Search
Close this search box.

Metaverse technologies bring opportunities & risks

ruck (7)

Metaverse technologies bring opportunities & risks

With so much that is still unfamiliar, companies have a lot to explore with the metaverse.

In 2023, the metaverse is so much more than digital meeting spaces and games. It provides the potential for businesses to transform the experience of employees and customers, improve processes, and market new products and services. According to a Protiviti-Oxford survey, “Executive Outlook on the Metaverse, 2033 and Beyond,” more than 85% of North American business executives say the metaverse will be “somewhat” or “extremely important” to their business’ future success. However, as the metaverse unlocks future business potential, it also carries some emerging risks for consumers and businesses, creating a growing need for insurance coverage.

While the transition to the metaverse – which is still in its infancy – will be gradual, some businesses have already begun assessing the application of technologies like augmented reality (AR) and extended reality (XR). One example is what’s known as digital twins, which is a virtual model of a process, product, or service. These are virtual representations of physical objects, systems or processes that can be effective for insurers to use in order to run cost-effective simulations, collect data to drive automation and increase efficiency with decision-making. This is significant because it is important for companies to begin to experiment with these technologies in small, incremental steps over time. Companies do not want to fall behind their competitors in the digital space as technology evolves. With AR, XR or digital twins, companies can experiment with what works best for them since not all technologies will be necessary for their business.

One area that businesses may be interested in testing virtual technology is employee training. For example, augmented reality glasses – which provide a virtual overlay on top of a physical device with step-by-step instructions – can reduce training time, costs, and risks, while increasing employee engagement and safety awareness.

Emerging metaverse risks

As virtual real estate, digital assets and personal avatars (a graphical representation of a user or the user’s character or persona) expand, new risks are emerging for businesses, technology developers and insurers. Risks to consider include liability, data security and privacy issues. In the Protiviti survey, 42% of business executives polled said privacy and security risks were the primary roadblocks to implementing their metaverse strategy. This makes it critical for business to not only think through the return on investment from the new technology, but also understand the risks. Some top risks to consider include:

Phishing and scams

As consumers and businesses navigate the growing world of virtual avatars, new types of scams – including 3D social engineering and phishing – have emerged. With AI technology, it is easier to mimic how people write or speak. For instance, some scammers have created 3D avatars to impersonate co-workers or clients. This is done to get targets to share sensitive information and access.

Digital asset ownership

Digital asset ownership, like property or brands, presents another risk factor for businesses and insurers to address. Typically, a business might have general liability insurance for property damage, a policy for bodily injury to third parties, property coverage for physical damage to owned property, and additional cyber insurance for data network infrastructure liability. In the metaverse, those needs are merging, presenting new challenges for the insurance industry. Digital assets, like intellectual property and brands, can be vandalized, hacked, defrauded, or stolen in the metaverse.

Revenue streams augmented by AI can also be disrupted by loss of data or connectivity. This in turn creates a business continuity risk. It is important to monitor digital risk as the adoption rate of these technologies increases because there could be increased system outages, computer glitches, and technology security breaches.

Considering risks and opportunities

Businesses and consumers are not the only ones that should consider the risks of the metaverse. Software companies and start-ups developing these technologies should also be aware of the risks. Failure for technology to deliver on a client’s expectations can create a professional liability risk. It is essential that the companies selling the products and the businesses buying the products understand what the technology is going to deliver and the return on investment.

Despite challenges , insurers like The Hartford remain optimistic about the metaverse’s future. It has the ability to aide research and development testing on large-scale projects – like a power plant safety scenario – which is easier, safer, and less expensive in a virtual environment than live.

Insurance for the metaverse

With so much that is still unfamiliar though, companies have a lot to explore with the metaverse. While it is advantageous to be open to this new technology, it would be wise to be cautious with its implementation.

Insurance has general liability that covers property damage and bodily injury, as well as property coverage for physical damage and cyber policies for intangible things, which are typically three separate policies. However, with the metaverse, insurance carriers have to contend with a world where these three distinct coverages are merging. Businesses must understand that there is a lot that insurance carriers still need to explore in the digital space. In addition, as companies consider integrating the metaverse and its new technology, it would be practical for business leaders to be cautious to ensure decisions are well-informed in order to help protect their company from risks.

Andrew Zarkowsky is Technology Industry Practice Leader for The Hartford. He has more than two decades of experience in insurance, holding various leadership roles in underwriting.

