Search
Close this search box.

Five major challenges of insurance digital transformation

pexels-startup-stock-photos-7374

Five major challenges of insurance digital transformation

Insurance players must become accustomed to these challenges as a way of doing business to thrive — and survive.

It is possible that insurance companies will encounter these five challenges when undergoing digital transformation.

One of the most significant hurdles in insurance digital transformation has been getting people — both customers and employees — to embrace new ways of doing things. However, the pandemic has changed all that; now, many more people are willing to overcome their technological reluctance.

Nevertheless, just because people are willing doesn’t mean transforming your operation will be easy. Here are five challenges insurance industry players will encounter:

1. Multiple systems, combining the future and the past

Unless your company is a startup, you already have processes in place for writing policies, settling claims, and storing data. Just because you start something new, the old systems don’t automatically go away. You don’t want to lose customers who are comfortable with a certain way of business. You also cannot afford to lose the data needed for claims and accounting — the data that may need to be archived for many years.

Furthermore, even if you’re starting a new unit from scratch, technology is not static; it will keep changing. Your new unit’s current digital approach won’t be state-of-the-art forever. Some areas of change, such as data from Pay-How-You-Drive programs, are easy to foresee; others, such as a global pandemic and its impact on systems, may be less predictable. Having a team responsible for these problems — a team that works with those who control your company’s business plan — will give you an edge in meeting and mastering the continuous transformation.

2. User change acceptance and training

Although people may be more willing than before to do as much as they can digitally, this doesn’t mean they are automatically capable of everything required. You might need to design interfaces to be as easy and straightforward to use as possible, always remembering that consumers have many different systems and range from those who are eager to upgrade to the newest technology to those who are not. You should test your platforms on the experienced and the inexperienced and make sure they are as intuitive as possible.

Employees can expect to undergo more training and operate in a more standardized environment. They will be dealing with more complicated situations and will need the ability to master them. In both cases, you will have to dedicate resources to testing and training.

3. Exponential explosion in data

Digital insurance transformation means an explosion in the amount of data that is needed as well as the different ways of processing that data. For example, an insurance company updates catastrophe models every year; to manage risk, it needs to know how many homes and businesses are exposed so that it expands or retracts its writings accordingly. The catastrophe modeling world will need to expand to cover an even broader array of risks in the future. 

Some of the new data being collected may lead to opportunities. For example, feedback to drivers on how well they are driving, such as speeding and hard-braking, can be welcomed by drivers, especially if you include rebates for safer driving. However, the delivery of this information has to be designed and implemented.

With the huge expansion of data and variables, it is important to make sure everyone interprets each item the same way; there are no data quality and completeness issues. For example, a single claim number could be assigned to an automobile accident, or it could be assigned to each party in the automobile accident. Different interpretations can lead to inaccuracies in results and predictions.

Furthermore, due to the multiple core systems, there is little data integration and, at times, no agreement on the critical data assets. You will need to assign staff to manage master data, to make sure data is entered, stored, and consumed consistently, and to develop a comprehensive data strategy across the entire organization to drive business results.

4. Attacks, hacks, and privacy

The number of cyberattacks has been increasing, and that increase will continue. 

Cyberattacks fall into two broad categories. The first is the type that disables the target’s systems. An insurance company might suddenly discover that its website has been disabled and will only be released after a ransom, usually in cryptocurrency, is paid. The second is the type that gets into the target’s systems to either steal or manipulate data.

Insurance companies — especially those that write cyber insurance — have a special responsibility to safeguard their systems and data from being hacked not only as risk managers but also to avoid losing the confidence of their insured. Insurance companies need the right protocols to manage the personal data of their insured securely.

Dealing with the attacks and the privacy issues requires personnel and processes to deal with the multitude of potential risk scenarios.

5. Limited resources

In an environment where the GDP is contracting due to the ravages of the pandemic, you might also be dealing with constrained resources, conflicting priorities, and reduced investments.

Since all challenges will require an investment in time, money, and personnel to address, you will need to find creative solutions. To free up the resources, you may need to assess other expenses critically. For example, travel expenses during the pandemic have been shrinking for many companies. You may discover, too, that you need less commercial office space. Locating the right people can also be a challenge, and you may discover you need external assistance. Time, however, is theoretically available to every player in the insurance industry in the same quantity, except you need to consider disposable time. You can increase the time you have available by adding more people or by cutting other projects or responsibilities.

