Parametric insurance is reshaping commercial property coverage

A shift to non-traditional solutions: Parametric insurance provides an increasingly compelling alternative.

The commercial-property insurance landscape is undergoing a notable evolution, marked by a discernible shift toward non-traditional solutions.

As alternative products gain traction and bridge the gaps left by traditional coverage, one innovative approach stands out: Parametric insurance.

Also known as index-based insurance, parametric insurance policies have most frequently been implemented in developing economies. They’re also gaining momentum among U.S. businesses in disaster-prone areas.

This paradigmatic shift is not merely an adaptation to changing times; it’s a pivotal reimagining of how businesses protect their assets in the face of unpredictable risks.

The rise of parametric insurance

Unlike traditional indemnity-based insurance, which assesses losses after they occur, parametric insurance operates on predefined parameters such as wind speeds, earthquake magnitudes or rainfall levels. It functions on the principle of triggers: When a predefined event occurs, such as a certain level of seismic activity or a specified wind speed, policyholders receive a predetermined payout.

One of the defining features of parametric insurance is its ability to provide swift payouts. Traditional insurance often involves lengthy claims processes, evaluations and negotiations, causing funding delays for the affected businesses. Conversely, parametric insurance eliminates much of this bureaucracy. Since payouts are triggered by predefined events, there’s less ambiguity in assessing the damage, leading to faster disbursement of funds. This rapid injection of capital can be instrumental in facilitating quick recovery, allowing businesses to resume operations and minimize downtime, ultimately reducing the overall financial impact of the incident.

Moreover, this innovative approach offers a level of customization that traditional insurance struggles to match. Businesses can tailor their coverage precisely to their needs, selecting triggers and parameters that align with their specific vulnerabilities.

For instance, a coastal business might opt for a parametric insurance policy linked to hurricane wind speeds, ensuring they receive compensation immediately after a storm hits, regardless of the actual damage incurred. This flexible, tailored approach empowers businesses to proactively mitigate risks that are most pertinent to their operations and allows for more efficient use of insurance resources, avoiding unnecessary premiums on non-relevant risks.

Another advantage of parametric insurance is its transparency. The triggers and parameters are explicitly defined in the policy, leaving little room for disputes over whether a claim qualifies for compensation. This transparency fosters trust between insurers and policyholders, a crucial aspect in an industry where clarity and reliability are paramount.

Understanding parametric insurance pitfalls

Though businesses, especially those vulnerable to specific perils like natural disasters or market fluctuations, are recognizing the appeal of this innovative approach, parametric insurance isn’t without risks. The predetermined nature of payouts means that they might not fully align with the actual losses incurred. There could be scenarios where the triggered event doesn’t directly correlate with the actual financial impact, leaving businesses with a shortfall in coverage.

Another pitfall to consider is basis risk, where the triggering event might occur but fail to meet the predefined parameters for payout. This discrepancy between the defined triggers and the actual impact could leave businesses without the anticipated financial support precisely when they need it most.

Parametric insurance and the future of coverage

Looking ahead, the future of commercial property insurance appears increasingly intertwined with non-traditional approaches like parametric insurance. As technology advances and data analytics become more sophisticated, parametric insurance will likely become more precise, reducing basis risks and refining its ability to provide prompt, tailored coverage. However, it’s still important for policyholders to understand its nuances and limitations.

Nevertheless, while parametric insurance represents just one facet of the evolving landscape, it’s a compelling alternative to traditional indemnity-based insurance for businesses looking for an agile, proactive way to protect their assets in an increasingly unpredictable world.

Mark Pennebaker is senior vice president and Commercial Lines practice leader at Foundation Risk Partners. These opinions are the author’s own.

