Search
Close this search box.

Cyber risk modeling: Advancements offer new insights

pexels-markus-spiske-113850

Cyber risk modeling: Advancements offer new insights

One company is making headways in helping insurers and brokers understand rapidly evolving cyber threats.

“Lots of risk modeling is based upon data, and understanding that pattern of data and being able to build models from those trends,”

The rapid adoption of digital operations at the onset of COVID-19 stay-at-home orders resulted in explosive cybercriminal activity as businesses’ cyber exposures increased radically.

One analysis from Guidewire reported a 40% increase in ransomware attacks in the first three quarters of 2020 compared to the same period a year prior. Guidewire also found a 350% spike in phishing schemes.

One risk management lesson learned through this pandemic has been that the industry continues to face the very real potential for systemic risks and losses arising from a cyberattack. It follows that the need for risk models and other risk analysis tools has reached a critical level.

Data drives risk modeling

In late January, RMS announced new updates to RMS Cyber Solutions Version 5.0 to reflect the cyber risk landscape’s latest view. The updates incorporated the latest data to offer fresh insights to cyber underwriters and portfolio managers, who can “slice and dice” data to understand the various risk drivers that could affect their portfolios.

This new development is a much-needed advancement in cyber risk modeling, which has historically been challenged by rapidly evolving threats and poorly packaged data. 

“In cyber, we have a threat landscape that is changing; the people who are doing harm are changing; the techniques they use are changing, and the landscape over which they are doing it is changing,” Matt Harrison, director, product management, cyber at RMS, told PropertyCasualty360.com. “If you think back a year and a half ago, most of us probably haven’t heard of Zoom, and yet we live our lives by it now.”

These inherent challenges, paired with the limited years of data, create a difficult market to model risk. However, Harrison emphasizes that just because cyber risk does not have decades of data behind it like other perils, such as hurricanes or wildfires, does not mean that the data is nonexistent.

“It’s important to recognize that there is a lot of data; the problem is that most of that data was never designed for the insurance market,” he said. “The number-one myth to dispel is that there are really robust data and robust science that goes into building models. But you have to work hard to turn the data into something that people can use.”

Cyber coverage today is priced based on prior claims experience; however, RMS has invested heavily in data to create a more well-rounded picture of cyber risk — one that brokers and insurers can easily glean from to produce better cyber products. The firm’s Cyber Solutions leverages datasets from the RMS Cyber Incident Database (CID), comprised of 100,000 data breach events, threat intelligence, dark web scanning, vulnerability management, and outside-in/cyber-hygiene scorers

Now, the firm can describe cyber risks right down to the details of how bad a cyber event could be, why it would be that bad, and at what frequency it is likely to happen. This is key for underwriters to understand how to price coverage and brokers to know so they can advise clients about how certain risks drive rate in the marketplace, Harrison noted.

“There’s no point in buying $1 million in cyber coverage if you’re going to have a $10 million loss,” he said.

A cyber insurance policy also referred to as cyber risk insurance, is designed to help an organization mitigate risk exposure by offsetting costs involved with recovery after a cyber-related security breach or similar event. Quick Quote

http://skyscraperinsurance.com/policies/cyber/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts

Insurance-technology

Specific Technologies Driving Insurtech Investment in 2024

Understanding the Funding Decline The decrease in funding does not necessarily spell trouble for the insurance sector but instead highlights a strategic shift, the report suggests. “The insurance industry, like many sectors, is focusing on the most promising ventures with substantial insurance potential,” the report explains. “Insurers are directing their investments toward key areas and current trends such as embedded insurance, employee benefits, and cyber risk management. This strategic investment approach signals a forward-looking mindset within the industry.” Three Key Insurtech Trends for 2024 The report identifies three major trends shaping insurtech investments in 2024: Public Insurtech Companies: Financial and Growth Strategies The report also notes that public insurtech companies are prioritizing revenue growth as their main goal. These firms are restructuring their financial strategies to boost cash flow and capitalize on rising revenue streams. Their growth prospects are supported by expanding asset portfolios and strong market demand. “Public insurtech companies are focusing on revenue growth and optimizing their financial frameworks to increase cash flow,” the report states. “The growth potential for these companies is driven by increasing revenue opportunities, broadening asset bases, and a robust market for their services.” In summary, while global insurtech funding saw a decline in 2023, the industry’s focus on GenAI, digital process management, and connected insurance technologies is setting the stage for a dynamic and forward-looking 2024.

Read More
Business

Insurer Secures Unanimous Supreme Court Victory in New York Choice of Law Dispute

In the world of sports, a clean sweep, a shutout, or a perfect game is the ultimate achievement. In the legal arena, a unanimous decision from the U.S. Supreme Court is equally rare and significant. In a notable legal triumph, Great Lakes Insurance SE achieved a unanimous 9-0 victory in the Supreme Court on February 21, 2024. This victory follows a protracted legal battle that began in the District Court of Pennsylvania, advanced to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and culminated in the Supreme Court’s decisive ruling. Background of the Case: Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Company The heart of the dispute was the insurance contract’s clause selecting New York law to govern any future legal conflicts. Although the financial implications of this case were relatively minor compared to the broader marine insurance industry, the insurer’s determination to uphold a crucial maritime legal principle has significant long-term implications for marine insurance. Faced with the insured’s counterclaims—including allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, insurance bad faith, and violations of Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices Law—the insurer was confronted with serious risks. Such claims could lead to the shifting of attorney’s fees, treble damages, and more, which might normally encourage insurers to settle rather than risk pursuing justice. However, Great Lakes Insurance, supported by The Goldman Maritime Law Group, opted to challenge the Third Circuit’s decision and seek clarity from the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Ruling: A Landmark Decision In a landmark ruling, Justice Brett Kavanaugh affirmed that choice of law provisions in maritime contracts should be upheld by default. This ruling is a major victory for establishing a consistent federal standard in maritime law and avoiding a patchwork of state laws that could complicate marine insurance disputes. The Supreme Court’s decision overturned the Third Circuit’s earlier judgment, which had questioned whether Pennsylvania’s public policy concerns might override the insurance contract’s choice of New York law. By upholding the New York choice of law clause, the Supreme Court eliminated the extra-contractual bad faith claims under Pennsylvania law, thereby ensuring that the dispute could be resolved based on the merits of the insurance claim itself. Significance of the Supreme Court’s Decision This ruling represents a significant advancement in maritime law, affirming that choice of law clauses in maritime contracts are generally enforceable. The decision establishes a clear, uniform legal framework for resolving maritime contract disputes, which will streamline the process and ensure fair adjudication of future insurance claims. Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion was particularly notable for its criticism of the 1955 Wilburn Boat v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance decision, which had previously influenced maritime insurance law. Thomas argued that Wilburn Boat was incorrectly decided and stressed that a uniform and enforceable set of rules is essential for the development of maritime law. Impact on the Marine Insurance Industry The Supreme Court’s decision sets a “bright-line” rule affirming that choice of law clauses are valid unless there is a strong argument against the selected jurisdiction. By endorsing New York’s insurance laws as a reasonable choice, the ruling supports a more consistent and predictable legal environment for marine insurers. This decision represents a major step forward in maritime law, helping insurers better assess risks, determine premiums, and ensure fair and efficient resolution of maritime insurance disputes.

Read More
Try your instant quote