Search
Close this search box.

Insurance Relief for Riot-Impacted Businesses

protesters-holding-signs-4552841

Insurance Relief for Riot-Impacted Businesses

Well-reported incidents of rioting nationwide have resulted in extensive damage to business premises, inventory and other property. In addition, government-instituted curfews or shutdown orders have interrupted businesses, causing commercial enterprises to lose income.

Many managers assume their insurance policies exclude riot-caused damage. Typically, this is not the case. Insurance coverage for property damage and lost income due to riots or civil commotion should be available under most commercial property insurance and business owner insurance policies. Absent special exclusions, these forms of property insurance provide coverage for a variety of losses, including destruction to store fronts and interiors, broken windows, stolen property, graffiti damage and, in most cases, the cost of debris removal.

In addition to property damage coverage, businesses forced to close as a result of riot damage may have coverage for business interruption. Lost income because of the closure of a property that accepts products or services of the policyholder, or that attracts customers to the policyholder’s business, may also be covered under dependent properties or contingent business extensions of coverage. Likewise, lost income as a result of curfews should be available under the civil authority extension of coverage. While insurance companies so far have resisted paying for losses resulting from the coronavirus, business interruption caused by physical damage to property during riots is in a more conventional, and thus clearer, category of coverage.

Typical commercial policies contain coverage limitations, however. Many require a “waiting period” of 72 hours before a policyholder can begin claiming the benefits of coverage. The first three days of business shutdown, constraint of access by barricade, or limited operation because of other civil authority, such as curfews that shorten business use or hours, usually are excluded from coverage. Policies also might limit interruption coverage to short durations of, for example, three consecutive weeks of loss.

Insurers might assert several exclusions. They would, of course, impose any policy limitations on riot or civil commotion. Additionally, some might try to assert a terrorism exclusion. Moreover, for damaged buildings empty for more than 60 days, insurers might raise vacancy exclusions — most notably, an exclusion for vandalism. Finally, insurers might assert overlapping virus exclusions as a bar to full loss-of-use restrictions from rioting.

Policyholders considering coverage should take the following steps:

  1. Review the policy. Analyze coverage and applicable exclusions. An experienced coverage lawyer can help harmonize competing claims and exclusion, especially the complicated area of business interruption losses.
     
  2. Track all damage, expenses and lost income. Insurers will require detailed proof of loss early in a business interruption or property damage claim. Policyholders should consider setting up a separate accounting code to document insured losses.
     
  3. Mitigate damage. Policyholders should take reasonable steps to reduce damages — including installing new doors and windows (or boarding up windows). Damages enhanced by inattention at the site can be limited.

8 things to know in the wake of civil disorders

Following days of riots and protests in cities and towns across the country in the wake of George Floyd’s death, there are many questions concerning insurance coverage, how to manage the risks and what other factors business and property owners should address in the aftermath.

According to the Insurance Information Institute website, there is a cost to these events. Before the riots in Minneapolis and other areas (for which numbers are not yet available), the most expensive civil disorder events occurred from April 29 through May 4, 1992, in Los Angeles, following the acquittal of the police officers involved with the arrest and beating of Rodney King. Property Claims Services (PCS), a unit of Verisk Analytics, found that the riots and looting caused $775 million in insured losses.

More recently, there were $24 million in insured losses following the civil unrest that occurred in Baltimore, Maryland, in 2015 following the death of Freddie Gray, who died while in police custody after he suffered a spinal cord injury.

