Search
Close this search box.

We Insure Your Vision for a Brighter Tomorrow

Louisiana-6

We Insure Your Vision for a Brighter Tomorrow

Climbing gyms come into existence for a variety of reasons. Sometimes, it’s to address a lack of climbing opportunities in a geographic area. Other times, it’s to allow for year-round climbing in a location where seasonal weather might impede the ability to climb outside. Still other times, it’s a passion project or more of a community service―a way to introduce a local community and youth to climbing who might not otherwise be exposed to the sport.

Finally, a gym might be opened to serve as a gateway to and training grounds for outdoor climbing. Participants can visit a gym to get introduced to and familiar with the basics of climbing, and then the gym can serve as a springboard to their growth in the sport and training for climbing on natural rock. Since the first climbing gyms, countless gyms have offered instructional courses on gym premises or gym-to-crag guided outdoor trips. This article will focus on how you as a gym operator can manage risk with your single-day gym-to-crag guided outdoor trips.

Taking your operations outside a gym setting does strip away a level of control over certain risk factors. It gets you away from engineered climbing structures, it leaves you more subject to the weather, and it can take you away from easy emergency medical access. This loss of some control makes many insurance carriers a bit wary, but a responsible management plan will help protect your participants and your business, and will protect the larger climbing gym industry from suffering accidents. As with any climbing gym program, we recommend you have your gym-specific operational procedures documented and standardized so that expectations are clearly articulated to your guides and they operate in a similar fashion to one another.

Basic Operations & Staff Training

There are a few reputable associations that provide certifications for outdoor climbing guides and instructors. These associations include the American Mountain Guides Association (AMGA) and the Professional Climbing Instructors Association (PCIA), who both act as a compass in the outdoor climbing guide/instructor world. For basic operational direction, you should refer to them for guidance. They should also be your source of training for outdoor climbing guides, with your guides achieving an AMGA Single Pitch Instructor (SPI) certification for rock climbing or a PCIA Single Pitch Climbing Instructor (SPCI) Certification. If you are offering multi-pitch climbs, an additional minimum certification applies.

Besides climbing-specific training, there’s medical training to consider. How far away is the crag from emergency medical attention? Are your guides equipped to handle an emergency situation until professional medical attention arrives? Possible applicable medical trainings include CPR, First Aid, Wilderness First Aid (WFA), Wilderness First Responder (WFR), or Wilderness Emergency Medical Technician (WEMT). Your guides’ climbing certification or your gym’s insurance carrier may have minimum requirements in this realm. To maintain an AMGA Single Pitch Instructor Certification, for example, the guide must have a current CPR Certification and also must have a current WFR Certification or higher.

When deciding your guide-to-participant ratios for trips, there are a few considerations. You may be subject to requirements by your insurance carrier, or the land operator issuing your permit may have a maximum participant rule. On the ‘maximum number of participants per guide’ side of this decision, you of course want to make sure you have enough guides to effectively supervise your at-height operations for the number of participants you are bringing along.

On the opposite side―‘minimum number of guides to make a trip happen’―there are a few additional considerations. Is the crag in a remote location? If an accident occurred, is one lone guide set up to effectively and efficiently manage the emergency situation? Or do you need a second guide?  For example, do you need one to stay with the injured party and continue CPR while one runs to guide in emergency personnel to the injured party? At least one guide in each group should always be certified at the Single Pitch Instructor level or higher, but other team members may be uncertified guides in training, or apprentices.

As you are structuring your own program’s guide-to-participant ratios, one more thing to think through are potential claims of sexual abuse or molestation. It’s always ideal to have at least 3 total people (guides + participants) on a trip so you avoid 1:1 situations, especially if you have a participant who is a minor. Your insurance carrier may have requirements here as well.

Another operational consideration for outdoor climbing is, of course, the weather. Lightning strikes are always a major weather concern―you don’t want to be caught on top of a mountain in the middle of a thunderstorm! Think about what your operational parameters here will look like and when you will stop climbing and seek shelter. If you’ll have cell service at the crag, you might download a weather app where you can see the proximity of lightning strikes in your area. If you won’t have cell service, perhaps you’ll use the counting method to understand how far away the lightning is from you. Your operational parameters might look something like “wait 15 minutes after the last lightning strike within 10 miles”. While lightning typically gets the spotlight in this category, it’s not the only factor. For effective risk management of climbing with novices, you also need sufficient visibility and audibility.

Gear

You don’t typically see climbing helmets in an indoor setting, but climbing outside has different risks and additional equipment requirements. Participants and staff need to be protected from overhead falling objects while climbing outdoors. Besides your climbing gear, you should also consider personal gear. Providing a required gear list to your participants ahead of time can help make sure they are coming adequately prepared. This can mean synthetic clothing, a rain jacket, appropriate layers, and suitable shoes for the approach. Sending your guides with a few pieces of extra gear on hand is a good idea, maybe with a few ponchos, an extra fleece top, etc.―whatever is appropriate for your local environment. A first aid kit needs to make it on your guide’s gear list, as well.

And finally on the gear list, reliable communication devices need to be required for all climbing locations. If there is dependable cell signal at each of your crags, you can simply require guides to carry cell phones with a full charge on trips. But if cell service can be spotty or non-existent, it’s time to start thinking about other communication devices, like a satellite phone for guides to use in case of an emergency.

Trip Reports

Documentation is key if it comes down to an insurance claim and defending yourself in court. Just as documentation of gear inspections is fundamental, documentation of your outdoor guided trips after they occur can also go a long way to help you in court. It’s recommended to keep trip reports with the guide names, participant names, crag locations, and any guide comments on how the day went, what the weather looked like, and any minor incidents that occurred. If an accident requiring professional medical attention occurs, a full accident report should be completed, just as you do in the climbing gym.

