Search
Close this search box.

Harness inclusion, innovation to solve insurance’s toughest problems

Innovation_Adobe-Stock

Harness inclusion, innovation to solve insurance’s toughest problems

Innovation will be necessary to combat the long-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the insurance industry.

“Never let a good crisis go to waste.”

Those words, reportedly spoken nearly 80 years ago by former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, ring so very true in 2020. As society faces numerous crises — from racial inequality and social injustice to climate change to a global pandemic — our industry finds itself uniquely positioned.

There is no better institution to help build, create and restore wealth and legacy than the insurance industry. That’s why we must step up and harness innovation now to reduce the risk related to these crises now and in the future.

This type of innovation isn’t about inventing the next smartphone. Instead, it’s about changing the status quo, pain point by pain point, and responding in new, more effective ways. We can only accomplish this by embracing an environment of inclusion and diversity, one where all voices will be heard.

As we see it, insurance has a unique and compelling opportunity to be on the forefront of social justice. We can start by innovating to close the wealth gap that exists across all ethnicities. To overcome these barriers, we must create affordable insurance products that provide consistent coverage. It’s a topic sure to be discussed at the upcoming Insurance Industry Charitable Foundation’s (IICF) Inclusion in Insurance Forum. But it’s one that should also extend to every boardroom in America. It’s not just the right thing to do. It makes good business sense. By providing policies in a cost-effective distribution channel with state-of-the-art innovation, our industry will drive volumes of net new policies, which will, in turn, create fresh revenue.

See also: Insurance Speak: An inside look at the IICF.

Innovation will also be necessary to combat the long-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on our industry. Pre-COVID-19, the small-market business was a huge growth area for many carriers. Now, some experts predict almost 60% of small businesses may not survive the pandemic. This will impact insurers’ bottom lines dramatically.

Growing and surviving after COVID-19 comes down to this question: How can we protect people and businesses better during the type of global public health crisis some of us once considered unprotectable?

We used to think pricing cybersecurity policies was difficult. So how will we price a pandemic? The answer, again, is by harnessing innovation to create products at consumable price points that will adequately protect small businesses up and down Main Street.

Climate change may present just as great a risk. This year we’ve already seen record-setting Pacific wildfire and Atlantic hurricane seasons, as well as outbreaks of violent tornadoes and derechos in the heartland and the Northeast. The industry must increase our response to evolving climate change as well as mitigating climate change and promoting resiliency.

The challenges of climate change bring to light the disparate and inconsistent approach to disaster-related coverage throughout the U.S. Right now, in a New England flood zone, you can’t close on the sale of a home without proof of flood insurance. But you can do so in areas of the coastal southeast. In California, you can close a home that’s located near a fault line without EQ coverage. While we must normalize these inconsistencies, we also must revamp how we model risk exposure. The current approach has created unaffordable premiums and overly complicated policies, leading people and businesses to go uninsured. Right now, every $1 of uninsured loss costs a U.S. taxpayer $7.

Innovation is the only way for our industry to help close this alarming protection gap.

So, how do we start innovating in ways that allow us to transform the future of work, drive growth and build profitability? We must harness the thinking power, creativity, resources and talent of every single employee at all levels of our organizations. To do so, we need to raise our industry’s levels of awareness, access and accountability.

When it comes to awareness, we can do a better job of recruiting employees, and then we must retain, mentor and sponsor them in meaningful ways. When we recruit employees, we need to share the noble purpose of this industry as well as the great variety of focus areas they can choose from.

But awareness alone isn’t enough. New employees won’t be attracted to us—or they won’t stay with us — if we don’t also offer them access to a clear career path that goes beyond the mid-level to the senior level.

For our industry to innovate, our leaders also must remain accountable to our employees, clients and policyholders. Engage them in conversation. Share those innovative solutions and ideas with your stakeholders, clients, board members — all people who have a vested interest in your organization’s success. When you listen, you’ll be amazed at what you actually hear.

