Search
Close this search box.

Why selecting diverse law firms makes sense for insurers

pexels-august-de-richelieu-4427626

Why selecting diverse law firms makes sense for insurers

Changing law firms is always risky, and asking an insurer to leave a longstanding relationship due to a firm’s lack of diversity is difficult.

When you’re arguing a bad-faith case in a tough jurisdiction, you can’t afford mistakes that could alienate your jurors. Years ago, a senior partner and I defended a bad-faith case before a racially diverse jury. The senior partner planned to make a comment in his opening argument that may have seemed relatively mild, but I knew the African American jurors could take it the wrong way. I talked to him about it, and he made the same point differently. We watched as a few jurors nodded appreciatively.

This is why law firm diversity matters to insurers. The more diverse a law firm is, the better it can represent its clients. Law firm diversity can lead to meaningful settlements in mediation and arbitration, as a diverse attorney can build trust with diverse plaintiffs. At trial, it enables insurers to relate to diverse juries. Diversity can even help in document review. When I was a junior associate, I noticed a phrase in a document that my colleagues missed. That phrase ultimately helped convince the plaintiff to withdraw her lawsuit.

Like most worthwhile tasks, law firm diversity is easier said than done. Last January, a New York Times article reported on a LinkedIn post touting a prominent law firm’s incoming partner class, which included 11 white men and one white woman. The alarming lack of diversity led a leading legal website to write an open letter — signed by major global employers — calling on the firm to “reflect the diversity of the legal community.” But when the Times reporter asked one of the letter writers if she’d fire her company’s longtime counsel if his firm weren’t diverse enough, she said, “I trust him so much, I can’t see walking away.”

Understand unconscious bias

Changing law firms is always risky, and asking an insurer to leave a longstanding attorney due to a firm’s lack of diversity is difficult. But it’s also hard to spark change when you’ve worked with the same people since 1975. In 2020, with protesters demanding social justice and the Black Lives Matter movement taking hold, embracing law firms with a proven track record of diversity is imperative.

Unfortunately, law firms have a long way to go toward increasing diversity. They should start now by taking a long, hard look at themselves and how they groom their young minority associates for future partner or equity partner status. These promotions aren’t about billable hours or even quality of work; they’re about how well senior partners relate to their associates. And partners naturally gravitate toward people from their own gender, race or sexual orientation.

A 2014 experiment demonstrated how this type of unconscious bias can disguise itself as an objective evaluation. A leadership consulting company sent a memo with 22 errors to 60 partners at 22 law firms. The memos were identical. But half the recipients were told a white person wrote the memo; the other half were told an African American person wrote it. Attorneys receiving the “white” memo rated the writer 4.1 out of 5. Attorneys receiving the “African American” memo rated the writer a 3.2 out of 5. One can imagine that these same attorneys would consequently give the “white” memo writer more opportunities and career support than the equally qualified African American writer.

Law firms can reduce the impact of unconscious bias by actively seeking out and promoting women and people of color. For example, Dan Kohane, past president of the Federation for Defense & Corporate Counsel (FDCC) noticed me at a conference and invited me to an FDCC event. There, he introduced me to another past president, Tim Pratt, and they invited me to apply. Today, I’m a proud member of FDCC’s Board of Directors, co-chair of its Data Privacy section, and vice-chair of its Diversity Committee, all because someone actively sought me out.

Most firms still use the same recruitment techniques they did in 1975, and unsurprisingly, get the same results. Firms should shake up the status quo by recruiting from historically Black colleges and universities, asking law schools’ Black student associations for their best and brightest, and seeking recommendations from African American professors.

