Search
Close this search box.

Why selecting diverse law firms makes sense for insurers

pexels-august-de-richelieu-4427626

Why selecting diverse law firms makes sense for insurers

Changing law firms is always risky, and asking an insurer to leave a longstanding relationship due to a firm’s lack of diversity is difficult.

When you’re arguing a bad-faith case in a tough jurisdiction, you can’t afford mistakes that could alienate your jurors. Years ago, a senior partner and I defended a bad-faith case before a racially diverse jury. The senior partner planned to make a comment in his opening argument that may have seemed relatively mild, but I knew the African American jurors could take it the wrong way. I talked to him about it, and he made the same point differently. We watched as a few jurors nodded appreciatively.

This is why law firm diversity matters to insurers. The more diverse a law firm is, the better it can represent its clients. Law firm diversity can lead to meaningful settlements in mediation and arbitration, as a diverse attorney can build trust with diverse plaintiffs. At trial, it enables insurers to relate to diverse juries. Diversity can even help in document review. When I was a junior associate, I noticed a phrase in a document that my colleagues missed. That phrase ultimately helped convince the plaintiff to withdraw her lawsuit.

Like most worthwhile tasks, law firm diversity is easier said than done. Last January, a New York Times article reported on a LinkedIn post touting a prominent law firm’s incoming partner class, which included 11 white men and one white woman. The alarming lack of diversity led a leading legal website to write an open letter — signed by major global employers — calling on the firm to “reflect the diversity of the legal community.” But when the Times reporter asked one of the letter writers if she’d fire her company’s longtime counsel if his firm weren’t diverse enough, she said, “I trust him so much, I can’t see walking away.”

Understand unconscious bias

Changing law firms is always risky, and asking an insurer to leave a longstanding attorney due to a firm’s lack of diversity is difficult. But it’s also hard to spark change when you’ve worked with the same people since 1975. In 2020, with protesters demanding social justice and the Black Lives Matter movement taking hold, embracing law firms with a proven track record of diversity is imperative.

Unfortunately, law firms have a long way to go toward increasing diversity. They should start now by taking a long, hard look at themselves and how they groom their young minority associates for future partner or equity partner status. These promotions aren’t about billable hours or even quality of work; they’re about how well senior partners relate to their associates. And partners naturally gravitate toward people from their own gender, race or sexual orientation.

A 2014 experiment demonstrated how this type of unconscious bias can disguise itself as an objective evaluation. A leadership consulting company sent a memo with 22 errors to 60 partners at 22 law firms. The memos were identical. But half the recipients were told a white person wrote the memo; the other half were told an African American person wrote it. Attorneys receiving the “white” memo rated the writer 4.1 out of 5. Attorneys receiving the “African American” memo rated the writer a 3.2 out of 5. One can imagine that these same attorneys would consequently give the “white” memo writer more opportunities and career support than the equally qualified African American writer.

Law firms can reduce the impact of unconscious bias by actively seeking out and promoting women and people of color. For example, Dan Kohane, past president of the Federation for Defense & Corporate Counsel (FDCC) noticed me at a conference and invited me to an FDCC event. There, he introduced me to another past president, Tim Pratt, and they invited me to apply. Today, I’m a proud member of FDCC’s Board of Directors, co-chair of its Data Privacy section, and vice-chair of its Diversity Committee, all because someone actively sought me out.

Most firms still use the same recruitment techniques they did in 1975, and unsurprisingly, get the same results. Firms should shake up the status quo by recruiting from historically Black colleges and universities, asking law schools’ Black student associations for their best and brightest, and seeking recommendations from African American professors.

