Close this search box.

Workers Compensation in the COVID World


Workers Compensation in the COVID World

When the coronavirus hit earlier this year and it became obvious that many individuals were at risk of becoming infected, several states amended their rules for Workers Compensation benefits payouts to include healthcare and frontline workers exposed to the virus and then quarantined. Compensability for occupational diseases varies per state with some statutes excluding “ordinary diseases of life,” such as the common cold and flu. Additionally, in some cases, it may be difficult for employees to prove they contracted the coronavirus at work. As a result, executive orders and/or bills were passed in many states to address how Workers Compensation will respond during the pandemic.

Presumption Laws and Workers Compensation

California Governor Gavin Newsom in May, for example, passed an executive order creating a rebuttable presumption for an employee’s COVID-19-related illness that arose out of the course of employment to obtain Workers Comp benefits. In order for the presumption to apply, an employee must have been diagnosed with COVID-19 or tested positive for it within 14 days after performing work for the employer, at a location other than the employee’s home, between March 19, 2020, and July 5, 2020. The presumption could be disputed and challenged by “other evidence.” The order applied to all essential workers, with employees entitled to full Workers Comp benefits, including hospital, surgical, medical treatment, disability indemnity, and death benefits.

The Workers’ Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California estimated in May that COVID-19-related claims will cost employers and insurers around $2 billion, with the average claim paid amounting to $29,000. Since then, however, according to data from the California Department of Industrial Relations, Workers Compensation claims for COVID-19 have spiked dramatically from about 4,700 in May to about 10,900 in June and more than 11,600 in July, which could mean that costs could exceed the original $2 billion estimate.

California’s Governor Signs New Law

Moreover, on September 17, Governor Newsom signed a new law (as the previous law expired in July) relaxing the burden of proof to receive Workers Compensation benefits for some employees who contract COVID-19 on the job. Under this law, employees will be presumed to have contracted COVID-19 on the job if there was an outbreak at work. The new law defines an outbreak as five or more employees contracting the virus within a 14-day period at workplaces with 5 to 100 employees and 5% of employees contracting the novel coronavirus at a worksite with more than 100 employees within two weeks.

New Jersey Is Most Recent State to Pass Presumption Legislation

Many other states have also changed their Workers Compensation rules to include a rebuttable presumption for employees who contracted COVID-19 during the course of employment. The rule in some states only applies to healthcare workers and police officers while other states have a broader definition for COVID-19-infected employees who are eligible for coverage.

New Jersey is the most recent state to pass legislation for essential employees, each of whom is defined as “an employee in the public or private sector during a state of emergency.” These employees include first responders and individuals providing medical and other healthcare services. They also include those “performing functions which involve physical proximity to members of the public and are essential to the public’s health, safety, and welfare, including transportation services, hotel and other residential services, financial services, and the production, preparation, storage, sale, and distribution of essential goods such as food, beverages, medicine, fuel, and supplies for conducting essential business and work at home.”

COVID-Related Workers Comp Estimates in the Billions

The National Council on Compensation Insurance (NCCI) earlier this year projected that potential COVID-19-related Workers Compensation costs could range from $2.2 billion under a best-case scenario up to $81 billion under a worst-case scenario. These projections are for the 38 states and District of Columbia in which NCCI tracks claims data. NCCI projections don’t factor in permanent disability costs.

The state of the Workers Comp market may be even further impacted depending on the long-term health effects of the virus on individuals and the costs involved. This remains to be seen with insurers keeping their eye on scientific data as it becomes known. It’s important to stress that businesses should take all precautions and measures necessary, including following OSHA and CDC COVID-related guidelines, to keep employees safe.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts


Specific Technologies Driving Insurtech Investment in 2024

Understanding the Funding Decline The decrease in funding does not necessarily spell trouble for the insurance sector but instead highlights a strategic shift, the report suggests. “The insurance industry, like many sectors, is focusing on the most promising ventures with substantial insurance potential,” the report explains. “Insurers are directing their investments toward key areas and current trends such as embedded insurance, employee benefits, and cyber risk management. This strategic investment approach signals a forward-looking mindset within the industry.” Three Key Insurtech Trends for 2024 The report identifies three major trends shaping insurtech investments in 2024: Public Insurtech Companies: Financial and Growth Strategies The report also notes that public insurtech companies are prioritizing revenue growth as their main goal. These firms are restructuring their financial strategies to boost cash flow and capitalize on rising revenue streams. Their growth prospects are supported by expanding asset portfolios and strong market demand. “Public insurtech companies are focusing on revenue growth and optimizing their financial frameworks to increase cash flow,” the report states. “The growth potential for these companies is driven by increasing revenue opportunities, broadening asset bases, and a robust market for their services.” In summary, while global insurtech funding saw a decline in 2023, the industry’s focus on GenAI, digital process management, and connected insurance technologies is setting the stage for a dynamic and forward-looking 2024.

Read More

Insurer Secures Unanimous Supreme Court Victory in New York Choice of Law Dispute

In the world of sports, a clean sweep, a shutout, or a perfect game is the ultimate achievement. In the legal arena, a unanimous decision from the U.S. Supreme Court is equally rare and significant. In a notable legal triumph, Great Lakes Insurance SE achieved a unanimous 9-0 victory in the Supreme Court on February 21, 2024. This victory follows a protracted legal battle that began in the District Court of Pennsylvania, advanced to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and culminated in the Supreme Court’s decisive ruling. Background of the Case: Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Company The heart of the dispute was the insurance contract’s clause selecting New York law to govern any future legal conflicts. Although the financial implications of this case were relatively minor compared to the broader marine insurance industry, the insurer’s determination to uphold a crucial maritime legal principle has significant long-term implications for marine insurance. Faced with the insured’s counterclaims—including allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, insurance bad faith, and violations of Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices Law—the insurer was confronted with serious risks. Such claims could lead to the shifting of attorney’s fees, treble damages, and more, which might normally encourage insurers to settle rather than risk pursuing justice. However, Great Lakes Insurance, supported by The Goldman Maritime Law Group, opted to challenge the Third Circuit’s decision and seek clarity from the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Ruling: A Landmark Decision In a landmark ruling, Justice Brett Kavanaugh affirmed that choice of law provisions in maritime contracts should be upheld by default. This ruling is a major victory for establishing a consistent federal standard in maritime law and avoiding a patchwork of state laws that could complicate marine insurance disputes. The Supreme Court’s decision overturned the Third Circuit’s earlier judgment, which had questioned whether Pennsylvania’s public policy concerns might override the insurance contract’s choice of New York law. By upholding the New York choice of law clause, the Supreme Court eliminated the extra-contractual bad faith claims under Pennsylvania law, thereby ensuring that the dispute could be resolved based on the merits of the insurance claim itself. Significance of the Supreme Court’s Decision This ruling represents a significant advancement in maritime law, affirming that choice of law clauses in maritime contracts are generally enforceable. The decision establishes a clear, uniform legal framework for resolving maritime contract disputes, which will streamline the process and ensure fair adjudication of future insurance claims. Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion was particularly notable for its criticism of the 1955 Wilburn Boat v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance decision, which had previously influenced maritime insurance law. Thomas argued that Wilburn Boat was incorrectly decided and stressed that a uniform and enforceable set of rules is essential for the development of maritime law. Impact on the Marine Insurance Industry The Supreme Court’s decision sets a “bright-line” rule affirming that choice of law clauses are valid unless there is a strong argument against the selected jurisdiction. By endorsing New York’s insurance laws as a reasonable choice, the ruling supports a more consistent and predictable legal environment for marine insurers. This decision represents a major step forward in maritime law, helping insurers better assess risks, determine premiums, and ensure fair and efficient resolution of maritime insurance disputes.

Read More
Try your instant quote