Search
Close this search box.

Texas was warned its grid would fail in cold — and it did

FORT WORTH, TX - FEBRUARY 16: Pike Electric service trucks line up after a snow storm on February 16, 2021 in Fort Worth, Texas. Winter storm Uri has brought historic cold weather to Texas and storms have swept across 26 states with a mix of freezing temperatures and precipitation. (Photo by Ron Jenkins/Getty Images)

Texas was warned its grid would fail in cold — and it did

A decade ago, regulators said the power plants couldn’t withstand bitterly cold weather. Now, 4 million people are in the dark.

Transmission towers and power lines lead to a substation after a snowstorm on February 16, 2021, in Fort Worth, Texas.

(Bloomberg) — Federal regulators warned Texas that its power plants couldn’t be counted on to reliably churn out electricity in bitterly cold conditions a decade ago when the last deep freeze plunged 4 million people into the dark.

They recommended that utilities use more insulation, heat pipes and take other steps to winterize plants — strategies commonly observed in cooler climates but not in normally balmy Texas.

“Where did those recommendations go, and how were they implemented?” said Jeff Dennis, managing director of Advanced Energy Economy, an association of clean energy businesses. “Those are going to be some pretty key questions.”

As investigators probe the current power crisis in Texas, which has left millions of people without power or a promise of when it will be restored, questions are sure to be raised about how the state responded to the urgings from the 2011 analysis, issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the North America Electric Reliability Corporation, which sets reliability standards.

The February 2011 incident occurred when an Arctic cold front descended on the Southwest, sending temperatures below freezing for four days in a row. The result was disastrous. Equipment and instruments froze, forcing the shutdown of power plants and rolling blackouts, according to the report.

The failures have already spurred a tangle of finger-pointing, with Texas Governor Greg Abbott calling on leaders of the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, the state’s grid operator, to resign.

“Many generators failed to adequately apply and institutionalize knowledge and recommendations from previous severe winter weather events, especially as to winterization of generation and plant auxiliary equipment,” the 2011 report said.

Although Ercot has called for companies to winterize their facilities, it can’t force them to do so.

Representatives of Ercot did not respond to emailed questions asking specifically about why key recommendations from 2011 went unheeded. But asked about the need for more weatherization in news conferences on Feb. 16 and 17, Ercot officials said that while it has called for companies to harden their facilities, it can’t force them to do so.

Power generators have voluntary guidelines to follow and already have a financial incentive to keep plants running during cold snaps when prices spike, Dan Woodfin, Ercot senior director of system operations, told reporters Tuesday, Feb. 16.

“There aren’t regulatory penalties at the current time” for not complying with the weatherization guidelines, Woodfin said.

A state law enacted after the 2011 freeze authorized the Public Utility Commission of Texas to require power companies to disclose their weatherization efforts. But the state has not gone further in mandating the precautions.

Some steps were taken to harden assets after 2011, and more will probably be spurred by this storm, said Alan Scheller-Wolf, a professor of operations management at Carnegie Mellon University’s Tepper School of Business. But economic factors — including how much consumers will tolerate in the form of higher electricity prices — will play a role in those decisions.

Separate grid

“Are you going to winterize if you don’t get your money back?” Scheller-Wolf questioned. “The Texas industry values less regulatory mandates and they value having their separate detached power grid, so I would find it unlikely that they are going to hit their companies with a raft of regulation.”

Power companies have little incentive to make investments in winterization they may not recoup, said Adrian Shelley, Texas office director of the advocacy group Public Citizen.

In the 1989 storm, wind chills reached 14 degrees below zero in Texas, forcing power plants to operate below capacity or fail to start altogether. And after that storm, as with the 2011 episode, regulators issued a slate of recommendations aimed at improving winterization.

“These recommendations were not mandatory, and over the course of time implementation lapsed,” FERC and NERC said in their 357-page report in 2011. “Many of the generators that experienced outages in 1989 failed again in 2011.”

The report recommended dozens of changes for lawmakers, regulators and power plants in the southern U.S. Among them: wider adoption of reliability standards to harden power plants and related equipment against the cold. Wind barriers, better insulation and heating systems could be installed, for example.

Similar steps are already taken to protect power plants and wind farms in reliably colder climates, from Norway to Canada.

Arctic blast

Southwestern power regulators should “prepare for the winter season with the same sense of urgency and priority as they prepare for the summer peak season,” NERC and FERC warned.

The failures this week underscore how much work still needs to be done.

Wind farms were paralyzed as rain and plummeting temperatures locked up turbines. Frozen instruments triggered shutdowns at some natural gas and coal plants. Natural gas flows were pinched as wells froze shut and supplies were diverted to home heating instead of power plants. Icy water even briefly took a nuclear plant in south Texas offline.

