Search
Close this search box.

A better workers’ comp system: The silver lining of COVID-19?

man-sitting-down-and-using-his-laptop-374085

A better workers’ comp system: The silver lining of COVID-19?

Here are three consequences of the coronavirus pandemic that can fuel positive change in the current workers’ comp structure.

With the COVID-19 crisis, more injured workers are using video chats to meet with health care providers. 

COVID-19 is changing the way we live and will, no doubt, impact the future. This is a dark time, for sure, as we watch in real-time the virus spreading across the nation and the globe. Our smartphones ping with new statistics about the number of people infected and the death toll. The constant news cycle reminds us of the side effects of this pandemic, from the plunging economy to shrinking savings and retirement accounts. Many of us sit at home, working or not, coping with the unnatural and stressful conditions of “social distancing” and “shelter-at-home.”

Imagine what this means for an injured worker on workers’ compensation (WC), who is already coping with the stress of navigating a complex health care system. Add to this the uncertainty about their own risk of infection with COVID-19 and its consequences. It is too early to understand the full impact of the current pandemic on the WC system. But it seems likely that the crisis has the potential to negatively impact both the timeline for injured employees to return to work and the overall WC experience.

Health care providers (HCPs) are seeing an increased volume of patients with suspected COVID-19 infections who come for testing or referral to specialized care. This means they have less time to see patients with non-COVID-related issues, and this may lead to fewer total visits. Many provider practices are no longer seeing patients in person, which means an injured worker’s appointments may be delayed or missed. Even if the HCP has the ability to conduct virtual visits, it will be more difficult to clear an injured worker to return to work.

Shelter-in-place policies have ripple effects on services that employees may have previously relied on, such as public transportation, child care, home delivery or domestic help. Shopping is more difficult and requires extra effort and planning to maintain safety. There may be additional stressors at home such as children that are out of school.

Anxiety and depression are exacerbated in the current circumstances. Consider, for example, the uncertainty about when the current pandemic will subside, the personal risk of infection, the added uncertainty about job security, deteriorating personal finances, or the sudden change in social and family life due to social distancing. The pandemic makes the already tough situation of being injured and out of work even worse.

So, where is the silver lining?

Here are three consequences that can fuel positive change and improve the current system.

1. Restore trust and respect for HCPs

The pandemic is showing people how amazing HCPs are risking their own health and safety for the care of others. We often take these people for granted, and anyone who may have a callous opinion of the health care “system” should not assign blame to HCPs.

It is in times of crisis that the true character of HCPs is evident. Recall the renewed respect and appreciation for the first responders to the 9/11 attacks. Sometimes it takes a crisis to raise awareness and visibility of essential people.

2. Imbue empathy and compassion

Shelter-in-place policies give everyone an opportunity to walk in an injured worker’s shoes. Feeling isolated challenges our positivity, mental health and resiliency. People are receiving experiential training in what it feels like to be stuck at home and the many challenges it presents for daily living, family dynamics and social deprivation.

3. Expand human connection through technology

Widespread advisories to social distance and shelter in place have forced people to rely on technologies such as video conferencing for both work and personal needs. There is a dramatic rise in the use of “telemedicine” and “telerehab,” whereby providers are conducting routine office visits via a video connection. Although such “virtual” visits can’t serve all needs, they have been shown to be effective for many routine checkups and evaluations. Had the current pandemic not forced this adaptation, telemedicine and telehealth may have expanded at a much slower rate.

The crisis has highlighted the essential nature of regular human connection, and it can be a positive stimulus for the WC industry. Beyond telehealth, current technologies can be leveraged to maintain more frequent contact with injured workers. Text messaging, email, or in-app messaging can be used to check in with those employees in real-time to support improved return-to-work outcomes.

What does this all mean for WC?

Now, more than ever, it’s important to establish and maintain close connections with injured workers, whether you’re an employer, provider, carrier or administrator. The pandemic has increased uncertainty for everyone, and the antidote for uncertainty is information, transparency and support.

