Search
Close this search box.

Riots, civil commotion, and vandalism generally covered by insurance

group-of-policemen-on-horse-2834173

Riots, civil commotion, and vandalism generally covered by insurance

On top of business interruption claims due to COVID-19, claims for damages or closures due to the actions of civil authorities are now likely to increase.

 June 01, 2020

As much of the United States convulses in response to the death of George Floyd, an unarmed black man in the custody of Minneapolis police officers, it’s some comfort to know that property damage caused by rioting, civil commotion and vandalism are covered under standard insurance policies, says Loretta Worters, vice president, media relations for the Insurance Information Institute (I.I.I.).

Here is an overview of the different kinds of policies and coverage that may be involved in any claims. Insured that don’t have the right kind of coverage now can use this information to discuss options with an insurance agent or broker.

Related: How insurers are responding to rising political risks

Damage to vehicles

Automobiles are covered under the optional comprehensive portion of an auto policy, Worters explains. This provides reimbursement for damage to the vehicle and its contents caused by fire, falling objects, vandalism or rioting.

“Comprehensive coverage will also reimburse you if your windshield is cracked or shattered,” she adds. Some companies offer glass coverage without a deductible. Approximately three-quarters of U.S. drivers chose to buy this optional coverage as part of their auto insurance policy.

Damaged buildings and personal property

Standard homeowners policies will cover damage to the property caused by fire, an explosion, a riot or civil commotion, vandalism or malicious mischief. This would include coverage to the structure of the home, as well as any personal possessions.

“If you can’t live at your home because it was damaged by an insured disaster,” Worters says, “standard home (and renters insurance policies) provide coverage for additional living expenses (ALE), which pays the costs of living away from home. ALE covers hotel bills, restaurant meals, and other expenses incurred while your home is being rebuilt.”

Rioting, civil commotion, and vandalism are also covered perils under virtually all business owners and commercial insurance property policies ― both named perils and “all risk” policies. Damage to windows, doors, light fixtures and other items that are part of a building should be covered under the building property coverage included in the policy. “Glass is usually part of covered property and built into base rates as long as it’s part of a building or structure (i.e., store windows and plate glass on office fronts),” Worters notes. “However, there could be some policies that need special glass endorsements.”

Business owners should check with their insurer. Furniture, liquor, glassware office supplies, computers, machinery ― basically everything except for the building itself that was damaged or stolen should qualify for coverage under the business owner’s personal property coverage.

Business income coverage

Business income insurance typically includes civil authority coverage, which provides loss of income that occurs because access to your premises has been prohibited by civil authority, such as a government entity.

“Access must be prohibited due to damage by a covered peril to property,” Worters says, “not located at your premises.” Civil authority insurance covers income lost during a limited period of time, typically four weeks. You can extend this time period by paying an additional premium.

Companies that incur extra expenses to continue operations while the insured premises is being repaired or replaced may be insured under the extra expense coverage provided in most property policies. Typically, this coverage is afforded for costs incurred to reduce a covered loss of business income.

Businesses that are forced to suspend operations or limit hours due to rioting, vandalism or civil commotion and have coverage for the loss of income under business income insurance (also known as business interruption) will be covered.

“Coverage is typically triggered if there is direct physical damage to the premises,” Worters explains. But, business income coverage is often subject to a waiting period (a type of deductible). The waiting period applies to income losses, including those insured under civil authority coverage. It does not apply to extra expense losses. A typical waiting period is 72 hours.

Know your BOP policies

A business owner’s policy (BOP) often combines property, liability and business interruption coverages for small to midsize businesses, Worters says. Coverage purchased as a package is generally less expensive than if purchased through separate insurance policies and can help ensure proper underlying limits are in place. “Normally, companies with 100 employees or fewer and revenues of up to about $5 million or less are candidates for a BOP,” she adds.

Some types of businesses, such as restaurants, may not be eligible for a BOP because of the specific risks inherent in the business, and they may need to consider buying the individual coverages separately. An endorsement or rider can be added to a commercial property insurance policy that will extend coverage to business interruption losses. Only 40% of businesses have business interruption coverage through a standalone policy or BOP, and 44% of small businesses have never had insurance, according to a recent survey by Next Insurance.

How much a BOP costs depends on a number of factors, including your:

  • Industry,
  • Number of employees,
  • Amount of coverage, and
  • Prior claims experience.

The price of the policy can also vary depending on your location. For example, if the business is in an area with a higher risk of hurricanes, the cost may increase. A restaurant might have higher premiums than a real estate agency, for example, because of the greater risk of fire.

Civil authority actions

Remember that civil authorities can bar you from entering your business in situations that are not related to protests, riots or civil unrest. After a heavy rain with widespread flooding, local municipal authorities may not allow you to return to your business or home until the floodwaters recede. If there is a fire, the fire inspector may require you to stay out of the building until it has been deemed safe, which could take days or weeks.

