Search
Close this search box.

Ransomware attacks are hitting local governments. Here’s how they can fight back.

pexels-markus-spiske-113850

Ransomware attacks are hitting local governments. Here’s how they can fight back.

“The odds of a municipality becoming a cyber victim are one in four,” one cybersecurity expert said.

The emails showing up on office computers asked about a recent Amazon order. Local government employees in various South Jersey towns were told to click to see the status of the order.

“And most people will click that,” said Lou Romero, a cybersecurity expert. “And my question is, ‘Did you order anything on Amazon? [No.] Then why are you clicking on it?’”

But had such an email come from a malicious source, a municipality’s whole system could have been compromised. The town’s ability to function could have been held hostage for a ransom. Romero has seen it happen.

Ransomware has targeted more than 70 local and state governments so far this year, according to a report by researchers at Barracuda, an IT security company. Among those hit were municipalities in Florida and Texas, and Baltimore, where hackers locked away critical files. Baltimore didn’t pay the ransom, but officials said the attack will cost the city $18 million. In July, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security partnered with national groups to urge governments to take advantage of the best practices and resources to protect themselves.

“These evolving and sophisticated attacks are damaging and costly,” the Barracuda researchers wrote. “They can cripple day-to-day operations, cause chaos, and result in financial losses from downtime, ransom payments, recovery costs, and other unbudgeted and unanticipated expenses.”

Because most municipalities don’t have millions to spend on cybersecurity the way big corporations do, they can be easy prey, Romero said. Several local governments in the region, wary of attacks, declined to talk about their cybersecurity strategies.

“The odds of a municipality becoming a cyber victim are one in four,” said Romero, a consultant for 64 South Jersey municipalities. “So it’s not a matter of if, it’s only a matter of time.”

It’s not that municipalities are being attacked by ransomware more often than individuals and corporations, said Eric Cornelius, chief product officer for BlackBerry’s Cylance, which sells cybersecurity software and services.

“It’s that everyone is being attacked by ransomware more often,” he said.

But attacks against local governments can keep them from delivering a variety of vital services to thousands of residents.

In cybersecurity, local governments are playing catch-up

An employee at a maintenance yard in Haverford Township, Delaware County, got an email with a subject line that seemed off. But it was just enough to be a tease. The worker clicked it.

“And that’s all it took,” said Rick Maclary, the township’s IT director.

A message popped up saying that someone had the computer’s files and the township had to pay a ransom to get them back. The office didn’t store vital information, but when Haverford didn’t pay the ransom, the employee lost contacts and about a month’s worth of data, which the township had not backed up. That was about six years ago.

“That’s when we really learned our lesson that we had to get more serious” about cybersecurity, Maclary said.

Cyberattackers aim to hold systems hostage so local governments can’t operate until they pay a ransom — they are called “denial of service” attacks.

Two years ago, Romero assessed more than 200 small- and medium-sized municipalities in New Jersey. More than 85% had poor password policies, such as allowing fewer than eight characters, not setting expiration dates, or not locking accounts after failed password attempts. Only 4% had any type of cybersecurity awareness training. Municipalities are far behind the private sector, even though ongoing attacks have spurred improvements among the New Jersey towns since 2017.

Attackers, too, are getting more sophisticated, even sending emails that are specific to departments, said Jerry Mascia, Mount Laurel’s superintendent of public works. For example, the permitting department will get an email that says, “Attached is my application to erect a fence.” But it’s malware that infects the municipality’s system once someone opens it.

The challenge for municipalities is figuring out how to maximize their IT security with limited budgets, Romero said. Many local governments don’t have dedicated IT departments and don’t have the resources to attract skilled IT staff, cybersecurity experts said.

‘Cyber hygiene’: Invest in systems, training, and policies

“They are better off spending the money on good-quality cyber hygiene than spending the money and giving it to the lawyers or ransoms,” Romero said. “Cyber hygiene” includes identifying vulnerabilities, using layers of encryption and fire walls to protect data, creating plans to prevent and react to attacks, and keeping up with the latest security patches and system upgrades.

Three municipalities that Romero works with decided to band together and pay a local high school, which has strong cybersecurity, to handle their IT needs.

Cornelius called cybersecurity “the cost of doing business in a digital world.”

“It’s important to realize security is a journey, not a destination,” he said.

He said municipal IT employees often inherit “Frankenstein” systems that are built piecemeal, and the lack of cohesion makes these systems difficult to defend.

Employee cyber training also is necessary. Haverford tells its workers not to use personal emails on township computers and relies on software that scans emails for suspicious behavior before employees see them, reducing the chances that a worker will click something dangerous. The IT department trains workers not to click on suspicious emails and to report them.

Although training is helpful, municipalities shouldn’t rely on it, said Cornelius, who said that over the last two decades, he has engaged in “a highly unsuccessful effort” to teach people not to click suspicious links and emails.

“One always gets clicked,” he said.

