Search
Close this search box.

How armed security impacts insurance coverage

What-Are-The-Benefits-Of-A-Security-Guard-Service

How armed security impacts insurance coverage

With careful consideration, insureds can implement security measures that best meet their needs and facilitate the right insurance coverage.

An organization needs to be confident that its security team has the training and experience to respond appropriately and handle weapons safely.

As organizations resume normal operations post-pandemic — with more people in their facilities and on their property — many are re-evaluating and updating their safety program.

It follows that your insurance customers may be considering whether to introduce or continue using armed security as part of their overall safety strategy. It’s a complex question, particularly when you add in policies around concealed carry.

Now is a good time to have conversations with customers about the type of security that best meets their needs and the implications for their insurance coverage. Here are a few key areas to cover in those conversations.

Armed security and liability

It is important for policyholders to understand the risks that can come with the use of a volunteer armed security team. When an organization asks or allows individuals to carry weapons on its behalf, much of the responsibility and liability for those individuals’ actions transfer to the organization.

That’s why it is strongly recommended that policyholders use off-duty law enforcement officers or a contracted security service. Only highly trained individuals, with a military or law enforcement background, for example, should be allowed to carry weapons as part of a formalized security team. In high-stress situations, an organization needs to be confident that its security team has the training and experience to respond appropriately and handle weapons safely. An armed security team of untrained volunteers often lacks this level of preparation and experience, creating an additional layer of potential risk.

Impact on coverage

Insurers may exclude coverage for a volunteer armed security team, as it creates an additional exposure that may not be contemplated in an organization’s policy. Insureds that have begun using volunteers for armed security or are considering doing so need to meet with their insurer to review all security policies and procedures and determine acceptability. If the organization does not meet best practices, an exclusion may be added. Organizations with an armed security team must be sure they have addressed this additional exposure with their insurer before an event takes place. 

Concealed carry

It is an organization’s choice to either allow or prohibit weapons on its property. It is imperative, however, that the organization and individuals carrying weapons comply with local and state laws. Organizations also need to document their decision about concealed carry in the form of policies, procedures and/or signage.

Candidly, this is the best practice for concealed carry in terms of an organization’s level of liability and responsibility: Only members of a formalized armed security team should carry weapons on behalf of the organization or while serving the organization.

If the organization chooses to allow concealed carry, those individuals should be carrying on their own behalf and in the interest of self-defense, bearing responsibility for their own actions. However, it’s important to note that if an organization allows a concealed carry holder to serve in a non-security-related function, the organization may still be liable.

At Church Mutual®, we recommend that an organization choose not to allow concealed carry on its property if the organization has an armed security team (volunteer or otherwise). If an event should occur, having an armed security team as well as other armed parties may cause confusion and unintended safety risks.

Acceptable exposures

Implementing several best practices in the planning and onboarding stages of a volunteer armed security team can help an organization develop an acceptable exposure — and potentially improve insurance pricing. Examples include:

  • Establish clear policies/procedures and formalize a written security plan.
  • Require all security team members to be over the age of 21.
  • Conduct mandatory background checks on all security team members.
  • Provide comprehensive training for all security team members (in addition to any previous training provided by other organizations).
  • Share response plans with local law enforcement to create awareness of the armed security team and allow for better coordination and training opportunities.

Additional resources

For anyone working through the complexities of armed security, Church Mutual offers free resources on the website. We provide a summary of armed vs. unarmed security considerations, insights on the 10 essentials of a security plan, a security assessment for organizations, and many other relevant documents.

