Search
Close this search box.

How mobility data is driving the future of transportation

adult-black-caucasian-1061579

How mobility data is driving the future of transportation

Mobile devices are now on the cusp of disrupting what might arguably be their most impressive feat yet — the notoriously staid, and unfailingly constant insurance industry — right from the palm of our hands.

Mobile devices also are at the center of the distraction that is wreaking havoc on the transportation system, as well as our systems and ways of thinking. Yet, these devices can help solve this very issue, serving as the link to understanding driver behavior through mobility data — not as a model but in real life, in real time.

To move at the speed of the consumer, insurers must move beyond traditional data used for years and tap into the power of mobility data to create more relevant experiences, as well as a deeper, more accurate understanding of risk.

Mobility data vs. device data

Telematics data from on-board diagnostics (OBDs) proved the concept of usage-based insurance, but cost held it back from mass adoption. Now, mobile data can deliver in accuracy and insights.

OBD data does a good job verifying mileage as well as speeding, hard braking, aggressive turns and time of day that a vehicle is driven, and all of this information is useful. But what it can’t do is tell you who is driving the car during different trips or if the driver is distracted, whether it be sending texts at 65 mph or checking a navigation app at a red light.

Mobile data captures meaningful driving behavior for individual drivers, including distracted driving phone handling, which is a more predictive metric than verified mileage or credit history. Telematics models have shown us that not all distracted driving behaviors are equally risky, naturally resulting in varying levels of loss for insurers.

For example, mobile data distinguishes between phone usage at a red light vs texting while driving. It can also apply more contextual data such as real-time traffic. All these actions will help to define a more accurate risk profile

Many insurers are scrambling to accumulate the driver data needed in order to build more accurate pricing models that reflect distracted driving behaviors. And the fact of the matter is, most insurers simply don’t have the data — or the data science and technological means — to accrue mobility data down to the distracted driver level or at a scale that would create accurate models.

If you’re serious about pricing risk more accurately today, as well as into the future, consider a third-party data partner that has already build a platform, partnerships and data model (a.k.a. driver score) that is based upon real claims data and accounts for both distracted driving and loss.

Adoption vs. extinction

The automotive insurance industry is ripe for an overhaul to its business model. Not only can customers be targeted by companies with more advanced pricing, but by the change of car ownership moving towards shared mobility use cases. By strategically leveraging the right data, insurers can go on the offensive, instead of becoming victims of the evolving transportation ecosystem. Insurers must become increasingly responsive to the changing needs of their customers by harnessing the power of mobile data. Then create insurance products and solutions that take the changing landscape into account, while empowering customers to experience a whole new world of options.

Overall, the insurance industry must evolve to remain relevant and profitable as the nature of mobility changes at a breakneck pace. Understanding how to mobilize mobility data is at the center of the industry’s survival, and we must act now.

Gary Hallgren is the president of Arity, a technology company focused on making transportation smarter, safer and more useful by transforming data into actionable insights to help partners better predict risk. Hallgren has more than 20 years of industry experience in connected cars, telematics and usage-based insurance.

These opinions are the author’s own.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts

Commercial P&C Insurance

Commercial Office Space Set for a Strong Comeback

The sustained increase in demand for office space across the nation since late 2022 suggests that the market has moved past its lowest point, according to insights from the real estate technology platform, VTS. Demand for office space began to rise in late 2022 and continued into early 2023. Since then, the office market has experienced a period of stability and growth, supported by favorable economic factors, indicating a market rebound. This conclusion is drawn from the VTS Office Demand Index (VODI), which tracks unique new tenant tour requests for office properties in key U.S. markets. The VODI serves as an early indicator of future office leasing activity. According to the index, demand for office space has grown consistently over the past 12 months, closing the second quarter with a 17% year-over-year increase and a 34% rise from the VODI’s lowest point in December 2022. A significant shift in office-based employment patterns further supports the belief that demand for office space has stabilized. After reaching its peak in August 2022, office-based employment declined by 3.9% in early 2024. However, this trend has since stabilized, and employment growth has remained steady. Additionally, a recent decrease in work-from-home rates has fueled the renewed demand for office space. “They say you can only recognize a market bottom after it has passed, and the office space market is no exception. Following what we now see as the bottom, the national demand has gradually increased, though it remains susceptible to economic challenges,” said Nick Romito, CEO of VTS. “However, the growth observed in VODI over the past 18 months, coupled with positive trends in the office-using workforce, suggests that the market has reset, and the worst is behind us.” It’s important to note that this national trend does not impact all local markets equally. Cities like Los Angeles and New York City have seen healthy growth in office space demand, while markets such as San Francisco and Washington, D.C., have experienced prolonged stagnation. In Los Angeles, office space demand surged in the second quarter, briefly surpassing pre-COVID levels, driven by an increase in the average size of office spaces sought by tenants. New York City followed a similar overall pattern, though with some softness in the second quarter. Conversely, San Francisco’s demand for office space remains unpredictable, largely due to its tech-focused workforce, which continues to favor remote work more than other industries. “Markets heavily dependent on the tech sector, like San Francisco and Seattle, are on a markedly different post-COVID recovery path compared to more diversified markets like Los Angeles and New York City. It may take some time before we see office demand in San Francisco and Seattle return to pre-COVID levels,” added Ryan Masiello, Chief Strategy Officer at VTS.

Read More
Cyber Liability

Global IT Outage Puts Business Interruption Insurance in the Spotlight

In July, a global IT outage had a significant impact on business interruption insurance policies, overshadowing the effects on cyber insurance coverages. “This incident wasn’t a result of a malicious attack, which is why typical cyber insurance policies may not have been activated,” explained Peter McMurtrie, a partner in West Monroe’s insurance sector, in an interview with PropertyCasualty360.com. “Where coverage was applicable, factors like deductible amounts, waiting periods, and coverage limits played a critical role in determining the extent of exposure,” McMurtrie noted. “Standard policies for small businesses were less likely to offer coverage, while more complex policies for mid-sized companies and Fortune 500 corporations may have included broader triggers for non-malicious outages caused by third-party software issues.” The outage was triggered by a software update on July 19, 2024, by cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike, which affected organizations worldwide using Microsoft Windows. This interruption had far-reaching consequences, including disrupting hospital systems, media outlets, financial institutions, delaying thousands of flights, and halting daily business operations. McMurtrie emphasized that while the initial impact of the outage was similar for both large and small businesses, the ability to recover operations and whether insurance covered the loss of business income varied. “Larger companies are more likely to have advanced disaster recovery plans that ensure service redundancy following unexpected outages,” he added. “Their insurance programs also tend to cover a wider range of incidents.” According to Microsoft, the CrowdStrike update error affected over 8.5 million Windows devices globally. The incident highlighted the interconnected nature of our global ecosystem, including cloud providers, software platforms, security services, and their clients. “It’s a stark reminder of the importance of prioritizing safe deployment and disaster recovery across the tech industry,” the company said in a blog post. McMurtrie pointed out that the outage’s widespread impact was largely due to its effect on organizations that are critical to societal infrastructure—sectors like agriculture, airlines, banking, energy, government, healthcare, manufacturing, and retail. “Insurance companies base their risk appetite on their ability to understand and price risks appropriately. This becomes increasingly challenging with emerging threats,” he said. “However, I anticipate that insurers will respond by clarifying policy language, refining risk selection criteria, and possibly developing new products specifically designed for this evolving exposure.”

Read More
Try your instant quote