Search
Close this search box.

COVID-19 Risks Employers Need to Be Aware of: From OSHA to Lawsuits

pexels-gustavo-fring-3983405

COVID-19 Risks Employers Need to Be Aware of: From OSHA to Lawsuits

The two best defenses employers have against the spread of COVID-19 in the workplace are knowledge and vigilance. 

The first part is simple enough. By now, most people have some knowledge about the coronavirus, how it’s transmitted, and its symptoms and possible health complications, as well as who’s most likely to experience severe cases. We also know what to do to minimize the spread—why measures such as face masks, handwashing, and social distancing are so important.

It’s the second part—vigilance—that presents perhaps the greater challenge.

Months into the pandemic, it’s all too easy to become impatient or complacent. If you’re like most people, you’re exhausted right now—tired of hearing about COVID-19, tired of the many precautions we need to take, tired of the doom and gloom in the news cycle, just plain tired. We all want life to return to normal, or to find a sustainable “new normal,” as quickly as possible.

But we can’t let these feelings get to us. You might be exasperated and profoundly bored by the COVID-19 pandemic, but you can’t become negligent. You can’t afford to let your organization slip into indifference or bad habits. Otherwise, you could jeopardize countless people’s health and safety (your employees’, your customers’, your own) as well as the future of your organization. You might even wind up facing litigation.

4 COVID-19 Risk Areas for Employers

Indeed, for employers, COVID-19 is more than a health and safety risk. It can also pose painful legal, financial, and operational consequences in terms of the following:

  1. Regulatory enforcement by the Occupational Health and Safety Administration, the Federal Trade Commission, and various other federal, state, and local agencies
  2. Litigation from employees and customers
  3. Reputational damage
  4. Intangible risks such as loss of workplace morale, diminished productivity, and reduced trust among employees

As with dealing with the virus itself, controlling these risks requires knowledge and vigilance. The health and safety experts here at KPA are here to help. In this article and several more to follow, we’ll be sharing information about avoiding COVID-19-related enforcement, litigation, reputational damage, and other risks.

Let’s start with risk areas 1 and 2.

Please note that this article is intended for general informational purposes only and may not reflect the current law in your jurisdiction. Nothing in this article should be construed as legal advice or guidance.

COVID-19 Regulatory Risks

From OSHA and the FTC to state and local mandates, there are numerous COVID-19-related rules and regulations employers need to be aware of. At all levels of government, more and more agencies are stepping in to take businesses to task for not adequately protecting workers during the pandemic.

OSHA Enforcement

First, there’s OSHA, the Department of Labor arm that ensures employers provide employees with safe, hazard-free working environments. In the early days of the COVID-19 outbreak in the United States, OSHA was conspicuously quiet, as the Administration had taken a step back in order to protect its officers in the field, as well as to learn more about the situation and the pandemic’s impact on the workplace.

That changed on May 19th, when, in a national news release, OSHA signaled the return of enforcement with two new policies:

  1. First, OSHA announced it would be “increasing in-person inspections at all types of workplaces,” with agents prioritizing COVID-19 inspections and using all available enforcement tools.
  2. Second, OSHA notified employers of a new policy for recording coronavirus cases. OSHA now considers COVID-19 is “a recordable illness,” which means employers are responsible for recording every new confirmed, work-related case. In other words, any instance of COVID-19 infection in the workplace must be documented on OSHA Form 300.

Compliance with the new policies can be challenging, particularly in regard to the question of work-relatedness. Note that OSHA expects employers to “make reasonable efforts, based on the evidence available to the employer, to ascertain whether a particular case of coronavirus is work-related.”

OSHA Regulations

OSHA regards COVID-19 as a “recognized hazard,” meaning that employers have a fundamental responsibility to protect their employees from it under the general duty clause.

Additionally, however, there are several specific OSHA standards that also apply to the pandemic. Examples include 29 CFR 1904 (Recording and Reporting Occupational Injuries and Illness), 29 CFR 1910 Subpart Z (Toxic and Hazardous Substances), and the personal protective equipment standards in 29 CFR 1910 Subpart I. These standards indicate the Administration’s enforcement priorities—they’re the kinds of risks an inspector would be looking for first during a site visit.

Employee Complaints

OSHA has always relied on whistleblowers to draw attention to unsafe working conditions, and the COVID-19 pandemic is no different in that respect. OSHA’s coronavirus enforcement is driven by employee complaints. In the past few months, the Administration has received thousands of complaints from workers across the US. Complaints allege violations and hazards such as the following:

  • failure to perform a detailed risk assessment and implement a site-specific protection program
  • failure to implement or enforce a social distancing policy
  • failure to maintain an injury and illness prevention program
  • insufficient workplace cleaning and sanitization
  • failure to provide employees with Safety Data Sheets for new sanitizing chemicals introduced to the workplace
  • inadequate training for employees on COVID-19 prevention and the use of PPE

State Mandates

On top of their OSHA requirements, employers in various states are subject to even more stringent COVID-19 prevention rules and regulations.

Businesses in California, for instance, are subject to dozens of new Cal/OSHA and CDPH requirements.

In Virginia, meanwhile, employers must comply with statewide COVID-19 workplace safety standards, including…

  • the implementation of social distancing, face covering, and handwashing policies
  • the completion of hazard assessments by job category
  • notification to all employees within 24 hours if an employee tests positive for COVID-19
  • mandatory “infectious disease preparedness and response plans, record keeping, training, and hazard communications”

New Processes = New Compliance Risks

Wherever they do business, employers need to be careful that any new COVID-19 policies and processes don’t create additional compliance risks.

