Close this search box.

Management and Professional Liability for Real Estate Companies


Management and Professional Liability for Real Estate Companies

Real estate companies: here’s the need-to-know about management and professional liability

The real estate industry truly knows the meaning of highs and lows. When the market is strong, deals are abundant, revenue growth is prolific and competition is fierce. When the market is weak (or worse, recessed), investors are both timid and scarce, receivables are uncertain…and growth can stagnate.

But regardless of the market direction, companies in the real estate sector face the constant threat of legal liability. The market direction dictates the nature of the threats that arise.

For example, when conditions are good, competition brings with it tortious interference allegations. More work can also mean a higher chance of errors or omissions in your work.

On the flip side, when conditions are bad, financially strained investors are more likely to file lawsuits. Tenants unable to meet their obligations can lead to torpedoed deals or risky eviction proceedings.

Our intent here is to explore a few of the key risks faced by real estate companies. We’ll also look at the insurance products that can mitigate those risks and allow companies to focus on their core business and long-term goals.

Let’s take a look at three broadly defined classes of business in the real estate industry:

  • Property managers – you are the boots on the ground at a completed property. You oversee everything from rent to staffing to reporting to maintenance. 
  • Real estate developers – you oversee the process from planning to construction to sale. You’re in charge of the design and execution and your business is high risk, high reward.
  • Property owners and investment vehicles – the buck stops with you. You oversee the financing, contracts and legal structure. Acquisitions/sales, reports to investors and partners and the supervision of your property manager are among the many jobs that land on your desk.

For businesses such as these, insurance is probably already on the radar. They may have explored insurance policies mandated by state law or contract, such as workers’ compensation and general liability.

While these are absolutely necessary coverages by themselves, they can leave glaring holes in a company’s risk management program. Workers’ Comp and GL provide fundamental protections from risks such as an employee injured on the job site, damage to third-party property, or a slip-and-fall at the office.

However, they do little to address the many risks that exist outside of simple liability, from bodily injury or property damage. Like the following scenarios:

  • Structural defects in an apartment complex lead to tenants suing a developer for failing to properly supervise the construction process
  • Personally identifiable information of tenants is stolen, misused, or leaked
  • A limited partner files a suit against the general partner for overcharging fees
  • An allegation rises regarding a misrepresentation of the strength of the fund or the value of an investment

These scenarios share two common facts:

  1. They’re all real-life scenarios that have happened in the past and will happen in the future.
  2. They are all insurable risks.

Let’s look at three common insurance policies in the real estate industry and review why they are so important for managing risk and ensuring the survival of your business.

Types of insurance policies

Directors & officers insurance

High Level: This policy covers executives and the company if they are named in a lawsuit or regulatory action. Claims include allegations of breach of fiduciary duty from investors, investigations from regulatory bodies such as the SEC, unfair trade practice suits from competitors and claims of misrepresentation or fraud (as long as it is unfounded) from vendors.

These policies are frequently offered with additional coverages such as employment practices liability and fiduciary liability insurance. Employment practices liability insurance covers suits from employees (and sometimes third-parties) alleging harassment, discrimination, wrongful termination and other employment disputes.  Fiduciary liability insurance protects the company from its exposure as the sponsor of an employee benefit plan.

Professional liability insurance

High Level: this policy covers the company in the event of lawsuits that allege it was negligent in its duties as part of an ongoing professional relationships. These can be suits from clients alleging breach of contract, suits from tenants claiming discrimination or suits from limited partners who feel there were errors made during a fund’s distribution process.

For property owners and investment vehicles, the best practice is to purchase a directors & officers policy that blends in coverage for professional liability claims. The right policies are specifically designed to account for the unique aspects of these businesses, such as the possibility of an investor claiming an error or omission in the provision of their investment management service.

They also include features that allow for automatic coverage of the many limited partnerships and LLC’s created during any given year (something that may not be available in an off-the-shelf D&O policy).

Cyber liability insurance

High Level: This policy protects the company from litigation and other expenses associated with a cyber attack or data breach.

Any company that collects individuals’ personally identifiable information (PII) has a responsibility to protect that info. PII includes obvious high-risk data such as social security numbers and credit card, but it doesn’t end there. Names, phone numbers, email addresses — even IP addresses — can all be considered PII.

If an unauthorized party gets access to this information via a company’s systems, that company may have to bear the cost of civil suits and regulatory fines and penalties.

