Close this search box.

UPC insurance company was ordered to end its operations – Skyscraper Response.


UPC insurance company was ordered to end its operations – Skyscraper Response.

UPC, a Florida property and casualty insurance company licensed in Texas, was ordered to end its operations by Florida state officials and the Second Judicial Circuit Court of Leon County, Florida.

UPC’s insurance policies will be canceled effective 12:01 a.m. on March 29, 2023. If you are a policyholder, this is when your policy will end unless your policy ends earlier than that day under the terms of your policy.

Skyscraper Insurance has established a committee to deal with this crisis and help every individual policyholder be replaced with strong-standing carriers. We are also here to help not just our existing Skyscarper clients but any policyholder from UPC Insurance reach out to our dedicated managing representative

Bankrupt Florida property insurer placed into receivership

Florida regulators have initiated the process to place United Property & Casualty Insurance Company (UPC) into receivership.

According to documents from Florida’s Office of Insurance Regulation (OIR), the state’s interim Insurance Commissioner Michael Yaworksy sent a letter to Chief Financial Officer Jimmy Patronis to trigger the procedure that will lead to securing court approval to place UPC into receivership. UPC had also agreed to the decision.

Last August, the St. Petersburg, FL-based UPC announced that it would exit Florida’s homeowners’ insurance market. Tampa Bay Times reported that another insurer, Slide Insurance, took on 72,000 of UPC’s policies earlier this month.

A document filed with the SEC on February 06, 2023 indicated that UPC had about 135,000 policies in Florida before Slide took over a portion of them. In another SEC filing on February 10, parent company United Insurance Holdings Corporation said that UPC was expected to be placed into receivership due to insolvency.

“United was deemed insolvent on February 6, 2023, because if all of the assets of United, if made immediately available, would be insufficient to discharge all of the liabilities of United,” OIR Property & Casualty Financial Oversight director Virginia Christy said in an affidavit attached to Yaworksy’s letter.

Christy’s affidavit also noted that UPC had net underwriting losses of over $35 million each year since 2017.

While UPC was still in business last year, industry experts saw the writing on the wall when Demotech downgraded the insurer’s rating from “A” to “M” last year. Demotech eventually withdrew UPC’s rating in late August 2022 – a sign that the Insurance Information Institute took to mean that UPC would join Florida’s growing list of insolvent property insurers.

A total of six insurers were placed into receivership in 2022 due to insolvencies.

What are your thoughts about UPC being placed into receivership? And what’s next for Florida’s property market? Let us know in the comments below.

Related stories:

Thousands of UPC policyholders in Florida will lose their homeowners’ insurance at the end of the month as the St. Petersburg-based carrier has become insolvent. 

UPC, doing business as United Property and Casualty Insurance, will cancel its policies by March 29; however, Tampa-based insurance firm Slide has acquired the exclusive renewal rights for over 91,400 Florida homeowners insurance policies from UPC.

Slide, one of the top homeowner insurers with an A-rated financial stability score, will begin covering eligible customers immediately following the cancellation of their UPC policies.

“It will be a seamless process for policyholders if Slide assumes their policy. There will not be any premium changes until the policy is renewed,” said Mark Friedlander, Insurance Information Institute (Triple-i) director of corporate communications. 

Slide will continue to provide coverage through the expiration of the policyholder’s current policy term. If someone has already paid their premium no action is required, according to Slide, which has created a landing page for UPC policyholders, answering their questions. 

While Slide is navigating the transferring process, other questions loom regarding previously filed claims and policies not covered/assumed by Slide.

“The big issue will be what happens with the roughly 20,000 outstanding claims related to hurricane damages. We know those filed before Feb. 1 will be taken over by FIGA [Florida Insurance Guaranty Association]. Slide will not be responsible for assuming those claims,” Friedlander said. 

FIGA manages pending claims by or against Florida policyholders of insurance companies that become insolvent or liquidated. 

Meanwhile, the remaining 53,000 UPC policyholders have received 30-day notices to find a new insurer. 

“When we first heard about UPC’s plan to do an orderly runoff, it didn’t seem feasible to us and now they have been declared insolvent. We forewarned policyholders to not wait until they receive a letter to find a new insurer,” he said about the ominous writing on the wall. 

UPC is the seventh insurance company to exit Florida in 2022, continuing the trend of instability in the market. 

As of this year, the Office of Insurance Regulation has put 23 other unstable insurers on its “watch list.” 

“The market was in such turmoil before regulations were passed. There’s no immediate fix. It’s going to take time for the market to stabilize, and we will have to suffer until then,” Friedlander said, explaining litigation issues on top of Florida’s numerous natural disasters have caused insurers to hike rates. 

The average home insurance cost in Florida is $4,218, which is nearly $1,441 more than the national average of $2,777, according to 

Friedlander said most of the affected UPC customers, predominantly in the Tampa and South Florida markets, will likely seek coverage from the state-backed Citizens Property Insurance Corp. The taxpayer-subsidized insurer will require a completely new policy, and by comparison will be less costly than a private insurer. 

Citizens is projecting to reach 1.7 million policies by year’s end, as it added nearly 30,000 new customers per month – a new record for the insurer. 

