Search
Close this search box.

Nuanced approach critical for construction insurance

pexels-pixabay-534220

Nuanced approach critical for construction insurance

Building contractors face the highest average annual cost for general liability coverage due to the inherently riskier nature of their endeavors.

“Insurers have their own underwriting protocols and risk appetites, and residential construction — particularly new condo developments and housing subdivisions — is a risk that some insurers do not want to assume,” Robert Bambino, of Gramercy Risk Management.

Building contractors and construction firms face the highest average annual costs for general liability coverage, according to AdvisorSmith Solutions, Inc., which noted even small construction businesses pay average premiums of $1,076 annually.

In comparison, the average cost for commercial general liability in the U.S. is $597 a year, or about $50 a month for small businesses, AdvisorSmith reported.

While construction companies have potentially more complex underlying exposures to cover than typical businesses, Matthew Fishlinger, COO of Gramercy Risk Management, told PropertyCasualty360.com carriers paint the construction market with too broad a brush, resulting in continuingly growing rates.

Leveraging a fragmented view

“Viewing construction risk in a monolithic way ignores the wide variety of the type of work being performed and what projects that work is being performed on,” Fishlinger said. ”It is critical to have a nuanced understanding of each contractor subset and the exposures that ultimately drive their loss activity. Targeted underwriting, claims and risk management strategies can then be applied to effectively manage the risk.”

Gramercy’s New York contractors program is a reflection of this approach, primarily targeting electricians, plumbers, HVAC contractors and small to midsized general contractors focused on maintenance and renovations rather than new construction.

“We identify these subsets as being inherently more profitable due to the type of work they perform,” he said. “Applying our risk management, risk transfer and claims management services to further mitigate the risk allows us to provide stable year-over-year pricing for our clients.”

While the construction insurance market is tightening, the building trades are blooming as the Housing Construction Index hit 141.2 in December, the highest level on record, according to LegalShield’s Economic Stress Index. In January, the market cooled some, hitting 138 on the index. However, this is still the third-highest level on record and above pre-pandemic levels.

Residential will outpace commercial building in 2021

Moving into 2021, residential construction is anticipated to outpace commercial projects, according to Robert Bambino, executive vice president of risk management at Gramercy. He explained several factors are driving this, including more millennials seeking private homeownership, people looking for bigger living spaces, remote work, low-interest rates and people fleeing cities to avoid congestion during the pandemic.

However, construction firms working in the residential space might not find as many options with traditional insurance markets, forcing them to consider non-admitted excess & surplus line policies and potentially face policy exclusions for residential work. The hard market makes this more likely, Bambino added.

These exclusions run the gambit from complete to partial exclusions for construction such as co-ops, housing developments and multi-family dwellings.

“Insurers have their own underwriting protocols and risk appetites, and residential construction — particularly new condo developments and housing subdivisions — is a risk that some insurers do not want to assume,” Bambino told PC360.

For New York builders, the possibility of facing exclusions grows exponentially because of sections 240 and 241 of the state’s labor laws, which deal with height-related tasks, according to Fishlinger.

“New York is the only state in the country that applies strict liability for height-related claims,” he said. For example, if a subcontractor’s employee has an accident, New York law says they cannot sue their employer. Instead, the incident must go through worker’s compensation. However, for certain height-related accidents, the subcontractor might have recourse back up to the general contractor, who would be held strictly liable for the incident.

“Sections 240 and 241 of New York’s labor law have been a contributing factor in the insurance industry’s struggles to manage this state’s construction risk properly,” he said, again stressing that a disciplined approach to risk management, and risk transfer more broadly, is so vital.