Achieving diversity at law firms will not be easy. It will not take months, but years. You may or may not have to break up with your long-time counsel to make it happen. But you should consider the value diverse counsel can bring to your business. It will send an important message to law firms at a pivotal time in history.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts

Insurance-technology

Specific Technologies Driving Insurtech Investment in 2024

Understanding the Funding Decline The decrease in funding does not necessarily spell trouble for the insurance sector but instead highlights a strategic shift, the report suggests. “The insurance industry, like many sectors, is focusing on the most promising ventures with substantial insurance potential,” the report explains. “Insurers are directing their investments toward key areas and current trends such as embedded insurance, employee benefits, and cyber risk management. This strategic investment approach signals a forward-looking mindset within the industry.” Three Key Insurtech Trends for 2024 The report identifies three major trends shaping insurtech investments in 2024: Public Insurtech Companies: Financial and Growth Strategies The report also notes that public insurtech companies are prioritizing revenue growth as their main goal. These firms are restructuring their financial strategies to boost cash flow and capitalize on rising revenue streams. Their growth prospects are supported by expanding asset portfolios and strong market demand. “Public insurtech companies are focusing on revenue growth and optimizing their financial frameworks to increase cash flow,” the report states. “The growth potential for these companies is driven by increasing revenue opportunities, broadening asset bases, and a robust market for their services.” In summary, while global insurtech funding saw a decline in 2023, the industry’s focus on GenAI, digital process management, and connected insurance technologies is setting the stage for a dynamic and forward-looking 2024.

Read More
Business

Insurer Secures Unanimous Supreme Court Victory in New York Choice of Law Dispute

In the world of sports, a clean sweep, a shutout, or a perfect game is the ultimate achievement. In the legal arena, a unanimous decision from the U.S. Supreme Court is equally rare and significant. In a notable legal triumph, Great Lakes Insurance SE achieved a unanimous 9-0 victory in the Supreme Court on February 21, 2024. This victory follows a protracted legal battle that began in the District Court of Pennsylvania, advanced to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and culminated in the Supreme Court’s decisive ruling. Background of the Case: Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Company The heart of the dispute was the insurance contract’s clause selecting New York law to govern any future legal conflicts. Although the financial implications of this case were relatively minor compared to the broader marine insurance industry, the insurer’s determination to uphold a crucial maritime legal principle has significant long-term implications for marine insurance. Faced with the insured’s counterclaims—including allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, insurance bad faith, and violations of Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices Law—the insurer was confronted with serious risks. Such claims could lead to the shifting of attorney’s fees, treble damages, and more, which might normally encourage insurers to settle rather than risk pursuing justice. However, Great Lakes Insurance, supported by The Goldman Maritime Law Group, opted to challenge the Third Circuit’s decision and seek clarity from the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Ruling: A Landmark Decision In a landmark ruling, Justice Brett Kavanaugh affirmed that choice of law provisions in maritime contracts should be upheld by default. This ruling is a major victory for establishing a consistent federal standard in maritime law and avoiding a patchwork of state laws that could complicate marine insurance disputes. The Supreme Court’s decision overturned the Third Circuit’s earlier judgment, which had questioned whether Pennsylvania’s public policy concerns might override the insurance contract’s choice of New York law. By upholding the New York choice of law clause, the Supreme Court eliminated the extra-contractual bad faith claims under Pennsylvania law, thereby ensuring that the dispute could be resolved based on the merits of the insurance claim itself. Significance of the Supreme Court’s Decision This ruling represents a significant advancement in maritime law, affirming that choice of law clauses in maritime contracts are generally enforceable. The decision establishes a clear, uniform legal framework for resolving maritime contract disputes, which will streamline the process and ensure fair adjudication of future insurance claims. Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion was particularly notable for its criticism of the 1955 Wilburn Boat v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance decision, which had previously influenced maritime insurance law. Thomas argued that Wilburn Boat was incorrectly decided and stressed that a uniform and enforceable set of rules is essential for the development of maritime law. Impact on the Marine Insurance Industry The Supreme Court’s decision sets a “bright-line” rule affirming that choice of law clauses are valid unless there is a strong argument against the selected jurisdiction. By endorsing New York’s insurance laws as a reasonable choice, the ruling supports a more consistent and predictable legal environment for marine insurers. This decision represents a major step forward in maritime law, helping insurers better assess risks, determine premiums, and ensure fair and efficient resolution of maritime insurance disputes.

Read More
Try your instant quote