Search
Close this search box.

Why the Foundation of Insurance’s Future Starts with Automation

Deconstructing the Confusion The “Contractual Liability” (10)

Why the Foundation of Insurance’s Future Starts with Automation

Artificial intelligence (AI) — specifically, generative AI — has dominated headlines and elicited equal parts excitement and wariness among businesses: excitement for the new insights and capabilities gained, and wariness of what it means for the future of work. Insurance is no exception.

Insurers are looking for ways to shoehorn generative AI into their business. However, an inordinate focus on the possibility of AI can actually be a distraction from an overlooked technology area that perhaps merits more attention and investment — automation. In fact, now is a perfect time for the insurance industry to focus on automation. For several years now, consolidation — particularly on the retail/distribution side — has been the big story in the market. Along with consolidation come disparate systems: CRMs, ERPs, agency management systems, payables and so on. The only way to centralize these workflows effectively will be through automation, not AI.

Indeed, the insurance industry is increasingly recognizing the importance of automation: According to McKinsey, investments in automation are expected to account for 50% to 60% of back-office functions by 2025. And, as the industry embraces this technology, it will become clear that efficiency isn’t the only benefit. In fact, automation is also a critical, foundational technology for remaining competitive now and into the future.

Opportunities for efficiency in automation

There exist significant efficiency use cases for automation in insurance, both on the retail/distribution side and the underwriting side. Let’s take an agency or brokerage as an example.

These entities are tasked with being risk managers, of course. But they’re also tasked with overseeing the financial infrastructure between carriers and insurers, which includes managing trust accounts set up for the benefit of carriers, acting as collections agents and record keepers, and auditing balances between insureds, brokers, and carriers. On top of that, agencies and brokers also handle claims and act as claims liaisons. While all of these tasks are important parts of the end-to-end insurance journey, they’re not, by definition, aligned with retail’s primary function of being a risk manager. In fact, these retail-adjacent tasks, performed manually, unnecessarily consume significant time and resources.

Automated systems revolutionize many of these processes. They can quickly evaluate claims, collect data, process payments, and manage carrier payables . Delays related to human error – which can cause unintended cancellations of policies – are eliminated with automation. As a subsequent benefit, customer satisfaction increases. Automation can also improve the customer experience in regular communications: Customers appreciate emails or texts with timely policy reminders and due dates for payments. An automated system managing these reminders and updates contributes to better, more streamlined customer communications at scale.

Evolve and automate to improve business value

Certainly, the technology is there and ripe for adoption. But some in insurance may still be hesitant to fully embrace automation, as worries persist that it would replace humans. But that hasn’t yet been borne out and likely won’t.

The reality is that insurance is a complex business that requires significant human touch. On the retail side, customer-facing employees are still needed to explain coverage and advise insureds on what coverage meets their risk profiles. Collecting premium checks, generating financing agreements, managing account payables once premiums are collected — additional tasks that can be automated — add more inefficiency on top of those already mentioned. These tasks take employees away from selling and spending time servicing customers, a key differentiator in a many competitive markets. It’s a similar argument on the underwriting side, where automation can free employees from manual tasks so they can focus on setting risk.

Using automation to free up important human capital and refocusing resources on unique value or core competencies is, in fact, the future of insurance.

Crawl-walk-run

There’s no doubt that AI will have an important place in insurance. But anyone in insurance who is considering investing in new technology should takes a crawl-walk-run approach: Embrace automation first to today’s inefficiencies, then consider how AI can solve tomorrow’s problems. In doing so, you will have laid the strong foundation required to build out greater success now and into the future.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts

