Close this search box.

Small & midsized companies’ risks to drive cyber insurance


Small & midsized companies’ risks to drive cyber insurance

A survey also showed just one in 10 people had very good cyber protection in place, highlighting a growing need for personal cyber coverage.

When it comes to cybersecurity, only a quarter felt all employees had responsibility for cybersecurity, Munich Re reported, which noted cyberattacks often start by targeting an individual employee. Most C-level execs said IT departments are responsible for avoiding cyber incidents.

Small and midsized companies are expected to see a disproportionate volume of cyber incidents, in turn driving a bulk of the demand for cyber insurance, according to a survey from Munich Re, which expects the market to hit a value of approximately $20 billion by 2025.

The Global Cyber Risk and Insurance Survey polled nearly 2,000 C-suite executives and found that slightly more than 80% said their company is not adequately protected from cyberthreats. In fact, just around 10% of all respondents already had a cyber policy in place. However, there were regional differences in this, as 20% of C-level executives in Australia said they had cyber coverage.

While many executives feel unprepared for threats, 35% said they are considering cyber insurance policies, and most say they will likely follow through.

Further, 35% have reached out to an insurance professional about cyber coverage. Again, regional differences are seen with executives in China and Brazil showed considerably more interest in integrating cyber protection.

When it comes to cybersecurity, only a quarter felt all employees had responsibility for cybersecurity, Munich Re reported, which noted cyberattacks often start by targeting an individual employee. Most C-level execs said IT departments are responsible for avoiding cyber incidents, while 15% said senior management should take the lead.

Interest growing in personal protection

Although awareness of the threat of cyberattacks on a personal level is high, just one in 10 people said they have very good cyber protection in place. Munich Re suggests some consumer education could go a long way, as 87% of respondents said they have never been offered a cyber policy to cover themselves or their families.

Globally, respondents in Brazil and China voiced the most concern about online fraud and misinformation. In fact, 78% of respondents in China said they were already a private cyber victim. Across all attack vectors, 50% of study participants said they were the victim of a cyberattack.

The following is an application for insurance. Fill out every question and please be honest. The information you provide will be relied on in determining acceptability, coverage, and/or price of insurance. If you have any trouble, live chat is available or you can email your insurance agent at Skyscraper insurance Services, Inc.. Once you complete the application, your agent will reach out with any quotes or additional questions we may have. Thank you for your business.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts


Specific Technologies Driving Insurtech Investment in 2024

Understanding the Funding Decline The decrease in funding does not necessarily spell trouble for the insurance sector but instead highlights a strategic shift, the report suggests. “The insurance industry, like many sectors, is focusing on the most promising ventures with substantial insurance potential,” the report explains. “Insurers are directing their investments toward key areas and current trends such as embedded insurance, employee benefits, and cyber risk management. This strategic investment approach signals a forward-looking mindset within the industry.” Three Key Insurtech Trends for 2024 The report identifies three major trends shaping insurtech investments in 2024: Public Insurtech Companies: Financial and Growth Strategies The report also notes that public insurtech companies are prioritizing revenue growth as their main goal. These firms are restructuring their financial strategies to boost cash flow and capitalize on rising revenue streams. Their growth prospects are supported by expanding asset portfolios and strong market demand. “Public insurtech companies are focusing on revenue growth and optimizing their financial frameworks to increase cash flow,” the report states. “The growth potential for these companies is driven by increasing revenue opportunities, broadening asset bases, and a robust market for their services.” In summary, while global insurtech funding saw a decline in 2023, the industry’s focus on GenAI, digital process management, and connected insurance technologies is setting the stage for a dynamic and forward-looking 2024.

Read More

Insurer Secures Unanimous Supreme Court Victory in New York Choice of Law Dispute

In the world of sports, a clean sweep, a shutout, or a perfect game is the ultimate achievement. In the legal arena, a unanimous decision from the U.S. Supreme Court is equally rare and significant. In a notable legal triumph, Great Lakes Insurance SE achieved a unanimous 9-0 victory in the Supreme Court on February 21, 2024. This victory follows a protracted legal battle that began in the District Court of Pennsylvania, advanced to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and culminated in the Supreme Court’s decisive ruling. Background of the Case: Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Company The heart of the dispute was the insurance contract’s clause selecting New York law to govern any future legal conflicts. Although the financial implications of this case were relatively minor compared to the broader marine insurance industry, the insurer’s determination to uphold a crucial maritime legal principle has significant long-term implications for marine insurance. Faced with the insured’s counterclaims—including allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, insurance bad faith, and violations of Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices Law—the insurer was confronted with serious risks. Such claims could lead to the shifting of attorney’s fees, treble damages, and more, which might normally encourage insurers to settle rather than risk pursuing justice. However, Great Lakes Insurance, supported by The Goldman Maritime Law Group, opted to challenge the Third Circuit’s decision and seek clarity from the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Ruling: A Landmark Decision In a landmark ruling, Justice Brett Kavanaugh affirmed that choice of law provisions in maritime contracts should be upheld by default. This ruling is a major victory for establishing a consistent federal standard in maritime law and avoiding a patchwork of state laws that could complicate marine insurance disputes. The Supreme Court’s decision overturned the Third Circuit’s earlier judgment, which had questioned whether Pennsylvania’s public policy concerns might override the insurance contract’s choice of New York law. By upholding the New York choice of law clause, the Supreme Court eliminated the extra-contractual bad faith claims under Pennsylvania law, thereby ensuring that the dispute could be resolved based on the merits of the insurance claim itself. Significance of the Supreme Court’s Decision This ruling represents a significant advancement in maritime law, affirming that choice of law clauses in maritime contracts are generally enforceable. The decision establishes a clear, uniform legal framework for resolving maritime contract disputes, which will streamline the process and ensure fair adjudication of future insurance claims. Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion was particularly notable for its criticism of the 1955 Wilburn Boat v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance decision, which had previously influenced maritime insurance law. Thomas argued that Wilburn Boat was incorrectly decided and stressed that a uniform and enforceable set of rules is essential for the development of maritime law. Impact on the Marine Insurance Industry The Supreme Court’s decision sets a “bright-line” rule affirming that choice of law clauses are valid unless there is a strong argument against the selected jurisdiction. By endorsing New York’s insurance laws as a reasonable choice, the ruling supports a more consistent and predictable legal environment for marine insurers. This decision represents a major step forward in maritime law, helping insurers better assess risks, determine premiums, and ensure fair and efficient resolution of maritime insurance disputes.

Read More
Try your instant quote