Search
Close this search box.

The insurance implications from the Russian invasion of Ukraine

russia ukraine

The insurance implications from the Russian invasion of Ukraine

The Russian attack on Ukraine has potential implications for the global insurance industry, and in some cases, for the U.S. insurance industry. In seeking just one word to explain these implications, that word would be “expensive.”

Already we have seen the negative financial impact worldwide from the stock market volatility, oil and commodity prices, merchant cargo and shipping costs, aviation interruptions, disruptions in the banking and investment sectors and loss of Russian imports/exports. Any country, state, territory or entity that does business with Russia will be affected financially, and in most aspects insurance coverage will not be a viable resource due to standard policy exclusions for war and military action, nuclear hazard, governmental action, and acts or decisions.

Inflationary risk

Inflationary risk has and will continue to escalate worldwide, due to the trickle-down effect of the negative financial impact. Even the state of Ohio has already seen inflationary increases due to the loss of Russian imports and exports, and this is likely to affect other states as well.

With huge jumps in imports from 2020-2021, Ohio had Russian imports of mineral fuel and oil of $22 million in 2021; fertilizers of $14.4 million; arms and ammunition of $10.7 million; and paper, paperboard and articles of paper pulp of nearly $1.9 million.

On the export side, Ohio exports to Russia reached nearly $220 million in 2021, including exports of $76.2 million in perfumery and cosmetics and $34.6 million in industrial machinery, including computers.

While these figures seem significant, Russia is number 24 on a list of importing nations to Ohio. Nam Vu, a Miami University professor of economics, in discussing the impact of Ohio with other states, sees the larger issue not being a disruption of Russia’s trading relationship, but rather the larger issue is the overall impact on inflation, “Because that can increase uncertainty, and that can price into a higher level of inflation — and that significantly will increase the recession risk, not only just for Ohio but for many other states as well.”

In reviewing recent AM Best publications on the matter, sanctions may have severe effects on oil and commodity prices, as well as tourism and the economies of less-resilient countries. It will be more challenging for the business operating environment in Russia and for firms conducting business in Russia with current sanctions, and additional sanctions being added that will complicate the situation even further. Sanctions on other financial institutions could lead to further complications or severely worsen the situation, according to Best’s Commentary.

“Further sanctions may impact the ability of international insurers and reinsurers to underwrite Russian risks or make it more difficult for them to service claims on existing policies,” said Anna Sheremeteva, financial analyst, AM Best. “Most affected would be those writing large energy and infrastructure risks, such as London Market insurers, and international reinsurers.”

Aviation insurers have lost premiums, with insurers having stopped coverage for air carriers in Ukraine in mid-February, and airlines are no longer flying in or out of Russia.

Shipping & cargo risk

Merchant ships in Ukraine have been hit, and insurers are either not offering coverage for vessels sailing the Black Sea or demanding huge premiums to do so. The Black Sea is a critical region for agricultural and oil traders, with Ukraine and Russia accounting for more than a quarter of the global trade in wheat and about one-fifth of corn. The Ukrainian ports have now been overtaken by Russia so any ships and cargo there are in jeopardy.

All of the disruptions and lack of cargo movement will only serve to further hamper the supply chain having already been impeded by Covid-19 related disruptions.

War risk

While war is not an insurable risk under traditional insurance, war risk insurance has actually been around since 1914, when the War Risk Insurance Act was passed by the United States Congress to ensure its availability for shipping vessels and individuals during WWI. In general, war risk insurance provides coverage on losses resulting from events such as war, invasions, insurrections, riots, strikes and terrorism. Details on War Risk Insurance can be found in Title 46 of the U.S. Code, Chapter 539. Many re-insurers submitted 48 hours notifications on cancellation of war risk insurance for Ukraine, beginning on Feb 11, 2022.

Political risk

Instability in a country can happen without warning, leaving investors, lenders and contractors unprepared and out of pocket. In the political upheaval, businesses may not be able to operate and their assets may be damaged, none of which would be covered by a standard insurance policy. Political risk insurance helps organizations conducting business around the world protect their assets and financial interests from monetary losses due to specified political risks.

These can be from such losses as being unable to convert currency, government interference and political violence including terrorism. Political risk insurance is designed to protect a business against arbitrary government actions such as confiscation, expropriation and nationalism; selective discrimination; forced divestiture; license cancellation and breach of contract.

It can also include coverage for loss or damage to physical assets as a result of violence, abandonment of assets or abandonment of the foreign operations as a result of political violence.

Further, political risk insurance covers the exposures of importers or exporters in differing scenarios, such as ceasing operations where exports are crucial to the business; or loss of products that only have value if exported.

As has happened with the banking and investment restrictions, political risk can respond when restrictions on foreign exchange prevents remittances relating to dividends, shareholder loan payments, inter company payables, and sale proceeds. Some coverage may be available to project lenders to protect investors against the failure of sovereign governments to meet their debt obligations due to political violence. Political risk insurance for contractors may provide coverage to construction, engineering, and other contracting firms against associated losses due to political upheaval or government action.