The slide show above highlights eight factors to consider or actions to take in the wake of civil disorders.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related posts

Commercial P&C Insurance

Commercial Office Space Set for a Strong Comeback

The sustained increase in demand for office space across the nation since late 2022 suggests that the market has moved past its lowest point, according to insights from the real estate technology platform, VTS. Demand for office space began to rise in late 2022 and continued into early 2023. Since then, the office market has experienced a period of stability and growth, supported by favorable economic factors, indicating a market rebound. This conclusion is drawn from the VTS Office Demand Index (VODI), which tracks unique new tenant tour requests for office properties in key U.S. markets. The VODI serves as an early indicator of future office leasing activity. According to the index, demand for office space has grown consistently over the past 12 months, closing the second quarter with a 17% year-over-year increase and a 34% rise from the VODI’s lowest point in December 2022. A significant shift in office-based employment patterns further supports the belief that demand for office space has stabilized. After reaching its peak in August 2022, office-based employment declined by 3.9% in early 2024. However, this trend has since stabilized, and employment growth has remained steady. Additionally, a recent decrease in work-from-home rates has fueled the renewed demand for office space. “They say you can only recognize a market bottom after it has passed, and the office space market is no exception. Following what we now see as the bottom, the national demand has gradually increased, though it remains susceptible to economic challenges,” said Nick Romito, CEO of VTS. “However, the growth observed in VODI over the past 18 months, coupled with positive trends in the office-using workforce, suggests that the market has reset, and the worst is behind us.” It’s important to note that this national trend does not impact all local markets equally. Cities like Los Angeles and New York City have seen healthy growth in office space demand, while markets such as San Francisco and Washington, D.C., have experienced prolonged stagnation. In Los Angeles, office space demand surged in the second quarter, briefly surpassing pre-COVID levels, driven by an increase in the average size of office spaces sought by tenants. New York City followed a similar overall pattern, though with some softness in the second quarter. Conversely, San Francisco’s demand for office space remains unpredictable, largely due to its tech-focused workforce, which continues to favor remote work more than other industries. “Markets heavily dependent on the tech sector, like San Francisco and Seattle, are on a markedly different post-COVID recovery path compared to more diversified markets like Los Angeles and New York City. It may take some time before we see office demand in San Francisco and Seattle return to pre-COVID levels,” added Ryan Masiello, Chief Strategy Officer at VTS.

Read More
Cyber Liability

Global IT Outage Puts Business Interruption Insurance in the Spotlight

In July, a global IT outage had a significant impact on business interruption insurance policies, overshadowing the effects on cyber insurance coverages. “This incident wasn’t a result of a malicious attack, which is why typical cyber insurance policies may not have been activated,” explained Peter McMurtrie, a partner in West Monroe’s insurance sector, in an interview with PropertyCasualty360.com. “Where coverage was applicable, factors like deductible amounts, waiting periods, and coverage limits played a critical role in determining the extent of exposure,” McMurtrie noted. “Standard policies for small businesses were less likely to offer coverage, while more complex policies for mid-sized companies and Fortune 500 corporations may have included broader triggers for non-malicious outages caused by third-party software issues.” The outage was triggered by a software update on July 19, 2024, by cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike, which affected organizations worldwide using Microsoft Windows. This interruption had far-reaching consequences, including disrupting hospital systems, media outlets, financial institutions, delaying thousands of flights, and halting daily business operations. McMurtrie emphasized that while the initial impact of the outage was similar for both large and small businesses, the ability to recover operations and whether insurance covered the loss of business income varied. “Larger companies are more likely to have advanced disaster recovery plans that ensure service redundancy following unexpected outages,” he added. “Their insurance programs also tend to cover a wider range of incidents.” According to Microsoft, the CrowdStrike update error affected over 8.5 million Windows devices globally. The incident highlighted the interconnected nature of our global ecosystem, including cloud providers, software platforms, security services, and their clients. “It’s a stark reminder of the importance of prioritizing safe deployment and disaster recovery across the tech industry,” the company said in a blog post. McMurtrie pointed out that the outage’s widespread impact was largely due to its effect on organizations that are critical to societal infrastructure—sectors like agriculture, airlines, banking, energy, government, healthcare, manufacturing, and retail. “Insurance companies base their risk appetite on their ability to understand and price risks appropriately. This becomes increasingly challenging with emerging threats,” he said. “However, I anticipate that insurers will respond by clarifying policy language, refining risk selection criteria, and possibly developing new products specifically designed for this evolving exposure.”

Read More
Try your instant quote