It’s important to remember that a company’s liability begins much earlier than the moment a criminal steals someone’s identity. An event as simple as a the loss of a thumb drive has been enough for companies to be on the hook for millions in legal costs and fines.

A cyber liability policy is designed to cover these costs. This includes coverage for suits from affected individuals and costs associated with a regulatory investigation.

Some policies also include “first party” coverages which include the costs of:

  • notifying your customers and providing credit monitoring for them
  • business interruption after a cyber-attack locks up your systems
  • forensic investigation into the source of the breach

Possible claim scenarios

Let’s look at some practical examples:

Example 1: A prospective tenant of a unit in an apartment building is working with a property manager to secure a lease. After a lengthy back-and-forth regarding terms, prior-landlord references, and financial records, the applicant is outraged upon discovering that the unit was given to another individual who was ready and willing to provide the requested information.

The outraged applicant alleges she was told by the manager that the unit was basically hers and that they just had to “dot the i’s”. The applicant files suit against the property manager and building owner alleging discrimination based on race and gender, failure to process the lease in a timely manner, bad-faith negotiating, and mental anguish.

Which policy could pay for this: Professional Liability

Example 2: A real estate investment trust acquires a shopping center anchored by a big-box retail store. The REIT reports to investors that it anticipates strong returns based on low tenant turnover, a great location and high foot-traffic.

Six months after the acquisition, the big-box tenant announces falling earnings and decides to reshape their geographic footprint. This tenant breaks its lease and shuts down the anchor location. Economic conditions make finding a new anchor tenant more difficult than initially thought. With that, the once promising shopping center begins what will become steady decline to unprofitability.

As the REIT’s shareholders watch their investment erode, they sue the CEO, CFO, CIO and board of directors for misrepresentations, breach of fiduciary duty and negligence.

Which policy could pay for this: Directors & Officers

Example 3: A real estate private-equity fund has a diverse portfolio which necessitates a complex structure of limited partnerships, LLC’s, and SPV’s.

As the fund winds down, a group of investors sue the fund and its partners, alleging that they overcharged management and performance fees and gave special treatment to one of the larger limited partners (who also happened to have various sidecar investments with the GP).

Which policies could pay for this: Directors & Officers and Professional Liability

Example 4: A developer is given the job of overseeing the construction of a cutting-edge, “green” building.

The developer’s proposal is significantly more expensive than the investors’ target but the developer convinces the investors that reduced energy costs and higher rent will increase their ROI in the long run.

As the project is underway, complications in reconciling the aesthetic with various “green” features leads to a redesign. This adds to the construction costs of the project and the time to completion since new permits are now needed.

The investors sue the developer for negligence in the design process and failure to properly supervise the construction company.

Which policy could pay for this: Professional Liability

Example 5: The employee of a property manager brings his laptop home with him after a late night at the office. When he walks out the next morning, the passenger window of his car is shattered and the bag containing his laptop has been stolen.

Since the laptop’s hard drive contained tenants’ names, addresses, phone numbers and email addresses, the manager has a problem on his or her hands. Concern snowballs as it’s discovered that the employee can’t remember whether or not he is auto-logged in to the online rent receivables platform.

Now there is a chance that the thief has access to banking information as well. The manager reports the theft to police and, in order to comply with state data privacy laws, takes on the cost of formally notifying all tenants of the potential theft of personally identifiable information.

Tenants file suit against the property manager and building owners alleging a failure to properly secure sensitive data. The court orders compensatory damages as well as the provision of ongoing credit monitoring services for the tenants and a 24-hour help line for potentially affected individuals. The state then imposes fines and penalties for failure to comply with the relevant data privacy statutes.

Which policy could pay for this: Cyber Liability (with coverage for first-party expenses)

Summing it up

Every business has to deal with the double-edged sword of success: as your company grows, so too does your legal liability. This is no less true with real estate companies. With every new tenant, project and investment, your increased potential for profit is matched by your increased potential for litigation.

One thing that is crucial to remember when considering these types of policies. It doesn’t take much for someone to file a lawsuit against you or your company. Even borderline frivolous claims will cost you in the form of both time and legal costs. If there is some perceivable merit to the allegations, your costs will skyrocket.

Properly designing your risk management practices around the unique exposures faced by your business is crucial to creating scalable growth. While it is understandably tempting to limit your insurance costs to whatever policies are required by statutes or contracts, this mentality could be considered dangerously shortsighted.