Michael Kearney is Head of Emerging Technology & Innovation for The Hartford. He has more than 30 years in technology roles as a software engineer, CIO, and management consultant.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts

Insurance-technology

Specific Technologies Driving Insurtech Investment in 2024

Understanding the Funding Decline The decrease in funding does not necessarily spell trouble for the insurance sector but instead highlights a strategic shift, the report suggests. “The insurance industry, like many sectors, is focusing on the most promising ventures with substantial insurance potential,” the report explains. “Insurers are directing their investments toward key areas and current trends such as embedded insurance, employee benefits, and cyber risk management. This strategic investment approach signals a forward-looking mindset within the industry.” Three Key Insurtech Trends for 2024 The report identifies three major trends shaping insurtech investments in 2024: Public Insurtech Companies: Financial and Growth Strategies The report also notes that public insurtech companies are prioritizing revenue growth as their main goal. These firms are restructuring their financial strategies to boost cash flow and capitalize on rising revenue streams. Their growth prospects are supported by expanding asset portfolios and strong market demand. “Public insurtech companies are focusing on revenue growth and optimizing their financial frameworks to increase cash flow,” the report states. “The growth potential for these companies is driven by increasing revenue opportunities, broadening asset bases, and a robust market for their services.” In summary, while global insurtech funding saw a decline in 2023, the industry’s focus on GenAI, digital process management, and connected insurance technologies is setting the stage for a dynamic and forward-looking 2024.

Read More
Business

Insurer Secures Unanimous Supreme Court Victory in New York Choice of Law Dispute

In the world of sports, a clean sweep, a shutout, or a perfect game is the ultimate achievement. In the legal arena, a unanimous decision from the U.S. Supreme Court is equally rare and significant. In a notable legal triumph, Great Lakes Insurance SE achieved a unanimous 9-0 victory in the Supreme Court on February 21, 2024. This victory follows a protracted legal battle that began in the District Court of Pennsylvania, advanced to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and culminated in the Supreme Court’s decisive ruling. Background of the Case: Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Company The heart of the dispute was the insurance contract’s clause selecting New York law to govern any future legal conflicts. Although the financial implications of this case were relatively minor compared to the broader marine insurance industry, the insurer’s determination to uphold a crucial maritime legal principle has significant long-term implications for marine insurance. Faced with the insured’s counterclaims—including allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, insurance bad faith, and violations of Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices Law—the insurer was confronted with serious risks. Such claims could lead to the shifting of attorney’s fees, treble damages, and more, which might normally encourage insurers to settle rather than risk pursuing justice. However, Great Lakes Insurance, supported by The Goldman Maritime Law Group, opted to challenge the Third Circuit’s decision and seek clarity from the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Ruling: A Landmark Decision In a landmark ruling, Justice Brett Kavanaugh affirmed that choice of law provisions in maritime contracts should be upheld by default. This ruling is a major victory for establishing a consistent federal standard in maritime law and avoiding a patchwork of state laws that could complicate marine insurance disputes. The Supreme Court’s decision overturned the Third Circuit’s earlier judgment, which had questioned whether Pennsylvania’s public policy concerns might override the insurance contract’s choice of New York law. By upholding the New York choice of law clause, the Supreme Court eliminated the extra-contractual bad faith claims under Pennsylvania law, thereby ensuring that the dispute could be resolved based on the merits of the insurance claim itself. Significance of the Supreme Court’s Decision This ruling represents a significant advancement in maritime law, affirming that choice of law clauses in maritime contracts are generally enforceable. The decision establishes a clear, uniform legal framework for resolving maritime contract disputes, which will streamline the process and ensure fair adjudication of future insurance claims. Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion was particularly notable for its criticism of the 1955 Wilburn Boat v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance decision, which had previously influenced maritime insurance law. Thomas argued that Wilburn Boat was incorrectly decided and stressed that a uniform and enforceable set of rules is essential for the development of maritime law. Impact on the Marine Insurance Industry The Supreme Court’s decision sets a “bright-line” rule affirming that choice of law clauses are valid unless there is a strong argument against the selected jurisdiction. By endorsing New York’s insurance laws as a reasonable choice, the ruling supports a more consistent and predictable legal environment for marine insurers. This decision represents a major step forward in maritime law, helping insurers better assess risks, determine premiums, and ensure fair and efficient resolution of maritime insurance disputes.

Read More
Try your instant quote