The unusual nature of this storm — with cold temperatures and winds buffeting plants — is also a factor, Ercot’s Woodfin said. “It’s been more severe than anything that’s happened before,” Woodfin said in a call Wednesday.

He cited freezing moisture in instrumentation lines as well as problems with trucked-in deliveries of water to one plant Wednesday morning.

There are myriad reasons Texas has seen outages, but many of the failures are likely tied to simply being unprepared for extreme cold weather — the same kind of problems highlighted in 2011, said Joshua Rhodes, a research associate at the University of Texas at Austin’s Webber Energy Group.

The current Arctic blast — which caused temperatures to fall two degrees below zero in Dallas on Tuesday — is far worse than 2011. For Texas grid operators and power generators, the question going forward will be whether they take steps to deal with the next bad winter storm.

“It’s never happened before,” Rhodes said. “But now it has happened, so we’re going to have to figure out do we plan for this? If so it will probably be more expensive.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts

Cyber Liability

The Rising Importance of Cyber Insurance for Startups

The landscape of cybersecurity is shifting rapidly, making cyber insurance a critical safeguard for startups. According to Embroker’s 2024 Cyber Risk Index: Startup Edition, 93% of startups now carry cyber insurance, a significant increase from 86% just two years ago. This trend reflects growing concerns over cyberattacks, with 81% of startup founders having faced a cyberattack in their career—up from 67% in 2022. Why Cyber Insurance Matters for Startups Startups face mounting pressures from investors, boards, and clients to maintain cyber coverage. In fact, 41% of founders say cyber insurance has helped them secure funding, underscoring its role beyond protection. As Andy Lea, Embroker’s chief insurance officer, explains, “Cyber insurance is becoming more important, not just for protection but as a business enabler, given the prominence of cyber breaches in the news.” Factors Driving Cyber Coverage Adoption Several elements are pushing startups toward cyber insurance: Moreover, 87% of startups are planning new cyber protection measures for 2025, while nine in 10 have a dedicated cybersecurity team or vendor. Confidence in Coverage Interestingly, while only 7% of startups opted for the most comprehensive cyber insurance in 2024, most founders remain optimistic about their policies. A substantial 66% believe their current coverage fully addresses their risk, up significantly from 30% in 2022. As cyber threats evolve, startups are increasingly prioritizing insurance as part of their resilience strategy, reflecting a broader industry shift toward proactive risk management.

Read More
Insurance-technology

Hard Market Needs Tech & Creativity: Navigating Challenges in the Insurance Industry

The insurance market is experiencing significant instability due to inflation, the global pandemic, evolving cybersecurity risks, and climate change. According to experts at Send’s INFUSE webinar titled Navigating the Hard Insurance Market, innovative technology and creative product design could be key in bringing stability to this challenging environment. Rising Risks and Challenges The growing frequency of weather-related disasters has especially made risk assessment difficult for insurers. Tandis Nili, managing principal of global risk management at Epic Insurance Brokers, highlighted that underwriting has struggled to keep pace. “Weather patterns are changing rapidly, and the underwriting models we’ve relied on are no longer sufficient,” Nili remarked. The traditional methods of predicting risks, based on past events, are no longer applicable as 100-year events are now happening much more frequently. Leveraging Technology for Stability Martina Conlon, executive principal at Datos Insights, emphasized the importance of utilizing automation and artificial intelligence (AI) to address this volatility. AI-driven predictive models, she explained, can assist insurers in making more accurate risk assessments, which in turn leads to better pricing and more efficient processes. “It’s all about moving beyond traditional tools like spreadsheets and policy systems,” Conlon said. By integrating more advanced technology, insurers can streamline operations and enhance accuracy in their assessments. Creative Product Innovation Another critical aspect in managing the hard market is innovative product design. Jennifer Kyung, CEO of NextGen Underwriting, discussed the opportunities for insurers to rethink product structures. This could involve adding new lines for emerging risks or restructuring existing products to share the responsibility between insurers and clients. For example, home insurance policies could evolve, particularly in regions facing heightened risks due to climate change. “This is a real opportunity for underwriters to creatively design products that better align with future risk landscapes,” Kyung added. Preparedness: A Key Lesson Lastly, the past few years have highlighted the need for insurers to be prepared for the unexpected. While it’s impossible to predict future events, the industry can ensure that it has the right tools and capabilities in place to respond swiftly and effectively when crises arise. As Kyung put it, “We may not predict what’s coming, but we can be ready for whatever it is.” Conclusion In today’s volatile market, insurers must embrace both technological advancements and creative product design to navigate the evolving risk landscape. By doing so, they can enhance stability, build consumer trust, and be prepared for future challenges.

Read More
Try your instant quote