Transportation

How are participants getting to the crag? If they are being driven by guides in a gym-owned bus or shuttle, be aware of the extra risk that brings to the table. We’d recommend having a driver safety training and check-off plan with strict seatbelt requirements for all in the vehicle. The extra risk here especially comes into play with your insurance policy limits. If you are offering participant transportation, it’s a good idea to have an umbrella/excess insurance policy as a part of your insurance program to provide additional limits beyond your general liability policy. This is because you are more prone to accidents that will exceed your basic per occurrence limits.

Waiver & Insurance

When it comes to your waiver, does it include outdoor climbing risks in the acknowledgement of risks? And―often overlooked―does it mention the risk of riding in a bus/shuttle, if you transport your participants in one? Do you have a reliable plan in place to ensure all participants, before getting into a remote area without cell service, have a signed waiver?

You should talk to your insurance agent and ensure that your general liability policy allows for outdoor climbing trips. Many policies have a limitation of coverage to on-site operations that needs to be removed to accomplish adequate coverage for a gym to crag program.

What Does Your Plan Look Like?

You may already have a gym to crag program in place and are reading this article to make sure your risk management plan is keeping up. Or, you may be an existing gym looking at expanding into a new offering. Either way, as our industry is always growing and changing, we’d love to hear what your operation is doing to manage your outdoor guided trips and we’d love to help you brainstorm creative solutions to your own risk management hurdles. Let us know what risk management topics you’d like to see in our future articles!

Let Skyscraper advise for you today,

We Insure Your Vision for a Brighter Tomorrow.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts

Insurance-technology

Specific Technologies Driving Insurtech Investment in 2024

Understanding the Funding Decline The decrease in funding does not necessarily spell trouble for the insurance sector but instead highlights a strategic shift, the report suggests. “The insurance industry, like many sectors, is focusing on the most promising ventures with substantial insurance potential,” the report explains. “Insurers are directing their investments toward key areas and current trends such as embedded insurance, employee benefits, and cyber risk management. This strategic investment approach signals a forward-looking mindset within the industry.” Three Key Insurtech Trends for 2024 The report identifies three major trends shaping insurtech investments in 2024: Public Insurtech Companies: Financial and Growth Strategies The report also notes that public insurtech companies are prioritizing revenue growth as their main goal. These firms are restructuring their financial strategies to boost cash flow and capitalize on rising revenue streams. Their growth prospects are supported by expanding asset portfolios and strong market demand. “Public insurtech companies are focusing on revenue growth and optimizing their financial frameworks to increase cash flow,” the report states. “The growth potential for these companies is driven by increasing revenue opportunities, broadening asset bases, and a robust market for their services.” In summary, while global insurtech funding saw a decline in 2023, the industry’s focus on GenAI, digital process management, and connected insurance technologies is setting the stage for a dynamic and forward-looking 2024.

Read More
Business

Insurer Secures Unanimous Supreme Court Victory in New York Choice of Law Dispute

In the world of sports, a clean sweep, a shutout, or a perfect game is the ultimate achievement. In the legal arena, a unanimous decision from the U.S. Supreme Court is equally rare and significant. In a notable legal triumph, Great Lakes Insurance SE achieved a unanimous 9-0 victory in the Supreme Court on February 21, 2024. This victory follows a protracted legal battle that began in the District Court of Pennsylvania, advanced to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and culminated in the Supreme Court’s decisive ruling. Background of the Case: Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Company The heart of the dispute was the insurance contract’s clause selecting New York law to govern any future legal conflicts. Although the financial implications of this case were relatively minor compared to the broader marine insurance industry, the insurer’s determination to uphold a crucial maritime legal principle has significant long-term implications for marine insurance. Faced with the insured’s counterclaims—including allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, insurance bad faith, and violations of Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices Law—the insurer was confronted with serious risks. Such claims could lead to the shifting of attorney’s fees, treble damages, and more, which might normally encourage insurers to settle rather than risk pursuing justice. However, Great Lakes Insurance, supported by The Goldman Maritime Law Group, opted to challenge the Third Circuit’s decision and seek clarity from the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Ruling: A Landmark Decision In a landmark ruling, Justice Brett Kavanaugh affirmed that choice of law provisions in maritime contracts should be upheld by default. This ruling is a major victory for establishing a consistent federal standard in maritime law and avoiding a patchwork of state laws that could complicate marine insurance disputes. The Supreme Court’s decision overturned the Third Circuit’s earlier judgment, which had questioned whether Pennsylvania’s public policy concerns might override the insurance contract’s choice of New York law. By upholding the New York choice of law clause, the Supreme Court eliminated the extra-contractual bad faith claims under Pennsylvania law, thereby ensuring that the dispute could be resolved based on the merits of the insurance claim itself. Significance of the Supreme Court’s Decision This ruling represents a significant advancement in maritime law, affirming that choice of law clauses in maritime contracts are generally enforceable. The decision establishes a clear, uniform legal framework for resolving maritime contract disputes, which will streamline the process and ensure fair adjudication of future insurance claims. Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion was particularly notable for its criticism of the 1955 Wilburn Boat v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance decision, which had previously influenced maritime insurance law. Thomas argued that Wilburn Boat was incorrectly decided and stressed that a uniform and enforceable set of rules is essential for the development of maritime law. Impact on the Marine Insurance Industry The Supreme Court’s decision sets a “bright-line” rule affirming that choice of law clauses are valid unless there is a strong argument against the selected jurisdiction. By endorsing New York’s insurance laws as a reasonable choice, the ruling supports a more consistent and predictable legal environment for marine insurers. This decision represents a major step forward in maritime law, helping insurers better assess risks, determine premiums, and ensure fair and efficient resolution of maritime insurance disputes.

Read More
Try your instant quote