Insurance considerations for backyard pandemic weddings

Insurance agents might consider proposing additional coverage options or special event riders to better protect their clients.

Although standard home insurance policies include some protection for event or guest mishaps that happen on the premises, that coverage can be severely limited and is not designed to cover the full exposure of an event like a wedding.

This year, 95% of engaged couples with spring weddings decided to postpone or reschedule their nuptials, according to The Knot. As the new coronavirus continues to spread, some couples have opted for intimate backyard weddings that take place at their home or another residence.

Pandemic restrictions dictate social gatherings must be small, but even the tiniest of weddings are likely to see as many or more event mishaps as a large, venue-hosted wedding. What’s more, any host of such an event must worry about whether their insurance will cover the house and its guests if something goes wrong.

Unlike professional event venues that carry hundreds of thousands of dollars in liability coverage — or event planners who often sell policies that cover damage or cancellation — the host of a backyard wedding now retains all the potential risks.

Time to consult an insurance agent

Some clients may be rightfully nervous about managing the unexpected during a backyard wedding. Insurance agents can help. (Shutterstock)

When reviewing client and prospect insurance needs, agents should inquire about any events, weddings or parties planned on their property and discuss what their home insurance policy may or may not cover.

Couples and their families may be surprised by the level of protection (or lack thereof) they have with their existing home insurance policy. Agents might consider proposing additional coverage options to help protect clients from backyard nuptial calamities as well as special event riders and standalone policies to boost their client’s existing liability insurance and protection from cancellations.

To help clients plan for a backyard pandemic wedding, agents should review which disasters could happen and talk about the coverage options they have or might need to add to their existing home insurance policy to ensure they’re protected.

What follows are just some of the risks associated with backyard weddings.

Day-of disasters

Traditional home insurance covers the generally unfortunate incidents that hosts and newlyweds could face during a wedding. For example, if a guest trips and breaks their leg on the makeshift dance floor, the homeowners’ personal liability coverage will pay for legal and medical bills.

If the host does not have the coverage and fails to show what courts call “reasonable care,” which involves a degree of caution and concern for their own safety as well as the safety of those in their home, the homeowner could be held liable for the injury.

Home insurance also covers the loss of wedding gifts, should the unexpected happen such as a guest stealing the homeowner’s presents or sprinklers turning on and damaging the gifts beyond repair.

Cooking catastrophes

To reduce on-site headcount and save money, wedding hosts might decide to prepare and serve food out of their own kitchen. While this can help to reduce the potential of COVID 19-transmission and maintain a wedding budget, it also poses additional risks.

According to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), cooking is the leading cause of home structure fires. While damage caused by a fire can be covered by home insurance, fires caused by a caterer or contractor are that vendor’s responsibility. (In either case, the newlyweds’ dream of a fairy-tale wedding will go up in smoke.)

Ahead of a backyard wedding and during any review of client insurance coverage, agents might recommend additional liability coverage to protect clients from financial loss through add-on riders, or even secondary policies to provide protection beyond existing insurance limits, such as umbrella insurance, which can provide supplemental coverage that increases their liability limits.

Liquor liability

Weddings usually involve liquor consumption. When alcohol is involved, there is a greater chance for accidents and other misfortunes.

While traditional wedding venues typically have their own liquor liability coverage, it isn’t a protection that many homeowners have in their home insurance policy. However, should a backyard wedding guest drink too much, drive and get in a car accident, the event hosts could be held liable for injuries to third parties and car passengers as well as responsible for any damages resulting from the accident, not to mention subsequent claims and lawsuits. While some coverage is provided by a standard home insurance policy, that coverage can be severely limited and is not designed to cover the full exposure of an event like a wedding.

If alcohol is going to be served at any home wedding, insurance agents should suggest their clients obtain an add-on liquor liability policy to avoid any drunken mishaps for which the homeowner could be found liable.

Some clients may be rightfully nervous about managing the unexpected during a backyard wedding. Insurance agents can help put these clients at ease by playing out any and all situations that could happen during the big day and then discuss what can and cannot be covered by their current policy. An impending wedding is also a great opportunity to suggest adding umbrella insurance to a client’s portfolio. The best carriers make it fast and easy to add umbrella insurance to an existing insurance policy. The drop-down protection can help with future potential risks, like a new boat or pool, or even a second backyard wedding.