The experience will give everyone reason to advocate strongly for HCPs and their role in WC. It will help case managers become better advocates for their injured workers. It can accelerate the use of telehealth and other technologies for health and wellness care and catalyze an evolution to a more efficient and connected system.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts

Insurance-technology

Specific Technologies Driving Insurtech Investment in 2024

Understanding the Funding Decline The decrease in funding does not necessarily spell trouble for the insurance sector but instead highlights a strategic shift, the report suggests. “The insurance industry, like many sectors, is focusing on the most promising ventures with substantial insurance potential,” the report explains. “Insurers are directing their investments toward key areas and current trends such as embedded insurance, employee benefits, and cyber risk management. This strategic investment approach signals a forward-looking mindset within the industry.” Three Key Insurtech Trends for 2024 The report identifies three major trends shaping insurtech investments in 2024: Public Insurtech Companies: Financial and Growth Strategies The report also notes that public insurtech companies are prioritizing revenue growth as their main goal. These firms are restructuring their financial strategies to boost cash flow and capitalize on rising revenue streams. Their growth prospects are supported by expanding asset portfolios and strong market demand. “Public insurtech companies are focusing on revenue growth and optimizing their financial frameworks to increase cash flow,” the report states. “The growth potential for these companies is driven by increasing revenue opportunities, broadening asset bases, and a robust market for their services.” In summary, while global insurtech funding saw a decline in 2023, the industry’s focus on GenAI, digital process management, and connected insurance technologies is setting the stage for a dynamic and forward-looking 2024.

Read More
Business

Insurer Secures Unanimous Supreme Court Victory in New York Choice of Law Dispute

In the world of sports, a clean sweep, a shutout, or a perfect game is the ultimate achievement. In the legal arena, a unanimous decision from the U.S. Supreme Court is equally rare and significant. In a notable legal triumph, Great Lakes Insurance SE achieved a unanimous 9-0 victory in the Supreme Court on February 21, 2024. This victory follows a protracted legal battle that began in the District Court of Pennsylvania, advanced to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and culminated in the Supreme Court’s decisive ruling. Background of the Case: Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Company The heart of the dispute was the insurance contract’s clause selecting New York law to govern any future legal conflicts. Although the financial implications of this case were relatively minor compared to the broader marine insurance industry, the insurer’s determination to uphold a crucial maritime legal principle has significant long-term implications for marine insurance. Faced with the insured’s counterclaims—including allegations of breach of fiduciary duty, insurance bad faith, and violations of Pennsylvania’s Unfair Trade Practices Law—the insurer was confronted with serious risks. Such claims could lead to the shifting of attorney’s fees, treble damages, and more, which might normally encourage insurers to settle rather than risk pursuing justice. However, Great Lakes Insurance, supported by The Goldman Maritime Law Group, opted to challenge the Third Circuit’s decision and seek clarity from the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Ruling: A Landmark Decision In a landmark ruling, Justice Brett Kavanaugh affirmed that choice of law provisions in maritime contracts should be upheld by default. This ruling is a major victory for establishing a consistent federal standard in maritime law and avoiding a patchwork of state laws that could complicate marine insurance disputes. The Supreme Court’s decision overturned the Third Circuit’s earlier judgment, which had questioned whether Pennsylvania’s public policy concerns might override the insurance contract’s choice of New York law. By upholding the New York choice of law clause, the Supreme Court eliminated the extra-contractual bad faith claims under Pennsylvania law, thereby ensuring that the dispute could be resolved based on the merits of the insurance claim itself. Significance of the Supreme Court’s Decision This ruling represents a significant advancement in maritime law, affirming that choice of law clauses in maritime contracts are generally enforceable. The decision establishes a clear, uniform legal framework for resolving maritime contract disputes, which will streamline the process and ensure fair adjudication of future insurance claims. Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurring opinion was particularly notable for its criticism of the 1955 Wilburn Boat v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance decision, which had previously influenced maritime insurance law. Thomas argued that Wilburn Boat was incorrectly decided and stressed that a uniform and enforceable set of rules is essential for the development of maritime law. Impact on the Marine Insurance Industry The Supreme Court’s decision sets a “bright-line” rule affirming that choice of law clauses are valid unless there is a strong argument against the selected jurisdiction. By endorsing New York’s insurance laws as a reasonable choice, the ruling supports a more consistent and predictable legal environment for marine insurers. This decision represents a major step forward in maritime law, helping insurers better assess risks, determine premiums, and ensure fair and efficient resolution of maritime insurance disputes.

Read More
Try your instant quote