Commercial P&C Insurance

Commercial Office Space Set for a Strong Comeback

The sustained increase in demand for office space across the nation since late 2022 suggests that the market has moved past its lowest point, according to insights from the real estate technology platform, VTS. Demand for office space began to rise in late 2022 and continued into early 2023. Since then, the office market has experienced a period of stability and growth, supported by favorable economic factors, indicating a market rebound. This conclusion is drawn from the VTS Office Demand Index (VODI), which tracks unique new tenant tour requests for office properties in key U.S. markets. The VODI serves as an early indicator of future office leasing activity. According to the index, demand for office space has grown consistently over the past 12 months, closing the second quarter with a 17% year-over-year increase and a 34% rise from the VODI’s lowest point in December 2022. A significant shift in office-based employment patterns further supports the belief that demand for office space has stabilized. After reaching its peak in August 2022, office-based employment declined by 3.9% in early 2024. However, this trend has since stabilized, and employment growth has remained steady. Additionally, a recent decrease in work-from-home rates has fueled the renewed demand for office space. “They say you can only recognize a market bottom after it has passed, and the office space market is no exception. Following what we now see as the bottom, the national demand has gradually increased, though it remains susceptible to economic challenges,” said Nick Romito, CEO of VTS. “However, the growth observed in VODI over the past 18 months, coupled with positive trends in the office-using workforce, suggests that the market has reset, and the worst is behind us.” It’s important to note that this national trend does not impact all local markets equally. Cities like Los Angeles and New York City have seen healthy growth in office space demand, while markets such as San Francisco and Washington, D.C., have experienced prolonged stagnation. In Los Angeles, office space demand surged in the second quarter, briefly surpassing pre-COVID levels, driven by an increase in the average size of office spaces sought by tenants. New York City followed a similar overall pattern, though with some softness in the second quarter. Conversely, San Francisco’s demand for office space remains unpredictable, largely due to its tech-focused workforce, which continues to favor remote work more than other industries. “Markets heavily dependent on the tech sector, like San Francisco and Seattle, are on a markedly different post-COVID recovery path compared to more diversified markets like Los Angeles and New York City. It may take some time before we see office demand in San Francisco and Seattle return to pre-COVID levels,” added Ryan Masiello, Chief Strategy Officer at VTS.

Read More
Cyber Liability

Global IT Outage Puts Business Interruption Insurance in the Spotlight

In July, a global IT outage had a significant impact on business interruption insurance policies, overshadowing the effects on cyber insurance coverages. “This incident wasn’t a result of a malicious attack, which is why typical cyber insurance policies may not have been activated,” explained Peter McMurtrie, a partner in West Monroe’s insurance sector, in an interview with PropertyCasualty360.com. “Where coverage was applicable, factors like deductible amounts, waiting periods, and coverage limits played a critical role in determining the extent of exposure,” McMurtrie noted. “Standard policies for small businesses were less likely to offer coverage, while more complex policies for mid-sized companies and Fortune 500 corporations may have included broader triggers for non-malicious outages caused by third-party software issues.” The outage was triggered by a software update on July 19, 2024, by cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike, which affected organizations worldwide using Microsoft Windows. This interruption had far-reaching consequences, including disrupting hospital systems, media outlets, financial institutions, delaying thousands of flights, and halting daily business operations. McMurtrie emphasized that while the initial impact of the outage was similar for both large and small businesses, the ability to recover operations and whether insurance covered the loss of business income varied. “Larger companies are more likely to have advanced disaster recovery plans that ensure service redundancy following unexpected outages,” he added. “Their insurance programs also tend to cover a wider range of incidents.” According to Microsoft, the CrowdStrike update error affected over 8.5 million Windows devices globally. The incident highlighted the interconnected nature of our global ecosystem, including cloud providers, software platforms, security services, and their clients. “It’s a stark reminder of the importance of prioritizing safe deployment and disaster recovery across the tech industry,” the company said in a blog post. McMurtrie pointed out that the outage’s widespread impact was largely due to its effect on organizations that are critical to societal infrastructure—sectors like agriculture, airlines, banking, energy, government, healthcare, manufacturing, and retail. “Insurance companies base their risk appetite on their ability to understand and price risks appropriately. This becomes increasingly challenging with emerging threats,” he said. “However, I anticipate that insurers will respond by clarifying policy language, refining risk selection criteria, and possibly developing new products specifically designed for this evolving exposure.”

Read More
Try your instant quote