Certain illness prevention measures may interfere with an organization’s ability to meet other regulatory requirements. For example, a face covering can make it difficult to verify a customer’s identity, while doing business remotely can cause problems with paperwork and data information security.

COVID-19 Legal Risks

As if the regulatory risks weren’t enough, there are countless coronavirus-related legal risks employers need to be careful to avoid.

Employee Lawsuits

In 2020, employers have faced hundreds of lawsuits (both from individual plaintiffs and class action suits) that have resulted directly from the COVID-19 pandemic. While their circumstances are new, the cases have largely resembled typical employee-versus-employer disputes. You can find an interactive map of these lawsuits at Fisher Phillips’ COVID-19 Employment Litigation Tracker page.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts

Commercial P&C Insurance

Commercial Office Space Set for a Strong Comeback

The sustained increase in demand for office space across the nation since late 2022 suggests that the market has moved past its lowest point, according to insights from the real estate technology platform, VTS. Demand for office space began to rise in late 2022 and continued into early 2023. Since then, the office market has experienced a period of stability and growth, supported by favorable economic factors, indicating a market rebound. This conclusion is drawn from the VTS Office Demand Index (VODI), which tracks unique new tenant tour requests for office properties in key U.S. markets. The VODI serves as an early indicator of future office leasing activity. According to the index, demand for office space has grown consistently over the past 12 months, closing the second quarter with a 17% year-over-year increase and a 34% rise from the VODI’s lowest point in December 2022. A significant shift in office-based employment patterns further supports the belief that demand for office space has stabilized. After reaching its peak in August 2022, office-based employment declined by 3.9% in early 2024. However, this trend has since stabilized, and employment growth has remained steady. Additionally, a recent decrease in work-from-home rates has fueled the renewed demand for office space. “They say you can only recognize a market bottom after it has passed, and the office space market is no exception. Following what we now see as the bottom, the national demand has gradually increased, though it remains susceptible to economic challenges,” said Nick Romito, CEO of VTS. “However, the growth observed in VODI over the past 18 months, coupled with positive trends in the office-using workforce, suggests that the market has reset, and the worst is behind us.” It’s important to note that this national trend does not impact all local markets equally. Cities like Los Angeles and New York City have seen healthy growth in office space demand, while markets such as San Francisco and Washington, D.C., have experienced prolonged stagnation. In Los Angeles, office space demand surged in the second quarter, briefly surpassing pre-COVID levels, driven by an increase in the average size of office spaces sought by tenants. New York City followed a similar overall pattern, though with some softness in the second quarter. Conversely, San Francisco’s demand for office space remains unpredictable, largely due to its tech-focused workforce, which continues to favor remote work more than other industries. “Markets heavily dependent on the tech sector, like San Francisco and Seattle, are on a markedly different post-COVID recovery path compared to more diversified markets like Los Angeles and New York City. It may take some time before we see office demand in San Francisco and Seattle return to pre-COVID levels,” added Ryan Masiello, Chief Strategy Officer at VTS.

Read More
Cyber Liability

Global IT Outage Puts Business Interruption Insurance in the Spotlight

In July, a global IT outage had a significant impact on business interruption insurance policies, overshadowing the effects on cyber insurance coverages. “This incident wasn’t a result of a malicious attack, which is why typical cyber insurance policies may not have been activated,” explained Peter McMurtrie, a partner in West Monroe’s insurance sector, in an interview with PropertyCasualty360.com. “Where coverage was applicable, factors like deductible amounts, waiting periods, and coverage limits played a critical role in determining the extent of exposure,” McMurtrie noted. “Standard policies for small businesses were less likely to offer coverage, while more complex policies for mid-sized companies and Fortune 500 corporations may have included broader triggers for non-malicious outages caused by third-party software issues.” The outage was triggered by a software update on July 19, 2024, by cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike, which affected organizations worldwide using Microsoft Windows. This interruption had far-reaching consequences, including disrupting hospital systems, media outlets, financial institutions, delaying thousands of flights, and halting daily business operations. McMurtrie emphasized that while the initial impact of the outage was similar for both large and small businesses, the ability to recover operations and whether insurance covered the loss of business income varied. “Larger companies are more likely to have advanced disaster recovery plans that ensure service redundancy following unexpected outages,” he added. “Their insurance programs also tend to cover a wider range of incidents.” According to Microsoft, the CrowdStrike update error affected over 8.5 million Windows devices globally. The incident highlighted the interconnected nature of our global ecosystem, including cloud providers, software platforms, security services, and their clients. “It’s a stark reminder of the importance of prioritizing safe deployment and disaster recovery across the tech industry,” the company said in a blog post. McMurtrie pointed out that the outage’s widespread impact was largely due to its effect on organizations that are critical to societal infrastructure—sectors like agriculture, airlines, banking, energy, government, healthcare, manufacturing, and retail. “Insurance companies base their risk appetite on their ability to understand and price risks appropriately. This becomes increasingly challenging with emerging threats,” he said. “However, I anticipate that insurers will respond by clarifying policy language, refining risk selection criteria, and possibly developing new products specifically designed for this evolving exposure.”

Read More
Try your instant quote