Taken from : https://www.propertycasualty360.com/2022/03/04/russian-attack-what-are-the-insurance-implications-414-218617/?kw=The%20insurance%20implications%20from%20the%20Russian%20invasion%20of%20Ukraine&utm_source=email&utm_medium=enl&utm_campaign=dailynews&utm_content=20220304&utm_term=pc360&enlcmp=nltrplt2

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts

Commercial P&C Insurance

Commercial Office Space Set for a Strong Comeback

The sustained increase in demand for office space across the nation since late 2022 suggests that the market has moved past its lowest point, according to insights from the real estate technology platform, VTS. Demand for office space began to rise in late 2022 and continued into early 2023. Since then, the office market has experienced a period of stability and growth, supported by favorable economic factors, indicating a market rebound. This conclusion is drawn from the VTS Office Demand Index (VODI), which tracks unique new tenant tour requests for office properties in key U.S. markets. The VODI serves as an early indicator of future office leasing activity. According to the index, demand for office space has grown consistently over the past 12 months, closing the second quarter with a 17% year-over-year increase and a 34% rise from the VODI’s lowest point in December 2022. A significant shift in office-based employment patterns further supports the belief that demand for office space has stabilized. After reaching its peak in August 2022, office-based employment declined by 3.9% in early 2024. However, this trend has since stabilized, and employment growth has remained steady. Additionally, a recent decrease in work-from-home rates has fueled the renewed demand for office space. “They say you can only recognize a market bottom after it has passed, and the office space market is no exception. Following what we now see as the bottom, the national demand has gradually increased, though it remains susceptible to economic challenges,” said Nick Romito, CEO of VTS. “However, the growth observed in VODI over the past 18 months, coupled with positive trends in the office-using workforce, suggests that the market has reset, and the worst is behind us.” It’s important to note that this national trend does not impact all local markets equally. Cities like Los Angeles and New York City have seen healthy growth in office space demand, while markets such as San Francisco and Washington, D.C., have experienced prolonged stagnation. In Los Angeles, office space demand surged in the second quarter, briefly surpassing pre-COVID levels, driven by an increase in the average size of office spaces sought by tenants. New York City followed a similar overall pattern, though with some softness in the second quarter. Conversely, San Francisco’s demand for office space remains unpredictable, largely due to its tech-focused workforce, which continues to favor remote work more than other industries. “Markets heavily dependent on the tech sector, like San Francisco and Seattle, are on a markedly different post-COVID recovery path compared to more diversified markets like Los Angeles and New York City. It may take some time before we see office demand in San Francisco and Seattle return to pre-COVID levels,” added Ryan Masiello, Chief Strategy Officer at VTS.

Read More
Cyber Liability

Global IT Outage Puts Business Interruption Insurance in the Spotlight

In July, a global IT outage had a significant impact on business interruption insurance policies, overshadowing the effects on cyber insurance coverages. “This incident wasn’t a result of a malicious attack, which is why typical cyber insurance policies may not have been activated,” explained Peter McMurtrie, a partner in West Monroe’s insurance sector, in an interview with PropertyCasualty360.com. “Where coverage was applicable, factors like deductible amounts, waiting periods, and coverage limits played a critical role in determining the extent of exposure,” McMurtrie noted. “Standard policies for small businesses were less likely to offer coverage, while more complex policies for mid-sized companies and Fortune 500 corporations may have included broader triggers for non-malicious outages caused by third-party software issues.” The outage was triggered by a software update on July 19, 2024, by cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike, which affected organizations worldwide using Microsoft Windows. This interruption had far-reaching consequences, including disrupting hospital systems, media outlets, financial institutions, delaying thousands of flights, and halting daily business operations. McMurtrie emphasized that while the initial impact of the outage was similar for both large and small businesses, the ability to recover operations and whether insurance covered the loss of business income varied. “Larger companies are more likely to have advanced disaster recovery plans that ensure service redundancy following unexpected outages,” he added. “Their insurance programs also tend to cover a wider range of incidents.” According to Microsoft, the CrowdStrike update error affected over 8.5 million Windows devices globally. The incident highlighted the interconnected nature of our global ecosystem, including cloud providers, software platforms, security services, and their clients. “It’s a stark reminder of the importance of prioritizing safe deployment and disaster recovery across the tech industry,” the company said in a blog post. McMurtrie pointed out that the outage’s widespread impact was largely due to its effect on organizations that are critical to societal infrastructure—sectors like agriculture, airlines, banking, energy, government, healthcare, manufacturing, and retail. “Insurance companies base their risk appetite on their ability to understand and price risks appropriately. This becomes increasingly challenging with emerging threats,” he said. “However, I anticipate that insurers will respond by clarifying policy language, refining risk selection criteria, and possibly developing new products specifically designed for this evolving exposure.”

Read More
Try your instant quote