Search
Close this search box.

The insurance implications from the Russian invasion of Ukraine

russia ukraine

The insurance implications from the Russian invasion of Ukraine

The Russian attack on Ukraine has potential implications for the global insurance industry, and in some cases, for the U.S. insurance industry. In seeking just one word to explain these implications, that word would be “expensive.”

Already we have seen the negative financial impact worldwide from the stock market volatility, oil and commodity prices, merchant cargo and shipping costs, aviation interruptions, disruptions in the banking and investment sectors and loss of Russian imports/exports. Any country, state, territory or entity that does business with Russia will be affected financially, and in most aspects insurance coverage will not be a viable resource due to standard policy exclusions for war and military action, nuclear hazard, governmental action, and acts or decisions.

Inflationary risk

Inflationary risk has and will continue to escalate worldwide, due to the trickle-down effect of the negative financial impact. Even the state of Ohio has already seen inflationary increases due to the loss of Russian imports and exports, and this is likely to affect other states as well.

With huge jumps in imports from 2020-2021, Ohio had Russian imports of mineral fuel and oil of $22 million in 2021; fertilizers of $14.4 million; arms and ammunition of $10.7 million; and paper, paperboard and articles of paper pulp of nearly $1.9 million.

On the export side, Ohio exports to Russia reached nearly $220 million in 2021, including exports of $76.2 million in perfumery and cosmetics and $34.6 million in industrial machinery, including computers.

While these figures seem significant, Russia is number 24 on a list of importing nations to Ohio. Nam Vu, a Miami University professor of economics, in discussing the impact of Ohio with other states, sees the larger issue not being a disruption of Russia’s trading relationship, but rather the larger issue is the overall impact on inflation, “Because that can increase uncertainty, and that can price into a higher level of inflation — and that significantly will increase the recession risk, not only just for Ohio but for many other states as well.”

In reviewing recent AM Best publications on the matter, sanctions may have severe effects on oil and commodity prices, as well as tourism and the economies of less-resilient countries. It will be more challenging for the business operating environment in Russia and for firms conducting business in Russia with current sanctions, and additional sanctions being added that will complicate the situation even further. Sanctions on other financial institutions could lead to further complications or severely worsen the situation, according to Best’s Commentary.

“Further sanctions may impact the ability of international insurers and reinsurers to underwrite Russian risks or make it more difficult for them to service claims on existing policies,” said Anna Sheremeteva, financial analyst, AM Best. “Most affected would be those writing large energy and infrastructure risks, such as London Market insurers, and international reinsurers.”

Aviation insurers have lost premiums, with insurers having stopped coverage for air carriers in Ukraine in mid-February, and airlines are no longer flying in or out of Russia.

Shipping & cargo risk

Merchant ships in Ukraine have been hit, and insurers are either not offering coverage for vessels sailing the Black Sea or demanding huge premiums to do so. The Black Sea is a critical region for agricultural and oil traders, with Ukraine and Russia accounting for more than a quarter of the global trade in wheat and about one-fifth of corn. The Ukrainian ports have now been overtaken by Russia so any ships and cargo there are in jeopardy.

All of the disruptions and lack of cargo movement will only serve to further hamper the supply chain having already been impeded by Covid-19 related disruptions.

War risk

While war is not an insurable risk under traditional insurance, war risk insurance has actually been around since 1914, when the War Risk Insurance Act was passed by the United States Congress to ensure its availability for shipping vessels and individuals during WWI. In general, war risk insurance provides coverage on losses resulting from events such as war, invasions, insurrections, riots, strikes and terrorism. Details on War Risk Insurance can be found in Title 46 of the U.S. Code, Chapter 539. Many re-insurers submitted 48 hours notifications on cancellation of war risk insurance for Ukraine, beginning on Feb 11, 2022.

Political risk

Instability in a country can happen without warning, leaving investors, lenders and contractors unprepared and out of pocket. In the political upheaval, businesses may not be able to operate and their assets may be damaged, none of which would be covered by a standard insurance policy. Political risk insurance helps organizations conducting business around the world protect their assets and financial interests from monetary losses due to specified political risks.

These can be from such losses as being unable to convert currency, government interference and political violence including terrorism. Political risk insurance is designed to protect a business against arbitrary government actions such as confiscation, expropriation and nationalism; selective discrimination; forced divestiture; license cancellation and breach of contract.

It can also include coverage for loss or damage to physical assets as a result of violence, abandonment of assets or abandonment of the foreign operations as a result of political violence.

Further, political risk insurance covers the exposures of importers or exporters in differing scenarios, such as ceasing operations where exports are crucial to the business; or loss of products that only have value if exported.

