritime insurance law. Thomas argued that Wilburn Boat was incorrectly decided and stressed that a uniform and enforceable set of rules is essential for the development of maritime law. Impact on the Marine Insurance Industry The Supreme Court’s decision sets a “bright-line” rule affirming that choice of law clauses are valid unless there is a strong argument against the selected jurisdiction. By endorsing New York’s insurance laws as a reasonable choice, the ruling supports a more consistent and predictable legal environment for marine insurers. This decision represents a major step forward in maritime law, helping insurers better assess risks, determine premiums, and ensure fair and efficient resolution of maritime insurance disputes.

Read More
Try your instant quote