As Florida continues to be considered a high-risk market for insurers, there’s a greater need for competition, especially as 15% of homeowners are uninsured, according to Triple-i. 

“A lot of retirees are on fixed incomes and paid for their homes in cash; thereby, they are not required to have a mortgage,” Friedlander said. “After Hurricane Irma, a lot of homeowners exited insurance plans, even those who have seven-figure-priced homes decided to self-insure.” 

Although flood insurance only requires people to have flood insurance on property inside a flood zone, storm surges are still common, and FEMA (the Federal Emergency Management Agency) is not an insurance replacement, or as Friedland puts it, “they are not cutting you a check to replace your home.”

Reach out to us today!

Naomy Fray
Personal Lines Underwriter Team Leader 
O: 212.470.1953 X 208
 F: 646.774.3269 | W: 
E:  | L: follow us on LinkedIn

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts


Specific Technologies Driving Insurtech Investment in 2024

Understanding the Funding Decline The decrease in funding does not necessarily spell trouble for the insurance sector but instead highlights a strategic shift, the report suggests. “The insurance industry, like many sectors, is focusing on the most promising ventures with substantial insurance potential,” the report explains. “Insurers are directing their investments toward key areas and current trends such as embedded insurance, employee benefits, and cyber risk management. This strategic investment approach signals a forward-looking mindset within the industry.” Three Key Insurtech Trends for 2024 The report identifies three major trends shaping insurtech investments in 2024: Public Insurtech Companies: Financial and Growth Strategies The report also notes that public insurtech companies are prioritizing revenue growth as their main goal. These firms are restructuring their financial strategies to boost cash flow and capitalize on rising revenue streams. Their growth prospects are supported by expanding asset portfolios and strong market demand. “Public insurtech companies are focusing on revenue growth and optimizing their financial frameworks to increase cash flow,” the report states. “The growth potential for these companies is driven by increasing revenue opportunities, broadening asset bases, and a robust market for their services.” In summary, while global insurtech funding saw a decline in 2023, the industry’s focus on GenAI, digital process management, and connected insurance technologies is setting the stage for a dynamic and forward-looking 2024.

Read More

Insurer Secures Unanimous Supreme Court Victory in New York Choice of Law Dispute

In the world of sports, a clean sweep, a shutout, or a perfect game is the ultimate achievement. In the legal arena, a unanimous decision from the U.S. Supreme Court is equally rare and significant. In a notable legal triumph, Great Lakes Insurance SE achieved a unanimous 9-0 victory in the Supreme Court on February 21, 2024. This victory follows a protracted legal battle that began in the District Court of Pennsylvania, advanced to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and culminated in the Supreme Court’s decisive ruling. Background of the Case: Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Company The heart of the dispute was the insurance contract’s clause selecting New York law to govern any future legal conflicts. Although the financial implications of this case were relatively minor compared to the broader marine insurance industry, the insurer’s determination to uphold a crucial maritime legal principle has significant long-term implications for marine insurance. Faced with the insured’s counterclaims—including allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, insurance bad faith, and violations of Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices Law—the insurer was confronted with serious risks. Such claims could lead to the shifting of attorney’s fees, treble damages, and more, which might normally encourage insurers to settle rather than risk pursuing justice. However, Great Lakes Insurance, supported by The Goldman Maritime Law Group, opted to challenge the Third Circuit’s decision and seek clarity from the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Ruling: A Landmark Decision In a landmark ruling, Justice Brett Kavanaugh affirmed that choice of law provisions in maritime contracts should be upheld by default. This ruling is a major victory for establishing a consistent federal standard in maritime law and avoiding a patchwork of state laws that could complicate marine insurance disputes. The Supreme Court’s decision overturned the Third Circuit’s earlier judgment, which had questioned whether Pennsylvania’s public policy concerns might override the insurance contract’s choice of New York law. By upholding the New York choice of law clause, the Supreme Court eliminated the extra-contractual bad faith claims under Pennsylvania law, thereby ensuring that the dispute could be resolved based on the merits of the insurance claim itself. Significance of the Supreme Court’s Decision This ruling represents a significant advancement in maritime law, affirming that choice of law clauses in maritime contracts are generally enforceable. The decision establishes a clear, uniform legal framework for resolving maritime contract disputes, which will streamline the process and ensure fair adjudication of future insurance claims. Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion was particularly notable for its criticism of the 1955 Wilburn Boat v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance decision, which had previously influenced maritime insurance law. Thomas argued that Wilburn Boat was incorrectly decided and stressed that a uniform and enforceable set of rules is essential for the development of maritime law. Impact on the Marine Insurance Industry The Supreme Court’s decision sets a “bright-line” rule affirming that choice of law clauses are valid unless there is a strong argument against the selected jurisdiction. By endorsing New York’s insurance laws as a reasonable choice, the ruling supports a more consistent and predictable legal environment for marine insurers. This decision represents a major step forward in maritime law, helping insurers better assess risks, determine premiums, and ensure fair and efficient resolution of maritime insurance disputes.

Read More
Try your instant quote