“Construction risk as a whole encompasses a wide range of exposures, from simple electrical work in a private residence to painting a couple of hundred feet up on the Brooklyn Bridge,” Fishlinger said, pointing out the inherent risks are wildly different from job to job.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts

Insurance-technology

Specific Technologies Driving Insurtech Investment in 2024

Understanding the Funding Decline The decrease in funding does not necessarily spell trouble for the insurance sector but instead highlights a strategic shift, the report suggests. “The insurance industry, like many sectors, is focusing on the most promising ventures with substantial insurance potential,” the report explains. “Insurers are directing their investments toward key areas and current trends such as embedded insurance, employee benefits, and cyber risk management. This strategic investment approach signals a forward-looking mindset within the industry.” Three Key Insurtech Trends for 2024 The report identifies three major trends shaping insurtech investments in 2024: Public Insurtech Companies: Financial and Growth Strategies The report also notes that public insurtech companies are prioritizing revenue growth as their main goal. These firms are restructuring their financial strategies to boost cash flow and capitalize on rising revenue streams. Their growth prospects are supported by expanding asset portfolios and strong market demand. “Public insurtech companies are focusing on revenue growth and optimizing their financial frameworks to increase cash flow,” the report states. “The growth potential for these companies is driven by increasing revenue opportunities, broadening asset bases, and a robust market for their services.” In summary, while global insurtech funding saw a decline in 2023, the industry’s focus on GenAI, digital process management, and connected insurance technologies is setting the stage for a dynamic and forward-looking 2024.

Read More
Business

Insurer Secures Unanimous Supreme Court Victory in New York Choice of Law Dispute

In the world of sports, a clean sweep, a shutout, or a perfect game is the ultimate achievement. In the legal arena, a unanimous decision from the U.S. Supreme Court is equally rare and significant. In a notable legal triumph, Great Lakes Insurance SE achieved a unanimous 9-0 victory in the Supreme Court on February 21, 2024. This victory follows a protracted legal battle that began in the District Court of Pennsylvania, advanced to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and culminated in the Supreme Court’s decisive ruling. Background of the Case: Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Company The heart of the dispute was the insurance contract’s clause selecting New York law to govern any future legal conflicts. Although the financial implications of this case were relatively minor compared to the broader marine insurance industry, the insurer’s determination to uphold a crucial maritime legal principle has significant long-term implications for marine insurance. Faced with the insured’s counterclaims—including allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, insurance bad faith, and violations of Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices Law—the insurer was confronted with serious risks. Such claims could lead to the shifting of attorney’s fees, treble damages, and more, which might normally encourage insurers to settle rather than risk pursuing justice. However, Great Lakes Insurance, supported by The Goldman Maritime Law Group, opted to challenge the Third Circuit’s decision and seek clarity from the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Ruling: A Landmark Decision In a landmark ruling, Justice Brett Kavanaugh affirmed that choice of law provisions in maritime contracts should be upheld by default. This ruling is a major victory for establishing a consistent federal standard in maritime law and avoiding a patchwork of state laws that could complicate marine insurance disputes. The Supreme Court’s decision overturned the Third Circuit’s earlier judgment, which had questioned whether Pennsylvania’s public policy concerns might override the insurance contract’s choice of New York law. By upholding the New York choice of law clause, the Supreme Court eliminated the extra-contractual bad faith claims under Pennsylvania law, thereby ensuring that the dispute could be resolved based on the merits of the insurance claim itself. Significance of the Supreme Court’s Decision This ruling represents a significant advancement in maritime law, affirming that choice of law clauses in maritime contracts are generally enforceable. The decision establishes a clear, uniform legal framework for resolving maritime contract disputes, which will streamline the process and ensure fair adjudication of future insurance claims. Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion was particularly notable for its criticism of the 1955 Wilburn Boat v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance decision, which had previously influenced maritime insurance law. Thomas argued that Wilburn Boat was incorrectly decided and stressed that a uniform and enforceable set of rules is essential for the development of maritime law. Impact on the Marine Insurance Industry The Supreme Court’s decision sets a “bright-line” rule affirming that choice of law clauses are valid unless there is a strong argument against the selected jurisdiction. By endorsing New York’s insurance laws as a reasonable choice, the ruling supports a more consistent and predictable legal environment for marine insurers. This decision represents a major step forward in maritime law, helping insurers better assess risks, determine premiums, and ensure fair and efficient resolution of maritime insurance disputes.

Read More
Try your instant quote