Shoring up global risk management strategies in times of war

Analysts with Forrester offer insights into the steps risk management professionals should take as Russia’s aggression continues in Ukraine.

The repercussions from the Russian invasion of Ukraine are reverberating in global markets and risk management leaders worldwide are already, or will soon be, dealing with the impact of the war and sanctions, according to analysts with Forrester Research, Inc.

While the U.S. insurance industry has little direct exposure as a result of the Russian invasion, AM Best reported the industry’s indirect exposure could be substantial.

“Indirect investments through suppliers and customers of U.S. and European companies may still be impacted, similarly to the already substantial impact on commodity and energy markets,” Jason Hopper, associate director, industry research and analytics, AM Best, said in a release.

Initial steps to protect against losses

For commercial policyholders with business units exposed to the conflict zone, the first step should be to make plans on how to maintain resilience for those divisions, according to Forrester.

This should include risk managers meeting with chief security officers and IT leaders to review if they are reliant on technology suppliers in the impacted regions and assessing the ability to switch suppliers if need be, Forrester reported. Reviews should also include business continuity plans, supply chain arrangements and alternative third-party vendors.

In addition, executives should be empowered to quickly make decisions on alternative suppliers if the need arises. Employees should also be updated on any heightened risks, including potential attacks and the forms they might take.

Further, businesses should prepare for further supply chain bottlenecks as sanctions and other disruptions are anticipated to cause havoc on supply chains for the coming 24 months, according to Forrester’s analysis. These issues are expected to play out through higher fuel prices and possible shortages as well as increasing costs for freight and travel.

Forrester also anticipates the Russian invasion to worsen the microchip shortage as Ukraine produces around 70% of the global supply of both xenon and neon, critical gases used in semiconductor production.

Moving forward

Once business units facing exposure and supply chain are considered, Forrester suggested that risk managers keep a keen eye on the changing sanction situation, particularly those that might require changes to third-party vendors. As more sanctions are presumed, be proactive in screening third parties, including direct partners, foreign affiliates and customers for ties to Russia, Russian oligarchs, Ukrainian separatists states and Belarus.

Additionally, geopolitical instability should be moved up the enterprise risk management agenda. This should take into account all these new geopolitical risks and impact analysis should incorporate the war in Ukraine as well as its downstream effects.

Taken From: https://www.propertycasualty360.com/2022/03/23/shoring-up-global-risk-management-strategies-in-times-of-war/

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Commercial P&C Insurance

Commercial Office Space Set for a Strong Comeback

The sustained increase in demand for office space across the nation since late 2022 suggests that the market has moved past its lowest point, according to insights from the real estate technology platform, VTS. Demand for office space began to rise in late 2022 and continued into early 2023. Since then, the office market has experienced a period of stability and growth, supported by favorable economic factors, indicating a market rebound. This conclusion is drawn from the VTS Office Demand Index (VODI), which tracks unique new tenant tour requests for office properties in key U.S. markets. The VODI serves as an early indicator of future office leasing activity. According to the index, demand for office space has grown consistently over the past 12 months, closing the second quarter with a 17% year-over-year increase and a 34% rise from the VODI’s lowest point in December 2022. A significant shift in office-based employment patterns further supports the belief that demand for office space has stabilized. After reaching its peak in August 2022, office-based employment declined by 3.9% in early 2024. However, this trend has since stabilized, and employment growth has remained steady. Additionally, a recent decrease in work-from-home rates has fueled the renewed demand for office space. “They say you can only recognize a market bottom after it has passed, and the office space market is no exception. Following what we now see as the bottom, the national demand has gradually increased, though it remains susceptible to economic challenges,” said Nick Romito, CEO of VTS. “However, the growth observed in VODI over the past 18 months, coupled with positive trends in the office-using workforce, suggests that the market has reset, and the worst is behind us.” It’s important to note that this national trend does not impact all local markets equally. Cities like Los Angeles and New York City have seen healthy growth in office space demand, while markets such as San Francisco and Washington, D.C., have experienced prolonged stagnation. In Los Angeles, office space demand surged in the second quarter, briefly surpassing pre-COVID levels, driven by an increase in the average size of office spaces sought by tenants. New York City followed a similar overall pattern, though with some softness in the second quarter. Conversely, San Francisco’s demand for office space remains unpredictable, largely due to its tech-focused workforce, which continues to favor remote work more than other industries. “Markets heavily dependent on the tech sector, like San Francisco and Seattle, are on a markedly different post-COVID recovery path compared to more diversified markets like Los Angeles and New York City. It may take some time before we see office demand in San Francisco and Seattle return to pre-COVID levels,” added Ryan Masiello, Chief Strategy Officer at VTS.

Cyber Liability

Global IT Outage Puts Business Interruption Insurance in the Spotlight

In July, a global IT outage had a significant impact on business interruption insurance policies, overshadowing the effects on cyber insurance coverages. “This incident wasn’t a result of a malicious attack, which is why typical cyber insurance policies may not have been activated,” explained Peter McMurtrie, a partner in West Monroe’s insurance sector, in an interview with PropertyCasualty360.com. “Where coverage was applicable, factors like deductible amounts, waiting periods, and coverage limits played a critical role in determining the extent of exposure,” McMurtrie noted. “Standard policies for small businesses were less likely to offer coverage, while more complex policies for mid-sized companies and Fortune 500 corporations may have included broader triggers for non-malicious outages caused by third-party software issues.” The outage was triggered by a software update on July 19, 2024, by cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike, which affected organizations worldwide using Microsoft Windows. This interruption had far-reaching consequences, including disrupting hospital systems, media outlets, financial institutions, delaying thousands of flights, and halting daily business operations. McMurtrie emphasized that while the initial impact of the outage was similar for both large and small businesses, the ability to recover operations and whether insurance covered the loss of business income varied. “Larger companies are more likely to have advanced disaster recovery plans that ensure service redundancy following unexpected outages,” he added. “Their insurance programs also tend to cover a wider range of incidents.” According to Microsoft, the CrowdStrike update error affected over 8.5 million Windows devices globally. The incident highlighted the interconnected nature of our global ecosystem, including cloud providers, software platforms, security services, and their clients. “It’s a stark reminder of the importance of prioritizing safe deployment and disaster recovery across the tech industry,” the company said in a blog post. McMurtrie pointed out that the outage’s widespread impact was largely due to its effect on organizations that are critical to societal infrastructure—sectors like agriculture, airlines, banking, energy, government, healthcare, manufacturing, and retail. “Insurance companies base their risk appetite on their ability to understand and price risks appropriately. This becomes increasingly challenging with emerging threats,” he said. “However, I anticipate that insurers will respond by clarifying policy language, refining risk selection criteria, and possibly developing new products specifically designed for this evolving exposure.”

Shoring up global risk management strategies in times of war