Search
Close this search box.

How mobility data is driving the future of transportation

adult-black-caucasian-1061579

How mobility data is driving the future of transportation

Mobile devices are now on the cusp of disrupting what might arguably be their most impressive feat yet — the notoriously staid, and unfailingly constant insurance industry — right from the palm of our hands.

Mobile devices also are at the center of the distraction that is wreaking havoc on the transportation system, as well as our systems and ways of thinking. Yet, these devices can help solve this very issue, serving as the link to understanding driver behavior through mobility data — not as a model but in real life, in real time.

To move at the speed of the consumer, insurers must move beyond traditional data used for years and tap into the power of mobility data to create more relevant experiences, as well as a deeper, more accurate understanding of risk.

Mobility data vs. device data

Telematics data from on-board diagnostics (OBDs) proved the concept of usage-based insurance, but cost held it back from mass adoption. Now, mobile data can deliver in accuracy and insights.

OBD data does a good job verifying mileage as well as speeding, hard braking, aggressive turns and time of day that a vehicle is driven, and all of this information is useful. But what it can’t do is tell you who is driving the car during different trips or if the driver is distracted, whether it be sending texts at 65 mph or checking a navigation app at a red light.

Mobile data captures meaningful driving behavior for individual drivers, including distracted driving phone handling, which is a more predictive metric than verified mileage or credit history. Telematics models have shown us that not all distracted driving behaviors are equally risky, naturally resulting in varying levels of loss for insurers.

For example, mobile data distinguishes between phone usage at a red light vs texting while driving. It can also apply more contextual data such as real-time traffic. All these actions will help to define a more accurate risk profile

Many insurers are scrambling to accumulate the driver data needed in order to build more accurate pricing models that reflect distracted driving behaviors. And the fact of the matter is, most insurers simply don’t have the data — or the data science and technological means — to accrue mobility data down to the distracted driver level or at a scale that would create accurate models.

If you’re serious about pricing risk more accurately today, as well as into the future, consider a third-party data partner that has already build a platform, partnerships and data model (a.k.a. driver score) that is based upon real claims data and accounts for both distracted driving and loss.

Adoption vs. extinction

The automotive insurance industry is ripe for an overhaul to its business model. Not only can customers be targeted by companies with more advanced pricing, but by the change of car ownership moving towards shared mobility use cases. By strategically leveraging the right data, insurers can go on the offensive, instead of becoming victims of the evolving transportation ecosystem. Insurers must become increasingly responsive to the changing needs of their customers by harnessing the power of mobile data. Then create insurance products and solutions that take the changing landscape into account, while empowering customers to experience a whole new world of options.

Overall, the insurance industry must evolve to remain relevant and profitable as the nature of mobility changes at a breakneck pace. Understanding how to mobilize mobility data is at the center of the industry’s survival, and we must act now.

Gary Hallgren is the president of Arity, a technology company focused on making transportation smarter, safer and more useful by transforming data into actionable insights to help partners better predict risk. Hallgren has more than 20 years of industry experience in connected cars, telematics and usage-based insurance.

These opinions are the author’s own.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts

Insurance-technology

Specific Technologies Driving Insurtech Investment in 2024

Understanding the Funding Decline The decrease in funding does not necessarily spell trouble for the insurance sector but instead highlights a strategic shift, the report suggests. “The insurance industry, like many sectors, is focusing on the most promising ventures with substantial insurance potential,” the report explains. “Insurers are directing their investments toward key areas and current trends such as embedded insurance, employee benefits, and cyber risk management. This strategic investment approach signals a forward-looking mindset within the industry.” Three Key Insurtech Trends for 2024 The report identifies three major trends shaping insurtech investments in 2024: Public Insurtech Companies: Financial and Growth Strategies The report also notes that public insurtech companies are prioritizing revenue growth as their main goal. These firms are restructuring their financial strategies to boost cash flow and capitalize on rising revenue streams. Their growth prospects are supported by expanding asset portfolios and strong market demand. “Public insurtech companies are focusing on revenue growth and optimizing their financial frameworks to increase cash flow,” the report states. “The growth potential for these companies is driven by increasing revenue opportunities, broadening asset bases, and a robust market for their services.” In summary, while global insurtech funding saw a decline in 2023, the industry’s focus on GenAI, digital process management, and connected insurance technologies is setting the stage for a dynamic and forward-looking 2024.

Read More
Business

Insurer Secures Unanimous Supreme Court Victory in New York Choice of Law Dispute

In the world of sports, a clean sweep, a shutout, or a perfect game is the ultimate achievement. In the legal arena, a unanimous decision from the U.S. Supreme Court is equally rare and significant. In a notable legal triumph, Great Lakes Insurance SE achieved a unanimous 9-0 victory in the Supreme Court on February 21, 2024. This victory follows a protracted legal battle that began in the District Court of Pennsylvania, advanced to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and culminated in the Supreme Court’s decisive ruling. Background of the Case: Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Company The heart of the dispute was the insurance contract’s clause selecting New York law to govern any future legal conflicts. Although the financial implications of this case were relatively minor compared to the broader marine insurance industry, the insurer’s determination to uphold a crucial maritime legal principle has significant long-term implications for marine insurance. Faced with the insured’s counterclaims—including allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, insurance bad faith, and violations of Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices Law—the insurer was confronted with serious risks. Such claims could lead to the shifting of attorney’s fees, treble damages, and more, which might normally encourage insurers to settle rather than risk pursuing justice. However, Great Lakes Insurance, supported by The Goldman Maritime Law Group, opted to challenge the Third Circuit’s decision and seek clarity from the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Ruling: A Landmark Decision In a landmark ruling, Justice Brett Kavanaugh affirmed that choice of law provisions in maritime contracts should be upheld by default. This ruling is a major victory for establishing a consistent federal standard in maritime law and avoiding a patchwork of state laws that could complicate marine insurance disputes. The Supreme Court’s decision overturned the Third Circuit’s earlier judgment, which had questioned whether Pennsylvania’s public policy concerns might override the insurance contract’s choice of New York law. By upholding the New York choice of law clause, the Supreme Court eliminated the extra-contractual bad faith claims under Pennsylvania law, thereby ensuring that the dispute could be resolved based on the merits of the insurance claim itself. Significance of the Supreme Court’s Decision This ruling represents a significant advancement in maritime law, affirming that choice of law clauses in maritime contracts are generally enforceable. The decision establishes a clear, uniform legal framework for resolving maritime contract disputes, which will streamline the process and ensure fair adjudication of future insurance claims. Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion was particularly notable for its criticism of the 1955 Wilburn Boat v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance decision, which had previously influenced maritime insurance law. Thomas argued that Wilburn Boat was incorrectly decided and stressed that a uniform and enforceable set of rules is essential for the development of maritime law. Impact on the Marine Insurance Industry The Supreme Court’s decision sets a “bright-line” rule affirming that choice of law clauses are valid unless there is a strong argument against the selected jurisdiction. By endorsing New York’s insurance laws as a reasonable choice, the ruling supports a more consistent and predictable legal environment for marine insurers. This decision represents a major step forward in maritime law, helping insurers better assess risks, determine premiums, and ensure fair and efficient resolution of maritime insurance disputes.

Read More
Try your instant quote