Specific Technologies Driving Insurtech Investment in 2024

Understanding the Funding Decline The decrease in funding does not necessarily spell trouble for the insurance sector but instead highlights a strategic shift, the report suggests. “The insurance industry, like many sectors, is focusing on the most promising ventures with substantial insurance potential,” the report explains. “Insurers are directing their investments toward key areas and current trends such as embedded insurance, employee benefits, and cyber risk management. This strategic investment approach signals a forward-looking mindset within the industry.” Three Key Insurtech Trends for 2024 The report identifies three major trends shaping insurtech investments in 2024: Public Insurtech Companies: Financial and Growth Strategies The report also notes that public insurtech companies are prioritizing revenue growth as their main goal. These firms are restructuring their financial strategies to boost cash flow and capitalize on rising revenue streams. Their growth prospects are supported by expanding asset portfolios and strong market demand. “Public insurtech companies are focusing on revenue growth and optimizing their financial frameworks to increase cash flow,” the report states. “The growth potential for these companies is driven by increasing revenue opportunities, broadening asset bases, and a robust market for their services.” In summary, while global insurtech funding saw a decline in 2023, the industry’s focus on GenAI, digital process management, and connected insurance technologies is setting the stage for a dynamic and forward-looking 2024.

Business

Insurer Secures Unanimous Supreme Court Victory in New York Choice of Law Dispute

In the world of sports, a clean sweep, a shutout, or a perfect game is the ultimate achievement. In the legal arena, a unanimous decision from the U.S. Supreme Court is equally rare and significant. In a notable legal triumph, Great Lakes Insurance SE achieved a unanimous 9-0 victory in the Supreme Court on February 21, 2024. This victory follows a protracted legal battle that began in the District Court of Pennsylvania, advanced to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and culminated in the Supreme Court’s decisive ruling. Background of the Case: Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Company The heart of the dispute was the insurance contract’s clause selecting New York law to govern any future legal conflicts. Although the financial implications of this case were relatively minor compared to the broader marine insurance industry, the insurer’s determination to uphold a crucial maritime legal principle has significant long-term implications for marine insurance. Faced with the insured’s counterclaims—including allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, insurance bad faith, and violations of Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices Law—the insurer was confronted with serious risks. Such claims could lead to the shifting of attorney’s fees, treble damages, and more, which might normally encourage insurers to settle rather than risk pursuing justice. However, Great Lakes Insurance, supported by The Goldman Maritime Law Group, opted to challenge the Third Circuit’s decision and seek clarity from the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Ruling: A Landmark Decision In a landmark ruling, Justice Brett Kavanaugh affirmed that choice of law provisions in maritime contracts should be upheld by default. This ruling is a major victory for establishing a consistent federal standard in maritime law and avoiding a patchwork of state laws that could complicate marine insurance disputes. The Supreme Court’s decision overturned the Third Circuit’s earlier judgment, which had questioned whether Pennsylvania’s public policy concerns might override the insurance contract’s choice of New York law. By upholding the New York choice of law clause, the Supreme Court eliminated the extra-contractual bad faith claims under Pennsylvania law, thereby ensuring that the dispute could be resolved based on the merits of the insurance claim itself. Significance of the Supreme Court’s Decision This ruling represents a significant advancement in maritime law, affirming that choice of law clauses in maritime contracts are generally enforceable. The decision establishes a clear, uniform legal framework for resolving maritime contract disputes, which will streamline the process and ensure fair adjudication of future insurance claims. Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion was particularly notable for its criticism of the 1955 Wilburn Boat v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance decision, which had previously influenced maritime insurance law. Thomas argued that Wilburn Boat was incorrectly decided and stressed that a uniform and enforceable set of rules is essential for the development of maritime law. Impact on the Marine Insurance Industry The Supreme Court’s decision sets a “bright-line” rule affirming that choice of law clauses are valid unless there is a strong argument against the selected jurisdiction. By endorsing New York’s insurance laws as a reasonable choice, the ruling supports a more consistent and predictable legal environment for marine insurers. This decision represents a major step forward in maritime law, helping insurers better assess risks, determine premiums, and ensure fair and efficient resolution of maritime insurance disputes.

Insurance considerations for backyard pandemic weddings