Close this search box.

How to prepare financially for wildfires, insurance coverages, and rebuilding

backlit-breathing-apparatus-danger-dangerous-279979 (1)

How to prepare financially for wildfires, insurance coverages, and rebuilding

Coming off consecutive years of the worst wildfire seasons in recorded U.S. history, at-risk states face high-stakes in the 2020 season.

As of late 2019, there were 775,654 residential properties at extreme risk of wildfire damage in the U.S. with a combined reconstruction cost value of over $221 billion, according to CoreLogic’s 2019 wildfire risk report.

State officials and insurance companies have urged at-risk residents to actively build more resilient communities and properties to defend against worsening wildfire risks and protect their assets with proper insurance coverage.

A recent webinar from the Insurance Information Institute (I.I.I.) and the American Property Casualty Insurance Association (APCIA) tackled wildfire insurance concerns and offered guidance on how to prepare financially for wildfires and related insurance coverages, including premium concerns from the shopping stage to the end of the claims process.

Presenters Nicole Mahrt-Ganley of the APCIA and Janet Ruiz of I.I.I. offered guidance on how to read a homeowners insurance policy, understand policy deductibles, and the factors to consider when determining how much insurance coverage to purchase.

Ruiz and Mahrt-Ganley discussed how insurers assess a home’s risk to wildfires through sophisticated technology and on-site inspections as well as the ways an insurer calculates homeowners insurance premiums based on the home’s loss history, location, age, size, and its construction type and quality. They also provided tips on how to develop an inventory of a household’s personal possessions, steps to take if a homeowners insurance policy is non-renewed, and how to navigate the insurance claims process.

Understand how much coverage you need

In the event of a claim, there are three main buckets where insurance payouts come from.

Coverage A covers the cost of rebuilding the structure of a home. Coverage B covers the cost of rebuilding detached structures like a garage. Coverage C covers all the contents or belongings inside the house, such as furniture, silverware, towels, and all that stuff.

To ensure coverage needs are met, Mahrt-Ganley urges homeowners to pick up the phone and talk to their agent or company every year and double-check that their policy is up to date.

There are a few other details to talk to an agent or company about each year, as well, Mahrt-Ganley added.

Make sure that the square footage is right on the policy, along with the type of roof and siding and the number of bedrooms, bathrooms, windows, doors and fireplaces. Talk to folks in the area to understand what the local construction costs are.

Another element to consider, Mahrt-Ganley advises, is that land is generally not covered in a policy: “If your home is lost, you can sell that.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts


Specific Technologies Driving Insurtech Investment in 2024

Understanding the Funding Decline The decrease in funding does not necessarily spell trouble for the insurance sector but instead highlights a strategic shift, the report suggests. “The insurance industry, like many sectors, is focusing on the most promising ventures with substantial insurance potential,” the report explains. “Insurers are directing their investments toward key areas and current trends such as embedded insurance, employee benefits, and cyber risk management. This strategic investment approach signals a forward-looking mindset within the industry.” Three Key Insurtech Trends for 2024 The report identifies three major trends shaping insurtech investments in 2024: Public Insurtech Companies: Financial and Growth Strategies The report also notes that public insurtech companies are prioritizing revenue growth as their main goal. These firms are restructuring their financial strategies to boost cash flow and capitalize on rising revenue streams. Their growth prospects are supported by expanding asset portfolios and strong market demand. “Public insurtech companies are focusing on revenue growth and optimizing their financial frameworks to increase cash flow,” the report states. “The growth potential for these companies is driven by increasing revenue opportunities, broadening asset bases, and a robust market for their services.” In summary, while global insurtech funding saw a decline in 2023, the industry’s focus on GenAI, digital process management, and connected insurance technologies is setting the stage for a dynamic and forward-looking 2024.

Read More

Insurer Secures Unanimous Supreme Court Victory in New York Choice of Law Dispute

In the world of sports, a clean sweep, a shutout, or a perfect game is the ultimate achievement. In the legal arena, a unanimous decision from the U.S. Supreme Court is equally rare and significant. In a notable legal triumph, Great Lakes Insurance SE achieved a unanimous 9-0 victory in the Supreme Court on February 21, 2024. This victory follows a protracted legal battle that began in the District Court of Pennsylvania, advanced to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and culminated in the Supreme Court’s decisive ruling. Background of the Case: Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Company The heart of the dispute was the insurance contract’s clause selecting New York law to govern any future legal conflicts. Although the financial implications of this case were relatively minor compared to the broader marine insurance industry, the insurer’s determination to uphold a crucial maritime legal principle has significant long-term implications for marine insurance. Faced with the insured’s counterclaims—including allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, insurance bad faith, and violations of Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices Law—the insurer was confronted with serious risks. Such claims could lead to the shifting of attorney’s fees, treble damages, and more, which might normally encourage insurers to settle rather than risk pursuing justice. However, Great Lakes Insurance, supported by The Goldman Maritime Law Group, opted to challenge the Third Circuit’s decision and seek clarity from the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Ruling: A Landmark Decision In a landmark ruling, Justice Brett Kavanaugh affirmed that choice of law provisions in maritime contracts should be upheld by default. This ruling is a major victory for establishing a consistent federal standard in maritime law and avoiding a patchwork of state laws that could complicate marine insurance disputes. The Supreme Court’s decision overturned the Third Circuit’s earlier judgment, which had questioned whether Pennsylvania’s public policy concerns might override the insurance contract’s choice of New York law. By upholding the New York choice of law clause, the Supreme Court eliminated the extra-contractual bad faith claims under Pennsylvania law, thereby ensuring that the dispute could be resolved based on the merits of the insurance claim itself. Significance of the Supreme Court’s Decision This ruling represents a significant advancement in maritime law, affirming that choice of law clauses in maritime contracts are generally enforceable. The decision establishes a clear, uniform legal framework for resolving maritime contract disputes, which will streamline the process and ensure fair adjudication of future insurance claims. Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion was particularly notable for its criticism of the 1955 Wilburn Boat v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance decision, which had previously influenced maritime insurance law. Thomas argued that Wilburn Boat was incorrectly decided and stressed that a uniform and enforceable set of rules is essential for the development of maritime law. Impact on the Marine Insurance Industry The Supreme Court’s decision sets a “bright-line” rule affirming that choice of law clauses are valid unless there is a strong argument against the selected jurisdiction. By endorsing New York’s insurance laws as a reasonable choice, the ruling supports a more consistent and predictable legal environment for marine insurers. This decision represents a major step forward in maritime law, helping insurers better assess risks, determine premiums, and ensure fair and efficient resolution of maritime insurance disputes.

Read More
Try your instant quote