Specific Technologies Driving Insurtech Investment in 2024

Understanding the Funding Decline The decrease in funding does not necessarily spell trouble for the insurance sector but instead highlights a strategic shift, the report suggests. “The insurance industry, like many sectors, is focusing on the most promising ventures with substantial insurance potential,” the report explains. “Insurers are directing their investments toward key areas and current trends such as embedded insurance, employee benefits, and cyber risk management. This strategic investment approach signals a forward-looking mindset within the industry.” Three Key Insurtech Trends for 2024 The report identifies three major trends shaping insurtech investments in 2024: Public Insurtech Companies: Financial and Growth Strategies The report also notes that public insurtech companies are prioritizing revenue growth as their main goal. These firms are restructuring their financial strategies to boost cash flow and capitalize on rising revenue streams. Their growth prospects are supported by expanding asset portfolios and strong market demand. “Public insurtech companies are focusing on revenue growth and optimizing their financial frameworks to increase cash flow,” the report states. “The growth potential for these companies is driven by increasing revenue opportunities, broadening asset bases, and a robust market for their services.” In summary, while global insurtech funding saw a decline in 2023, the industry’s focus on GenAI, digital process management, and connected insurance technologies is setting the stage for a dynamic and forward-looking 2024.

Business

Insurer Secures Unanimous Supreme Court Victory in New York Choice of Law Dispute

In the world of sports, a clean sweep, a shutout, or a perfect game is the ultimate achievement. In the legal arena, a unanimous decision from the U.S. Supreme Court is equally rare and significant. In a notable legal triumph, Great Lakes Insurance SE achieved a unanimous 9-0 victory in the Supreme Court on February 21, 2024. This victory follows a protracted legal battle that began in the District Court of Pennsylvania, advanced to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and culminated in the Supreme Court’s decisive ruling. Background of the Case: Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Company The heart of the dispute was the insurance contract’s clause selecting New York law to govern any future legal conflicts. Although the financial implications of this case were relatively minor compared to the broader marine insurance industry, the insurer’s determination to uphold a crucial maritime legal principle has significant long-term implications for marine insurance. Faced with the insured’s counterclaims—including allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, insurance bad faith, and violations of Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices Law—the insurer was confronted with serious risks. Such claims could lead to the shifting of attorney’s fees, treble damages, and more, which might normally encourage insurers to settle rather than risk pursuing justice. However, Great Lakes Insurance, supported by The Goldman Maritime Law Group, opted to challenge the Third Circuit’s decision and seek clarity from the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Ruling: A Landmark Decision In a landmark ruling, Justice Brett Kavanaugh affirmed that choice of law provisions in maritime contracts should be upheld by default. This ruling is a major victory for establishing a consistent federal standard in maritime law and avoiding a patchwork of state laws that could complicate marine insurance disputes. The Supreme Court’s decision overturned the Third Circuit’s earlier judgment, which had questioned whether Pennsylvania’s public policy concerns might override the insurance contract’s choice of New York law. By upholding the New York choice of law clause, the Supreme Court eliminated the extra-contractual bad faith claims under Pennsylvania law, thereby ensuring that the dispute could be resolved based on the merits of the insurance claim itself. Significance of the Supreme Court’s Decision This ruling represents a significant advancement in maritime law, affirming that choice of law clauses in maritime contracts are generally enforceable. The decision establishes a clear, uniform legal framework for resolving maritime contract disputes, which will streamline the process and ensure fair adjudication of future insurance claims. Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion was particularly notable for its criticism of the 1955 Wilburn Boat v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance decision, which had previously influenced maritime insurance law. Thomas argued that Wilburn Boat was incorrectly decided and stressed that a uniform and enforceable set of rules is essential for the development of maritime law. Impact on the Marine Insurance Industry The Supreme Court’s decision sets a “bright-line” rule affirming that choice of law clauses are valid unless there is a strong argument against the selected jurisdiction. By endorsing New York’s insurance laws as a reasonable choice, the ruling supports a more consistent and predictable legal environment for marine insurers. This decision represents a major step forward in maritime law, helping insurers better assess risks, determine premiums, and ensure fair and efficient resolution of maritime insurance disputes.

Parametric insurance is reshaping commercial property coverage