Achieving diversity at law firms will not be easy. It will not take months, but years. You may or may not have to break up with your long-time counsel to make it happen. But you should consider the value diverse counsel can bring to your business. It will send an important message to law firms at a pivotal time in history.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts

Commercial P&C Insurance

Commercial Office Space Set for a Strong Comeback

The sustained increase in demand for office space across the nation since late 2022 suggests that the market has moved past its lowest point, according to insights from the real estate technology platform, VTS. Demand for office space began to rise in late 2022 and continued into early 2023. Since then, the office market has experienced a period of stability and growth, supported by favorable economic factors, indicating a market rebound. This conclusion is drawn from the VTS Office Demand Index (VODI), which tracks unique new tenant tour requests for office properties in key U.S. markets. The VODI serves as an early indicator of future office leasing activity. According to the index, demand for office space has grown consistently over the past 12 months, closing the second quarter with a 17% year-over-year increase and a 34% rise from the VODI’s lowest point in December 2022. A significant shift in office-based employment patterns further supports the belief that demand for office space has stabilized. After reaching its peak in August 2022, office-based employment declined by 3.9% in early 2024. However, this trend has since stabilized, and employment growth has remained steady. Additionally, a recent decrease in work-from-home rates has fueled the renewed demand for office space. “They say you can only recognize a market bottom after it has passed, and the office space market is no exception. Following what we now see as the bottom, the national demand has gradually increased, though it remains susceptible to economic challenges,” said Nick Romito, CEO of VTS. “However, the growth observed in VODI over the past 18 months, coupled with positive trends in the office-using workforce, suggests that the market has reset, and the worst is behind us.” It’s important to note that this national trend does not impact all local markets equally. Cities like Los Angeles and New York City have seen healthy growth in office space demand, while markets such as San Francisco and Washington, D.C., have experienced prolonged stagnation. In Los Angeles, office space demand surged in the second quarter, briefly surpassing pre-COVID levels, driven by an increase in the average size of office spaces sought by tenants. New York City followed a similar overall pattern, though with some softness in the second quarter. Conversely, San Francisco’s demand for office space remains unpredictable, largely due to its tech-focused workforce, which continues to favor remote work more than other industries. “Markets heavily dependent on the tech sector, like San Francisco and Seattle, are on a markedly different post-COVID recovery path compared to more diversified markets like Los Angeles and New York City. It may take some time before we see office demand in San Francisco and Seattle return to pre-COVID levels,” added Ryan Masiello, Chief Strategy Officer at VTS.

Read More
Cyber Liability

Global IT Outage Puts Business Interruption Insurance in the Spotlight

In July, a global IT outage had a significant impact on business interruption insurance policies, overshadowing the effects on cyber insurance coverages. “This incident wasn’t a result of a malicious attack, which is why typical cyber insurance policies may not have been activated,” explained Peter McMurtrie, a partner in West Monroe’s insurance sector, in an interview with PropertyCasualty360.com. “Where coverage was applicable, factors like deductible amounts, waiting periods, and coverage limits played a critical role in determining the extent of exposure,” McMurtrie noted. “Standard policies for small businesses were less likely to offer coverage, while more complex policies for mid-sized companies and Fortune 500 corporations may have included broader triggers for non-malicious outages caused by third-party software issues.” The outage was triggered by a software update on July 19, 2024, by cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike, which affected organizations worldwide using Microsoft Windows. This interruption had far-reaching consequences, including disrupting hospital systems, media outlets, financial institutions, delaying thousands of flights, and halting daily business operations. McMurtrie emphasized that while the initial impact of the outage was similar for both large and small businesses, the ability to recover operations and whether insurance covered the loss of business income varied. “Larger companies are more likely to have advanced disaster recovery plans that ensure service redundancy following unexpected outages,” he added. “Their insurance programs also tend to cover a wider range of incidents.” According to Microsoft, the CrowdStrike update error affected over 8.5 million Windows devices globally. The incident highlighted the interconnected nature of our global ecosystem, including cloud providers, software platforms, security services, and their clients. “It’s a stark reminder of the importance of prioritizing safe deployment and disaster recovery across the tech industry,” the company said in a blog post. McMurtrie pointed out that the outage’s widespread impact was largely due to its effect on organizations that are critical to societal infrastructure—sectors like agriculture, airlines, banking, energy, government, healthcare, manufacturing, and retail. “Insurance companies base their risk appetite on their ability to understand and price risks appropriately. This becomes increasingly challenging with emerging threats,” he said. “However, I anticipate that insurers will respond by clarifying policy language, refining risk selection criteria, and possibly developing new products specifically designed for this evolving exposure.”

Read More
Try your instant quote