Almost every great crisis in history has been followed by light. By raising awareness, access and accountability, everyone in our industry can create that light through innovation and inclusion. We must lean in, step up, and raise our voices so we can continue our industry’s noble purpose of keeping people safe and in times of crisis, should be providing the means to rebuild.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts

Insurance-technology

Specific Technologies Driving Insurtech Investment in 2024

Understanding the Funding Decline The decrease in funding does not necessarily spell trouble for the insurance sector but instead highlights a strategic shift, the report suggests. “The insurance industry, like many sectors, is focusing on the most promising ventures with substantial insurance potential,” the report explains. “Insurers are directing their investments toward key areas and current trends such as embedded insurance, employee benefits, and cyber risk management. This strategic investment approach signals a forward-looking mindset within the industry.” Three Key Insurtech Trends for 2024 The report identifies three major trends shaping insurtech investments in 2024: Public Insurtech Companies: Financial and Growth Strategies The report also notes that public insurtech companies are prioritizing revenue growth as their main goal. These firms are restructuring their financial strategies to boost cash flow and capitalize on rising revenue streams. Their growth prospects are supported by expanding asset portfolios and strong market demand. “Public insurtech companies are focusing on revenue growth and optimizing their financial frameworks to increase cash flow,” the report states. “The growth potential for these companies is driven by increasing revenue opportunities, broadening asset bases, and a robust market for their services.” In summary, while global insurtech funding saw a decline in 2023, the industry’s focus on GenAI, digital process management, and connected insurance technologies is setting the stage for a dynamic and forward-looking 2024.

Read More
Business

Insurer Secures Unanimous Supreme Court Victory in New York Choice of Law Dispute

In the world of sports, a clean sweep, a shutout, or a perfect game is the ultimate achievement. In the legal arena, a unanimous decision from the U.S. Supreme Court is equally rare and significant. In a notable legal triumph, Great Lakes Insurance SE achieved a unanimous 9-0 victory in the Supreme Court on February 21, 2024. This victory follows a protracted legal battle that began in the District Court of Pennsylvania, advanced to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and culminated in the Supreme Court’s decisive ruling. Background of the Case: Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Company The heart of the dispute was the insurance contract’s clause selecting New York law to govern any future legal conflicts. Although the financial implications of this case were relatively minor compared to the broader marine insurance industry, the insurer’s determination to uphold a crucial maritime legal principle has significant long-term implications for marine insurance. Faced with the insured’s counterclaims—including allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, insurance bad faith, and violations of Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices Law—the insurer was confronted with serious risks. Such claims could lead to the shifting of attorney’s fees, treble damages, and more, which might normally encourage insurers to settle rather than risk pursuing justice. However, Great Lakes Insurance, supported by The Goldman Maritime Law Group, opted to challenge the Third Circuit’s decision and seek clarity from the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Ruling: A Landmark Decision In a landmark ruling, Justice Brett Kavanaugh affirmed that choice of law provisions in maritime contracts should be upheld by default. This ruling is a major victory for establishing a consistent federal standard in maritime law and avoiding a patchwork of state laws that could complicate marine insurance disputes. The Supreme Court’s decision overturned the Third Circuit’s earlier judgment, which had questioned whether Pennsylvania’s public policy concerns might override the insurance contract’s choice of New York law. By upholding the New York choice of law clause, the Supreme Court eliminated the extra-contractual bad faith claims under Pennsylvania law, thereby ensuring that the dispute could be resolved based on the merits of the insurance claim itself. Significance of the Supreme Court’s Decision This ruling represents a significant advancement in maritime law, affirming that choice of law clauses in maritime contracts are generally enforceable. The decision establishes a clear, uniform legal framework for resolving maritime contract disputes, which will streamline the process and ensure fair adjudication of future insurance claims. Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion was particularly notable for its criticism of the 1955 Wilburn Boat v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance decision, which had previously influenced maritime insurance law. Thomas argued that Wilburn Boat was incorrectly decided and stressed that a uniform and enforceable set of rules is essential for the development of maritime law. Impact on the Marine Insurance Industry The Supreme Court’s decision sets a “bright-line” rule affirming that choice of law clauses are valid unless there is a strong argument against the selected jurisdiction. By endorsing New York’s insurance laws as a reasonable choice, the ruling supports a more consistent and predictable legal environment for marine insurers. This decision represents a major step forward in maritime law, helping insurers better assess risks, determine premiums, and ensure fair and efficient resolution of maritime insurance disputes.

Read More
Try your instant quote