To effectively manage through the five challenges, your digital transformation requires setting priorities and monitoring the environment constantly to make sure the direction in which you are headed is taking where you want to go. Given the fact that we can expect digital advances to continue, players in the insurance industry must become accustomed to these challenges as a way of doing business. Only if they do so, will they truly thrive! 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts

Insurance-technology

Specific Technologies Driving Insurtech Investment in 2024

Understanding the Funding Decline The decrease in funding does not necessarily spell trouble for the insurance sector but instead highlights a strategic shift, the report suggests. “The insurance industry, like many sectors, is focusing on the most promising ventures with substantial insurance potential,” the report explains. “Insurers are directing their investments toward key areas and current trends such as embedded insurance, employee benefits, and cyber risk management. This strategic investment approach signals a forward-looking mindset within the industry.” Three Key Insurtech Trends for 2024 The report identifies three major trends shaping insurtech investments in 2024: Public Insurtech Companies: Financial and Growth Strategies The report also notes that public insurtech companies are prioritizing revenue growth as their main goal. These firms are restructuring their financial strategies to boost cash flow and capitalize on rising revenue streams. Their growth prospects are supported by expanding asset portfolios and strong market demand. “Public insurtech companies are focusing on revenue growth and optimizing their financial frameworks to increase cash flow,” the report states. “The growth potential for these companies is driven by increasing revenue opportunities, broadening asset bases, and a robust market for their services.” In summary, while global insurtech funding saw a decline in 2023, the industry’s focus on GenAI, digital process management, and connected insurance technologies is setting the stage for a dynamic and forward-looking 2024.

Read More
Business

Insurer Secures Unanimous Supreme Court Victory in New York Choice of Law Dispute

In the world of sports, a clean sweep, a shutout, or a perfect game is the ultimate achievement. In the legal arena, a unanimous decision from the U.S. Supreme Court is equally rare and significant. In a notable legal triumph, Great Lakes Insurance SE achieved a unanimous 9-0 victory in the Supreme Court on February 21, 2024. This victory follows a protracted legal battle that began in the District Court of Pennsylvania, advanced to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and culminated in the Supreme Court’s decisive ruling. Background of the Case: Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Company The heart of the dispute was the insurance contract’s clause selecting New York law to govern any future legal conflicts. Although the financial implications of this case were relatively minor compared to the broader marine insurance industry, the insurer’s determination to uphold a crucial maritime legal principle has significant long-term implications for marine insurance. Faced with the insured’s counterclaims—including allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, insurance bad faith, and violations of Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices Law—the insurer was confronted with serious risks. Such claims could lead to the shifting of attorney’s fees, treble damages, and more, which might normally encourage insurers to settle rather than risk pursuing justice. However, Great Lakes Insurance, supported by The Goldman Maritime Law Group, opted to challenge the Third Circuit’s decision and seek clarity from the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Ruling: A Landmark Decision In a landmark ruling, Justice Brett Kavanaugh affirmed that choice of law provisions in maritime contracts should be upheld by default. This ruling is a major victory for establishing a consistent federal standard in maritime law and avoiding a patchwork of state laws that could complicate marine insurance disputes. The Supreme Court’s decision overturned the Third Circuit’s earlier judgment, which had questioned whether Pennsylvania’s public policy concerns might override the insurance contract’s choice of New York law. By upholding the New York choice of law clause, the Supreme Court eliminated the extra-contractual bad faith claims under Pennsylvania law, thereby ensuring that the dispute could be resolved based on the merits of the insurance claim itself. Significance of the Supreme Court’s Decision This ruling represents a significant advancement in maritime law, affirming that choice of law clauses in maritime contracts are generally enforceable. The decision establishes a clear, uniform legal framework for resolving maritime contract disputes, which will streamline the process and ensure fair adjudication of future insurance claims. Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion was particularly notable for its criticism of the 1955 Wilburn Boat v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance decision, which had previously influenced maritime insurance law. Thomas argued that Wilburn Boat was incorrectly decided and stressed that a uniform and enforceable set of rules is essential for the development of maritime law. Impact on the Marine Insurance Industry The Supreme Court’s decision sets a “bright-line” rule affirming that choice of law clauses are valid unless there is a strong argument against the selected jurisdiction. By endorsing New York’s insurance laws as a reasonable choice, the ruling supports a more consistent and predictable legal environment for marine insurers. This decision represents a major step forward in maritime law, helping insurers better assess risks, determine premiums, and ensure fair and efficient resolution of maritime insurance disputes.

Read More
Try your instant quote