As has happened with the banking and investment restrictions, political risk can respond when restrictions on foreign exchange prevents remittances relating to dividends, shareholder loan payments, inter company payables, and sale proceeds. Some coverage may be available to project lenders to protect investors against the failure of sovereign governments to meet their debt obligations due to political violence. Political risk insurance for contractors may provide coverage to construction, engineering, and other contracting firms against associated losses due to political upheaval or government action.

Taken from : https://www.propertycasualty360.com/2022/03/04/russian-attack-what-are-the-insurance-implications-414-218617/?kw=The%20insurance%20implications%20from%20the%20Russian%20invasion%20of%20Ukraine&utm_source=email&utm_medium=enl&utm_campaign=dailynews&utm_content=20220304&utm_term=pc360&enlcmp=nltrplt2

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts

Insurance-technology

Specific Technologies Driving Insurtech Investment in 2024

Understanding the Funding Decline The decrease in funding does not necessarily spell trouble for the insurance sector but instead highlights a strategic shift, the report suggests. “The insurance industry, like many sectors, is focusing on the most promising ventures with substantial insurance potential,” the report explains. “Insurers are directing their investments toward key areas and current trends such as embedded insurance, employee benefits, and cyber risk management. This strategic investment approach signals a forward-looking mindset within the industry.” Three Key Insurtech Trends for 2024 The report identifies three major trends shaping insurtech investments in 2024: Public Insurtech Companies: Financial and Growth Strategies The report also notes that public insurtech companies are prioritizing revenue growth as their main goal. These firms are restructuring their financial strategies to boost cash flow and capitalize on rising revenue streams. Their growth prospects are supported by expanding asset portfolios and strong market demand. “Public insurtech companies are focusing on revenue growth and optimizing their financial frameworks to increase cash flow,” the report states. “The growth potential for these companies is driven by increasing revenue opportunities, broadening asset bases, and a robust market for their services.” In summary, while global insurtech funding saw a decline in 2023, the industry’s focus on GenAI, digital process management, and connected insurance technologies is setting the stage for a dynamic and forward-looking 2024.

Read More
Business

Insurer Secures Unanimous Supreme Court Victory in New York Choice of Law Dispute

In the world of sports, a clean sweep, a shutout, or a perfect game is the ultimate achievement. In the legal arena, a unanimous decision from the U.S. Supreme Court is equally rare and significant. In a notable legal triumph, Great Lakes Insurance SE achieved a unanimous 9-0 victory in the Supreme Court on February 21, 2024. This victory follows a protracted legal battle that began in the District Court of Pennsylvania, advanced to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and culminated in the Supreme Court’s decisive ruling. Background of the Case: Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Company The heart of the dispute was the insurance contract’s clause selecting New York law to govern any future legal conflicts. Although the financial implications of this case were relatively minor compared to the broader marine insurance industry, the insurer’s determination to uphold a crucial maritime legal principle has significant long-term implications for marine insurance. Faced with the insured’s counterclaims—including allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, insurance bad faith, and violations of Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices Law—the insurer was confronted with serious risks. Such claims could lead to the shifting of attorney’s fees, treble damages, and more, which might normally encourage insurers to settle rather than risk pursuing justice. However, Great Lakes Insurance, supported by The Goldman Maritime Law Group, opted to challenge the Third Circuit’s decision and seek clarity from the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Ruling: A Landmark Decision In a landmark ruling, Justice Brett Kavanaugh affirmed that choice of law provisions in maritime contracts should be upheld by default. This ruling is a major victory for establishing a consistent federal standard in maritime law and avoiding a patchwork of state laws that could complicate marine insurance disputes. The Supreme Court’s decision overturned the Third Circuit’s earlier judgment, which had questioned whether Pennsylvania’s public policy concerns might override the insurance contract’s choice of New York law. By upholding the New York choice of law clause, the Supreme Court eliminated the extra-contractual bad faith claims under Pennsylvania law, thereby ensuring that the dispute could be resolved based on the merits of the insurance claim itself. Significance of the Supreme Court’s Decision This ruling represents a significant advancement in maritime law, affirming that choice of law clauses in maritime contracts are generally enforceable. The decision establishes a clear, uniform legal framework for resolving maritime contract disputes, which will streamline the process and ensure fair adjudication of future insurance claims. Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion was particularly notable for its criticism of the 1955 Wilburn Boat v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance decision, which had previously influenced maritime insurance law. Thomas argued that Wilburn Boat was incorrectly decided and stressed that a uniform and enforceable set of rules is essential for the development of maritime law. Impact on the Marine Insurance Industry The Supreme Court’s decision sets a “bright-line” rule affirming that choice of law clauses are valid unless there is a strong argument against the selected jurisdiction. By endorsing New York’s insurance laws as a reasonable choice, the ruling supports a more consistent and predictable legal environment for marine insurers. This decision represents a major step forward in maritime law, helping insurers better assess risks, determine premiums, and ensure fair and efficient resolution of maritime insurance disputes.

Read More
Try your instant quote