The types of claims described above are not just possible, they’re common. The right insurance policy will absorb the costs of lawyers’ bills, investigation costs, judgements/settlements and the various expenses associated with a data breach. This will allow you to put more focus on running your business and less on a tumbling bottom line.  

For this reason, these policies should be viewed as an investment (rather than an expense) in the future of your company.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts


Specific Technologies Driving Insurtech Investment in 2024

Understanding the Funding Decline The decrease in funding does not necessarily spell trouble for the insurance sector but instead highlights a strategic shift, the report suggests. “The insurance industry, like many sectors, is focusing on the most promising ventures with substantial insurance potential,” the report explains. “Insurers are directing their investments toward key areas and current trends such as embedded insurance, employee benefits, and cyber risk management. This strategic investment approach signals a forward-looking mindset within the industry.” Three Key Insurtech Trends for 2024 The report identifies three major trends shaping insurtech investments in 2024: Public Insurtech Companies: Financial and Growth Strategies The report also notes that public insurtech companies are prioritizing revenue growth as their main goal. These firms are restructuring their financial strategies to boost cash flow and capitalize on rising revenue streams. Their growth prospects are supported by expanding asset portfolios and strong market demand. “Public insurtech companies are focusing on revenue growth and optimizing their financial frameworks to increase cash flow,” the report states. “The growth potential for these companies is driven by increasing revenue opportunities, broadening asset bases, and a robust market for their services.” In summary, while global insurtech funding saw a decline in 2023, the industry’s focus on GenAI, digital process management, and connected insurance technologies is setting the stage for a dynamic and forward-looking 2024.

Read More

Insurer Secures Unanimous Supreme Court Victory in New York Choice of Law Dispute

In the world of sports, a clean sweep, a shutout, or a perfect game is the ultimate achievement. In the legal arena, a unanimous decision from the U.S. Supreme Court is equally rare and significant. In a notable legal triumph, Great Lakes Insurance SE achieved a unanimous 9-0 victory in the Supreme Court on February 21, 2024. This victory follows a protracted legal battle that began in the District Court of Pennsylvania, advanced to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and culminated in the Supreme Court’s decisive ruling. Background of the Case: Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Company The heart of the dispute was the insurance contract’s clause selecting New York law to govern any future legal conflicts. Although the financial implications of this case were relatively minor compared to the broader marine insurance industry, the insurer’s determination to uphold a crucial maritime legal principle has significant long-term implications for marine insurance. Faced with the insured’s counterclaims—including allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, insurance bad faith, and violations of Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices Law—the insurer was confronted with serious risks. Such claims could lead to the shifting of attorney’s fees, treble damages, and more, which might normally encourage insurers to settle rather than risk pursuing justice. However, Great Lakes Insurance, supported by The Goldman Maritime Law Group, opted to challenge the Third Circuit’s decision and seek clarity from the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Ruling: A Landmark Decision In a landmark ruling, Justice Brett Kavanaugh affirmed that choice of law provisions in maritime contracts should be upheld by default. This ruling is a major victory for establishing a consistent federal standard in maritime law and avoiding a patchwork of state laws that could complicate marine insurance disputes. The Supreme Court’s decision overturned the Third Circuit’s earlier judgment, which had questioned whether Pennsylvania’s public policy concerns might override the insurance contract’s choice of New York law. By upholding the New York choice of law clause, the Supreme Court eliminated the extra-contractual bad faith claims under Pennsylvania law, thereby ensuring that the dispute could be resolved based on the merits of the insurance claim itself. Significance of the Supreme Court’s Decision This ruling represents a significant advancement in maritime law, affirming that choice of law clauses in maritime contracts are generally enforceable. The decision establishes a clear, uniform legal framework for resolving maritime contract disputes, which will streamline the process and ensure fair adjudication of future insurance claims. Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion was particularly notable for its criticism of the 1955 Wilburn Boat v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance decision, which had previously influenced maritime insurance law. Thomas argued that Wilburn Boat was incorrectly decided and stressed that a uniform and enforceable set of rules is essential for the development of maritime law. Impact on the Marine Insurance Industry The Supreme Court’s decision sets a “bright-line” rule affirming that choice of law clauses are valid unless there is a strong argument against the selected jurisdiction. By endorsing New York’s insurance laws as a reasonable choice, the ruling supports a more consistent and predictable legal environment for marine insurers. This decision represents a major step forward in maritime law, helping insurers better assess risks, determine premiums, and ensure fair and efficient resolution of maritime insurance disputes.

Read More
Try your instant quote