Municipalities should develop plans for how they’ll restore services if someone is holding their systems hostage. Few have them, Romero said.

Back up files and stay vigilant

A couple of years ago, Romero was surprised to find that a small South Jersey municipality was backing up its files only every three months, instead of every day, as experts recommend. It turns out that an employee was copying the files one-by-one onto a thumb drive. He showed her how to copy all the files at once.

When Romero advises government officials, he tells them, “Your backups are your lifeline.”

Haverford has taken its lesson to heart, backing up important information every few hours. Local governments also keep track of the periodic warnings the Department of Homeland Security shares about emerging cyberattacks.

“It’s scary the way it is,” Maclary said. “You just can’t trust anybody electronically anymore. You can’t let your guard down.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts

Insurance-technology

Specific Technologies Driving Insurtech Investment in 2024

Understanding the Funding Decline The decrease in funding does not necessarily spell trouble for the insurance sector but instead highlights a strategic shift, the report suggests. “The insurance industry, like many sectors, is focusing on the most promising ventures with substantial insurance potential,” the report explains. “Insurers are directing their investments toward key areas and current trends such as embedded insurance, employee benefits, and cyber risk management. This strategic investment approach signals a forward-looking mindset within the industry.” Three Key Insurtech Trends for 2024 The report identifies three major trends shaping insurtech investments in 2024: Public Insurtech Companies: Financial and Growth Strategies The report also notes that public insurtech companies are prioritizing revenue growth as their main goal. These firms are restructuring their financial strategies to boost cash flow and capitalize on rising revenue streams. Their growth prospects are supported by expanding asset portfolios and strong market demand. “Public insurtech companies are focusing on revenue growth and optimizing their financial frameworks to increase cash flow,” the report states. “The growth potential for these companies is driven by increasing revenue opportunities, broadening asset bases, and a robust market for their services.” In summary, while global insurtech funding saw a decline in 2023, the industry’s focus on GenAI, digital process management, and connected insurance technologies is setting the stage for a dynamic and forward-looking 2024.

Read More
Business

Insurer Secures Unanimous Supreme Court Victory in New York Choice of Law Dispute

In the world of sports, a clean sweep, a shutout, or a perfect game is the ultimate achievement. In the legal arena, a unanimous decision from the U.S. Supreme Court is equally rare and significant. In a notable legal triumph, Great Lakes Insurance SE achieved a unanimous 9-0 victory in the Supreme Court on February 21, 2024. This victory follows a protracted legal battle that began in the District Court of Pennsylvania, advanced to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and culminated in the Supreme Court’s decisive ruling. Background of the Case: Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Company The heart of the dispute was the insurance contract’s clause selecting New York law to govern any future legal conflicts. Although the financial implications of this case were relatively minor compared to the broader marine insurance industry, the insurer’s determination to uphold a crucial maritime legal principle has significant long-term implications for marine insurance. Faced with the insured’s counterclaims—including allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, insurance bad faith, and violations of Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices Law—the insurer was confronted with serious risks. Such claims could lead to the shifting of attorney’s fees, treble damages, and more, which might normally encourage insurers to settle rather than risk pursuing justice. However, Great Lakes Insurance, supported by The Goldman Maritime Law Group, opted to challenge the Third Circuit’s decision and seek clarity from the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Ruling: A Landmark Decision In a landmark ruling, Justice Brett Kavanaugh affirmed that choice of law provisions in maritime contracts should be upheld by default. This ruling is a major victory for establishing a consistent federal standard in maritime law and avoiding a patchwork of state laws that could complicate marine insurance disputes. The Supreme Court’s decision overturned the Third Circuit’s earlier judgment, which had questioned whether Pennsylvania’s public policy concerns might override the insurance contract’s choice of New York law. By upholding the New York choice of law clause, the Supreme Court eliminated the extra-contractual bad faith claims under Pennsylvania law, thereby ensuring that the dispute could be resolved based on the merits of the insurance claim itself. Significance of the Supreme Court’s Decision This ruling represents a significant advancement in maritime law, affirming that choice of law clauses in maritime contracts are generally enforceable. The decision establishes a clear, uniform legal framework for resolving maritime contract disputes, which will streamline the process and ensure fair adjudication of future insurance claims. Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion was particularly notable for its criticism of the 1955 Wilburn Boat v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance decision, which had previously influenced maritime insurance law. Thomas argued that Wilburn Boat was incorrectly decided and stressed that a uniform and enforceable set of rules is essential for the development of maritime law. Impact on the Marine Insurance Industry The Supreme Court’s decision sets a “bright-line” rule affirming that choice of law clauses are valid unless there is a strong argument against the selected jurisdiction. By endorsing New York’s insurance laws as a reasonable choice, the ruling supports a more consistent and predictable legal environment for marine insurers. This decision represents a major step forward in maritime law, helping insurers better assess risks, determine premiums, and ensure fair and efficient resolution of maritime insurance disputes.

Read More
Try your instant quote