On top of the business interruption claims for shutdowns due to the coronavirus, claims for damages or closures due to the actions of civil authorities are likely to increase. According to one report from a business owner on social media, his carrier has pre-emptively said there is no coverage for damages from violence after a protest in his area. These claims, like the business interruption claims, are sure to be complicated and lead to litigation.

Chaim Berkovic president from Skyscraper Insurance stands up against police brutality and calls out for justice for George Floyd.

Very poor job done by Minneapolis district attorney if you would’ve done something right away & showing that you’re taking this matter seriously we could have avoided all these riots across the country!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts

Insurance-technology

Specific Technologies Driving Insurtech Investment in 2024

Understanding the Funding Decline The decrease in funding does not necessarily spell trouble for the insurance sector but instead highlights a strategic shift, the report suggests. “The insurance industry, like many sectors, is focusing on the most promising ventures with substantial insurance potential,” the report explains. “Insurers are directing their investments toward key areas and current trends such as embedded insurance, employee benefits, and cyber risk management. This strategic investment approach signals a forward-looking mindset within the industry.” Three Key Insurtech Trends for 2024 The report identifies three major trends shaping insurtech investments in 2024: Public Insurtech Companies: Financial and Growth Strategies The report also notes that public insurtech companies are prioritizing revenue growth as their main goal. These firms are restructuring their financial strategies to boost cash flow and capitalize on rising revenue streams. Their growth prospects are supported by expanding asset portfolios and strong market demand. “Public insurtech companies are focusing on revenue growth and optimizing their financial frameworks to increase cash flow,” the report states. “The growth potential for these companies is driven by increasing revenue opportunities, broadening asset bases, and a robust market for their services.” In summary, while global insurtech funding saw a decline in 2023, the industry’s focus on GenAI, digital process management, and connected insurance technologies is setting the stage for a dynamic and forward-looking 2024.

Read More
Business

Insurer Secures Unanimous Supreme Court Victory in New York Choice of Law Dispute

In the world of sports, a clean sweep, a shutout, or a perfect game is the ultimate achievement. In the legal arena, a unanimous decision from the U.S. Supreme Court is equally rare and significant. In a notable legal triumph, Great Lakes Insurance SE achieved a unanimous 9-0 victory in the Supreme Court on February 21, 2024. This victory follows a protracted legal battle that began in the District Court of Pennsylvania, advanced to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and culminated in the Supreme Court’s decisive ruling. Background of the Case: Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Company The heart of the dispute was the insurance contract’s clause selecting New York law to govern any future legal conflicts. Although the financial implications of this case were relatively minor compared to the broader marine insurance industry, the insurer’s determination to uphold a crucial maritime legal principle has significant long-term implications for marine insurance. Faced with the insured’s counterclaims—including allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, insurance bad faith, and violations of Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices Law—the insurer was confronted with serious risks. Such claims could lead to the shifting of attorney’s fees, treble damages, and more, which might normally encourage insurers to settle rather than risk pursuing justice. However, Great Lakes Insurance, supported by The Goldman Maritime Law Group, opted to challenge the Third Circuit’s decision and seek clarity from the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Ruling: A Landmark Decision In a landmark ruling, Justice Brett Kavanaugh affirmed that choice of law provisions in maritime contracts should be upheld by default. This ruling is a major victory for establishing a consistent federal standard in maritime law and avoiding a patchwork of state laws that could complicate marine insurance disputes. The Supreme Court’s decision overturned the Third Circuit’s earlier judgment, which had questioned whether Pennsylvania’s public policy concerns might override the insurance contract’s choice of New York law. By upholding the New York choice of law clause, the Supreme Court eliminated the extra-contractual bad faith claims under Pennsylvania law, thereby ensuring that the dispute could be resolved based on the merits of the insurance claim itself. Significance of the Supreme Court’s Decision This ruling represents a significant advancement in maritime law, affirming that choice of law clauses in maritime contracts are generally enforceable. The decision establishes a clear, uniform legal framework for resolving maritime contract disputes, which will streamline the process and ensure fair adjudication of future insurance claims. Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion was particularly notable for its criticism of the 1955 Wilburn Boat v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance decision, which had previously influenced maritime insurance law. Thomas argued that Wilburn Boat was incorrectly decided and stressed that a uniform and enforceable set of rules is essential for the development of maritime law. Impact on the Marine Insurance Industry The Supreme Court’s decision sets a “bright-line” rule affirming that choice of law clauses are valid unless there is a strong argument against the selected jurisdiction. By endorsing New York’s insurance laws as a reasonable choice, the ruling supports a more consistent and predictable legal environment for marine insurers. This decision represents a major step forward in maritime law, helping insurers better assess risks, determine premiums, and ensure fair and efficient resolution of maritime insurance disputes.

Read More
Try your instant quote