With careful consideration and collaboration, organizations can implement the security measures that best meet their needs and facilitate the right insurance coverage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts

Commercial P&C Insurance

Commercial Office Space Set for a Strong Comeback

The sustained increase in demand for office space across the nation since late 2022 suggests that the market has moved past its lowest point, according to insights from the real estate technology platform, VTS. Demand for office space began to rise in late 2022 and continued into early 2023. Since then, the office market has experienced a period of stability and growth, supported by favorable economic factors, indicating a market rebound. This conclusion is drawn from the VTS Office Demand Index (VODI), which tracks unique new tenant tour requests for office properties in key U.S. markets. The VODI serves as an early indicator of future office leasing activity. According to the index, demand for office space has grown consistently over the past 12 months, closing the second quarter with a 17% year-over-year increase and a 34% rise from the VODI’s lowest point in December 2022. A significant shift in office-based employment patterns further supports the belief that demand for office space has stabilized. After reaching its peak in August 2022, office-based employment declined by 3.9% in early 2024. However, this trend has since stabilized, and employment growth has remained steady. Additionally, a recent decrease in work-from-home rates has fueled the renewed demand for office space. “They say you can only recognize a market bottom after it has passed, and the office space market is no exception. Following what we now see as the bottom, the national demand has gradually increased, though it remains susceptible to economic challenges,” said Nick Romito, CEO of VTS. “However, the growth observed in VODI over the past 18 months, coupled with positive trends in the office-using workforce, suggests that the market has reset, and the worst is behind us.” It’s important to note that this national trend does not impact all local markets equally. Cities like Los Angeles and New York City have seen healthy growth in office space demand, while markets such as San Francisco and Washington, D.C., have experienced prolonged stagnation. In Los Angeles, office space demand surged in the second quarter, briefly surpassing pre-COVID levels, driven by an increase in the average size of office spaces sought by tenants. New York City followed a similar overall pattern, though with some softness in the second quarter. Conversely, San Francisco’s demand for office space remains unpredictable, largely due to its tech-focused workforce, which continues to favor remote work more than other industries. “Markets heavily dependent on the tech sector, like San Francisco and Seattle, are on a markedly different post-COVID recovery path compared to more diversified markets like Los Angeles and New York City. It may take some time before we see office demand in San Francisco and Seattle return to pre-COVID levels,” added Ryan Masiello, Chief Strategy Officer at VTS.

Read More
Cyber Liability

Global IT Outage Puts Business Interruption Insurance in the Spotlight

In July, a global IT outage had a significant impact on business interruption insurance policies, overshadowing the effects on cyber insurance coverages. “This incident wasn’t a result of a malicious attack, which is why typical cyber insurance policies may not have been activated,” explained Peter McMurtrie, a partner in West Monroe’s insurance sector, in an interview with PropertyCasualty360.com. “Where coverage was applicable, factors like deductible amounts, waiting periods, and coverage limits played a critical role in determining the extent of exposure,” McMurtrie noted. “Standard policies for small businesses were less likely to offer coverage, while more complex policies for mid-sized companies and Fortune 500 corporations may have included broader triggers for non-malicious outages caused by third-party software issues.” The outage was triggered by a software update on July 19, 2024, by cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike, which affected organizations worldwide using Microsoft Windows. This interruption had far-reaching consequences, including disrupting hospital systems, media outlets, financial institutions, delaying thousands of flights, and halting daily business operations. McMurtrie emphasized that while the initial impact of the outage was similar for both large and small businesses, the ability to recover operations and whether insurance covered the loss of business income varied. “Larger companies are more likely to have advanced disaster recovery plans that ensure service redundancy following unexpected outages,” he added. “Their insurance programs also tend to cover a wider range of incidents.” According to Microsoft, the CrowdStrike update error affected over 8.5 million Windows devices globally. The incident highlighted the interconnected nature of our global ecosystem, including cloud providers, software platforms, security services, and their clients. “It’s a stark reminder of the importance of prioritizing safe deployment and disaster recovery across the tech industry,” the company said in a blog post. McMurtrie pointed out that the outage’s widespread impact was largely due to its effect on organizations that are critical to societal infrastructure—sectors like agriculture, airlines, banking, energy, government, healthcare, manufacturing, and retail. “Insurance companies base their risk appetite on their ability to understand and price risks appropriately. This becomes increasingly challenging with emerging threats,” he said. “However, I anticipate that insurers will respond by clarifying policy language, refining risk selection criteria, and possibly developing new products specifically designed for this evolving exposure.”

Read More
Try your instant quote