Search
Close this search box.

Insurers sue ice cream maker over coverage for listeria cases

Blue-Bell-ice-cream.jpg-image620x372

Insurers sue ice cream maker over coverage for listeria cases

The case stems from allegations that company officers “knowingly disregarded contamination risk and safety compliance” regulation.

Insurers have sued Blue Bell Creameries USA and other defendants in Texas Western District Court alleging that their policies do not provide coverage for a Listeria outbreak involving the ice cream products.

Alleging that their client’s policies do not provide coverage for a listeria outbreak, Travelers and Discover Property & Casualty Insurance have sued Blue Bell Creameries USA and other defendants in Texas Western District Court.

According to the complaint, over three years after a shareholder sued the officers and directors of Blue Bell for the financial ruin that befell Blue Bell in the wake of a widespread 2015 listeria outbreak, which prompted a recall, the Blue Bell Entities tendered the suit, wrongfully claiming that it was a suit for bodily injury that triggered coverage under its commercial general liability policies.

The original shareholder complaint alleges that the officers “knowingly disregarded contamination risk and safety compliance and continued the company’s production and distribution of ice cream,” despite positive test results for listeria. It also alleges that the board of directors “willfully failed to exercise [their] fundamental authority to govern management and institute a system of controls for legal compliance and safe operations of the company.”

The complaint argues that there can be no coverage under the policies because the shareholder suit is not a suit for damages because of “bodily injury,” and instead it is a suit for equitable and other relief resulting from a breach of fiduciary duty. The insurers also argue that there can be no coverage under the policies because the shareholder suit does not seek to hold any insured under the policies legally liable for damages. The allegations are that the officers and directors, in breach of their fiduciary duties, engaged in knowing and willful misconduct, which caused Blue Bell and its shareholders to suffer financial harm.

Furthermore, the complaint notes, in the event that Blue Bell could establish that the underlying suit is for “damages because of bodily injury” there would still be no coverage because any alleged bodily injury was not caused by a covered occurrence. The suit instead alleges intentional, non-accidental conduct on the part of the officers and directors.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts

Commercial P&C Insurance

Commercial Office Space Set for a Strong Comeback

The sustained increase in demand for office space across the nation since late 2022 suggests that the market has moved past its lowest point, according to insights from the real estate technology platform, VTS. Demand for office space began to rise in late 2022 and continued into early 2023. Since then, the office market has experienced a period of stability and growth, supported by favorable economic factors, indicating a market rebound. This conclusion is drawn from the VTS Office Demand Index (VODI), which tracks unique new tenant tour requests for office properties in key U.S. markets. The VODI serves as an early indicator of future office leasing activity. According to the index, demand for office space has grown consistently over the past 12 months, closing the second quarter with a 17% year-over-year increase and a 34% rise from the VODI’s lowest point in December 2022. A significant shift in office-based employment patterns further supports the belief that demand for office space has stabilized. After reaching its peak in August 2022, office-based employment declined by 3.9% in early 2024. However, this trend has since stabilized, and employment growth has remained steady. Additionally, a recent decrease in work-from-home rates has fueled the renewed demand for office space. “They say you can only recognize a market bottom after it has passed, and the office space market is no exception. Following what we now see as the bottom, the national demand has gradually increased, though it remains susceptible to economic challenges,” said Nick Romito, CEO of VTS. “However, the growth observed in VODI over the past 18 months, coupled with positive trends in the office-using workforce, suggests that the market has reset, and the worst is behind us.” It’s important to note that this national trend does not impact all local markets equally. Cities like Los Angeles and New York City have seen healthy growth in office space demand, while markets such as San Francisco and Washington, D.C., have experienced prolonged stagnation. In Los Angeles, office space demand surged in the second quarter, briefly surpassing pre-COVID levels, driven by an increase in the average size of office spaces sought by tenants. New York City followed a similar overall pattern, though with some softness in the second quarter. Conversely, San Francisco’s demand for office space remains unpredictable, largely due to its tech-focused workforce, which continues to favor remote work more than other industries. “Markets heavily dependent on the tech sector, like San Francisco and Seattle, are on a markedly different post-COVID recovery path compared to more diversified markets like Los Angeles and New York City. It may take some time before we see office demand in San Francisco and Seattle return to pre-COVID levels,” added Ryan Masiello, Chief Strategy Officer at VTS.

Read More
Cyber Liability

Global IT Outage Puts Business Interruption Insurance in the Spotlight

In July, a global IT outage had a significant impact on business interruption insurance policies, overshadowing the effects on cyber insurance coverages. “This incident wasn’t a result of a malicious attack, which is why typical cyber insurance policies may not have been activated,” explained Peter McMurtrie, a partner in West Monroe’s insurance sector, in an interview with PropertyCasualty360.com. “Where coverage was applicable, factors like deductible amounts, waiting periods, and coverage limits played a critical role in determining the extent of exposure,” McMurtrie noted. “Standard policies for small businesses were less likely to offer coverage, while more complex policies for mid-sized companies and Fortune 500 corporations may have included broader triggers for non-malicious outages caused by third-party software issues.” The outage was triggered by a software update on July 19, 2024, by cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike, which affected organizations worldwide using Microsoft Windows. This interruption had far-reaching consequences, including disrupting hospital systems, media outlets, financial institutions, delaying thousands of flights, and halting daily business operations. McMurtrie emphasized that while the initial impact of the outage was similar for both large and small businesses, the ability to recover operations and whether insurance covered the loss of business income varied. “Larger companies are more likely to have advanced disaster recovery plans that ensure service redundancy following unexpected outages,” he added. “Their insurance programs also tend to cover a wider range of incidents.” According to Microsoft, the CrowdStrike update error affected over 8.5 million Windows devices globally. The incident highlighted the interconnected nature of our global ecosystem, including cloud providers, software platforms, security services, and their clients. “It’s a stark reminder of the importance of prioritizing safe deployment and disaster recovery across the tech industry,” the company said in a blog post. McMurtrie pointed out that the outage’s widespread impact was largely due to its effect on organizations that are critical to societal infrastructure—sectors like agriculture, airlines, banking, energy, government, healthcare, manufacturing, and retail. “Insurance companies base their risk appetite on their ability to understand and price risks appropriately. This becomes increasingly challenging with emerging threats,” he said. “However, I anticipate that insurers will respond by clarifying policy language, refining risk selection criteria, and possibly developing new products specifically designed for this evolving exposure.”

Read More
Try your instant quote