Search
Close this search box.

Multifamily insurance rates are up as much as 28% Or More.

multifamily

Multifamily insurance rates are up as much as 28% Or More.

The average year-over-year hike was 13.6% and was worse in some places.

As GlobeSt.com has previously reported, higher financing costs are not the only fiscal strain on CRE in general and multifamily specifically. Operating expenses have risen sharply and are unlikely to recede with a receding inflation tide. Prices will stay up.

That’s bad news for many operators because the increases pare away at net operating income, which puts pressure on debt service coverage ratio. That makes lenders uncomfortable and can derail attempts to refinance.

Trepp has been looking at where the biggest impacts on multifamily have been, like the metros facing the biggest property tax increases. And now they have another report on property insurance.

“Trepp finds that the cost of property insurance increased roughly 13.6% on average across the 50 largest MSAs from 2021 to 2022, with a few key southern multifamily markets seeing particularly pronounced insurance expense growth,” the company said. Look at the top 15 multifamily and the bottom rate growth in 2022 was 15.1% in Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC, while the top in the nation, Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL, saw 28.0%.

It takes little prodding to see what might be driving expenses far behind the rapid increases. “The year 2021 witnessed record-breaking frequency and severity of natural disasters, such as hurricanes, floods, and wildfires,” Trepp wrote. “Consequently, property owners have faced heightened risks of climate-related property damage. In response to these escalating risks, insurers have found themselves compelled to reevaluate their policies and pricing models, leading to fluctuations in insurance premiums for properties. Our previous report on real estate taxes highlighted the booming nature of the multifamily market in certain growing MSAs. This trend may also further contribute to even higher insurance premiums for multifamily properties.”

It could also be worse. State Farm in late May said it would “cease accepting new applications including all business and personal lines property and casualty insurance … due to historic increases in construction costs outpacing inflation, rapidly growing catastrophe exposure, and a challenging reinsurance market.”

Allstate in November 2022 had announced that it was exiting commercial insurance in five states.

Trepp took a closer look at Florida and Texas.

Florida’s location makes it a natural target of tropical storms and hurricanes, “with the Miami, Jacksonville, and Tampa MSAs experiencing an average rise of 24.9% in insurance expenses from 2021 to 2022.” There were 21 named storms, outpacing the norm of 14. Building materials costs have escalated more than 31% between 2020 and 2022. And yet, people keep moving there. “Miami has the highest flood-risk score in the U.S., but there were 147 multifamily buildings totaling 36,414 units under construction in 2021,” Trepp wrote. “This construction volume represented 11.3% of the inventory in the Miami market, with the vacancy rate dropping to sub-5% in that period.”

“The distinctive aspect of Texas’ weather lies in its extremes, with both scorching hot conditions and rare freezing temperatures impacting the region,” Trepp wrote. Whether the severe winter storm that devastated large swaths and took down power capability, with $9.3 billion payout, the April “Gorilla” hailstorm in the northern part of the state, or Hurricane Nicholas in September 2021, insurance companies started to bail out of the state.

“In the short term, this rise can be attributed to inflation, at least in part,” wrote Trepp. “However, it is essential to recognize that extreme weather has played a crucial role in reshaping the insurance premium landscape in the past several years.” And an incoming wave of private capital might direct companies to focus on more profitable areas and leave higher risk ones.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts

Insurance-technology

Specific Technologies Driving Insurtech Investment in 2024

Understanding the Funding Decline The decrease in funding does not necessarily spell trouble for the insurance sector but instead highlights a strategic shift, the report suggests. “The insurance industry, like many sectors, is focusing on the most promising ventures with substantial insurance potential,” the report explains. “Insurers are directing their investments toward key areas and current trends such as embedded insurance, employee benefits, and cyber risk management. This strategic investment approach signals a forward-looking mindset within the industry.” Three Key Insurtech Trends for 2024 The report identifies three major trends shaping insurtech investments in 2024: Public Insurtech Companies: Financial and Growth Strategies The report also notes that public insurtech companies are prioritizing revenue growth as their main goal. These firms are restructuring their financial strategies to boost cash flow and capitalize on rising revenue streams. Their growth prospects are supported by expanding asset portfolios and strong market demand. “Public insurtech companies are focusing on revenue growth and optimizing their financial frameworks to increase cash flow,” the report states. “The growth potential for these companies is driven by increasing revenue opportunities, broadening asset bases, and a robust market for their services.” In summary, while global insurtech funding saw a decline in 2023, the industry’s focus on GenAI, digital process management, and connected insurance technologies is setting the stage for a dynamic and forward-looking 2024.

Read More
Business

Insurer Secures Unanimous Supreme Court Victory in New York Choice of Law Dispute

In the world of sports, a clean sweep, a shutout, or a perfect game is the ultimate achievement. In the legal arena, a unanimous decision from the U.S. Supreme Court is equally rare and significant. In a notable legal triumph, Great Lakes Insurance SE achieved a unanimous 9-0 victory in the Supreme Court on February 21, 2024. This victory follows a protracted legal battle that began in the District Court of Pennsylvania, advanced to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and culminated in the Supreme Court’s decisive ruling. Background of the Case: Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Company The heart of the dispute was the insurance contract’s clause selecting New York law to govern any future legal conflicts. Although the financial implications of this case were relatively minor compared to the broader marine insurance industry, the insurer’s determination to uphold a crucial maritime legal principle has significant long-term implications for marine insurance. Faced with the insured’s counterclaims—including allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, insurance bad faith, and violations of Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices Law—the insurer was confronted with serious risks. Such claims could lead to the shifting of attorney’s fees, treble damages, and more, which might normally encourage insurers to settle rather than risk pursuing justice. However, Great Lakes Insurance, supported by The Goldman Maritime Law Group, opted to challenge the Third Circuit’s decision and seek clarity from the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Ruling: A Landmark Decision In a landmark ruling, Justice Brett Kavanaugh affirmed that choice of law provisions in maritime contracts should be upheld by default. This ruling is a major victory for establishing a consistent federal standard in maritime law and avoiding a patchwork of state laws that could complicate marine insurance disputes. The Supreme Court’s decision overturned the Third Circuit’s earlier judgment, which had questioned whether Pennsylvania’s public policy concerns might override the insurance contract’s choice of New York law. By upholding the New York choice of law clause, the Supreme Court eliminated the extra-contractual bad faith claims under Pennsylvania law, thereby ensuring that the dispute could be resolved based on the merits of the insurance claim itself. Significance of the Supreme Court’s Decision This ruling represents a significant advancement in maritime law, affirming that choice of law clauses in maritime contracts are generally enforceable. The decision establishes a clear, uniform legal framework for resolving maritime contract disputes, which will streamline the process and ensure fair adjudication of future insurance claims. Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion was particularly notable for its criticism of the 1955 Wilburn Boat v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance decision, which had previously influenced maritime insurance law. Thomas argued that Wilburn Boat was incorrectly decided and stressed that a uniform and enforceable set of rules is essential for the development of maritime law. Impact on the Marine Insurance Industry The Supreme Court’s decision sets a “bright-line” rule affirming that choice of law clauses are valid unless there is a strong argument against the selected jurisdiction. By endorsing New York’s insurance laws as a reasonable choice, the ruling supports a more consistent and predictable legal environment for marine insurers. This decision represents a major step forward in maritime law, helping insurers better assess risks, determine premiums, and ensure fair and efficient resolution of maritime insurance disputes.

Read More
Try your instant quote